CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Read the text and answer the following questi... Start Learning for Free
Read the text and answer the following questions.
Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up one's commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.
Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.
Q. Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?
  • a)
    There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.
  • b)
    Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.
  • c)
    There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.
  • d)
    Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need f...
Option 1 mentions that self-correcting mechanism is required in the Parliament to decide on such cases because there are too many of such cases and the judiciary is already overburdened to deal with such cases. This statement supports the requirement of self correcting mechanisms in place.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q. According to the paragraph, which of the following is false?

Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following is an assumption made in the text about why the Speaker should not preside over antidefection cases?

Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following is not true as per the passage?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up one's commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q. Which of the following is an assumption made in the text about why the Speaker should not preside over antidefection cases?

Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following can be inferred regarding the role of the presiding officer from the text?

Top Courses for CLAT

Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the text and answer the following questions.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up ones commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q.Which of the following best supports the statement that parliament should have a self-correcting mechanism and should not pass on the onus to the judiciary in presiding over antidefection cases?a)There are frequent disruptions of such nature in the Parliament and the judicial system is already overburdened.b)Self correcting mechanism would ensure that there is less interference of government officials.c)There are several decisions on which the legislature has already decided the best course.d)Self-correction mechanism is triggered by resource crunch that requires the immediate action of the government.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev