Assertion: Gandhiji decided to launch a nationwide
...
more
satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act.
Reason: British government had monopoly over the production of salt.
a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
c) A is correct but R is wrong
d) A is wrong but R is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Assertion: Gandhiji decided to launch a nationwide

satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act.
Reason: British government had monopoly over the production of salt.
a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
b) Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
c) A is correct but R is wrong
d) A is wrong but R is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Answer

Both are ryt but reason doesn't define the assertion

Rowlatt act was passed by imperial legislative council and states the policies that was not accepted by Indians..

However monopoly over production of salt is different topic..it is related to civil disobedience movement..salt March

Answer

Both are correct but reason is not the correct explanation because rowlatt act, also known as anarchial and revolutionary crimes act , launched in march 1919.
it was for the seditious conspiracy of Indians.
it stated that activists should be imprisoned without trial for two years...

Answer

Both assertion and reason is correct but reason is not the correct explanation for assertion the correct explanation for assertion is that the Rowlatt Act was highly passed and it took many civil liberties of Indians the Indians the characters and insult because mainly they were expecting constitution concessions after the end of the war

Answer

Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A....
bcoz the reason behind the satyagraha against Rowlatt act was it provided unlimited power to the british government in india and they can imprison the politicians without trial for 1 year

Answer

Gandhiji decided to launch a nationwide Satyagraha against the proposed Rowlatt Act, 1919, because

1) It gave enormous power to the government and no power to the leaders.

2) This law was hurriedly passed even after the united opposition by the Indians and other Indian leaders.

3) It allowed the detention of political leaders without any trial for three years.

4) It means that the British Government can arrest any Indian leader without any proof of crime.

Answer

Introduction:
Gandhiji's decision to launch a nationwide satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act was influenced by various factors, including the British government's monopoly over the production of salt. This assertion and reason are both true, but the reason does not provide a correct explanation for the assertion.

Assertion: Gandhiji decided to launch a nationwide satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act.
- The Rowlatt Act was passed by the British government in 1919, allowing them to arrest and imprison Indians without trial. It was seen as a repressive measure that curtailed the civil liberties of Indians.
- Gandhiji strongly opposed the Rowlatt Act as he believed it violated the principles of justice and individual freedom. He saw it as an attack on the rights of Indians and their struggle for self-rule.
- Gandhiji believed in non-violent resistance and decided to launch a satyagraha, a campaign of civil disobedience, to protest against the Rowlatt Act. The aim was to mobilize the Indian population and raise awareness about the injustice of the Act.

Reason: British government had monopoly over the production of salt.
- The reason provided is true. The British government did have a monopoly over the production and sale of salt in India.
- The British colonial rule imposed heavy taxes and regulations on the production and sale of salt, making it an expensive and scarce commodity for the common people.
- Gandhiji recognized the symbolic significance of salt in Indian society. It was not only a basic necessity but also represented the unjust economic policies of the British. By targeting the salt laws, Gandhiji aimed to challenge the British monopoly and empower the Indian masses.

Explanation:
While both the assertion and reason are true, the reason does not provide a correct explanation for the assertion. The Rowlatt Act was a repressive law that curtailed civil liberties, and Gandhiji's decision to launch a satyagraha was a response to this injustice. The reason provided, which focuses on the British monopoly over salt, is only one aspect of the broader motivations behind Gandhiji's satyagraha movement. Gandhiji's campaign was not solely aimed at challenging the salt laws but was a larger protest against the Rowlatt Act itself and the oppressive colonial rule.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, both the assertion and reason in this statement are true. Gandhiji did decide to launch a nationwide satyagraha against the Rowlatt Act, and the British government did have a monopoly over the production of salt. However, the reason provided does not fully explain the assertion, as Gandhiji's decision was influenced by a broader range of factors related to the injustice of the Rowlatt Act and the Indian struggle for self-rule.

Answer

B option is correct answer

Answer

Option b)

Similar Class 10 Doubts

Assertion: Mahatma Gandhi used a novel method of mass agitation known as Satyagraha. Reason: He believed in dharma of non-violence.

Top Courses for Class 10View all

Science Class 10

Social Studies (SST) Class 10

Mathematics (Maths) Class 10

English Grammar Advanced

English Grammar Basic

Top Courses for Class 10

Top Courses for Class 10

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

About Class 10

Class 10 Study Material

Class 10 All Subjects

NCERT Textbook Solutions

Other Classes

Important Links

Company