Question Description
Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The Supreme Court, on November 13, 2019, ruled that the office of Chief Justice of India (CJI) comes under the purview of the ___(i)___ Act.The move to bring the office of the CJI under the transparency law was initiated by activist SC Agrawal. His lawyer Prashant Bhushan had submitted in the top court that though the SC should not have been judging its own cause, it is hearing the appeals due to "doctrine of necessity".The lawyer had described the reluctance of the judiciary in parting information under the ___(i)___ as "unfortunate" and "disturbing", asking: "Do judges inhabit different universe?"Referring to the ___(i)___ provisions, Bhushan had said they also deal with exemptions and information that cannot be given to applicants, but the public interest should always "outweigh" personal interests if the person concerned is holding or about to hold a public office. Dealing with "judicial independence", he said that the National Judicial Accountability Commission Act was struck down for protecting the judiciary against interference from the executive, but this did not mean that judiciary is free from "public scrutiny".The five-judge bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, ___(ii)___, Justice DY Chandrachud, ___(iii)___ and Justice Sanjiv Khanna pronounced the verdict with a 3:2 majority.The verdict comes in the matter of a plea filed by Supreme Court Secretary-General challenging Delhi High Courts 2010 order holding that the CJIs office is a ___(iv)___ and falls under the ambit of the above stated Act. "The concept of judicial independence is not judges personal privilege but responsibility cast on the person", the HC had said in its ruling.In April 2019, the SC bench had reserved the verdict on the appeals. During the hearing, Chief Justice Gogoi observed that in the name of transparency, one cannot destroy the institution.The issue dates back to 2007 when Subhash Chandra Aggarwal filed a plea in HC seeking details of judges assets, but the information was denied. In 2009, Agrawal filed an application in the Supreme Courts Central Public Information Officer (CPIO). He had sought details regarding the appointments of three SC judges: justices R.M. Lodha, H.L. Dattu and A.K. Ganguly.Q.In the above passage, the name of the ACT that has been redacted with ___(i)___. What is the name of the ACT?a)Consumer Protection Actb)Right to Information Actc)Whistle Blower Protection Actd)Companies ActCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.