UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British ru... Start Learning for Free
Why was ‘Economic Drain’ peculiar to British rule?
  • a)
    Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.
  • b)
    India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.
  • c)
    Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.
  • d)
    Both (b) and (c).
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maxi...
The correct option is B.
The British exported to Britain part of India's wealth and resources for which India got no adequate economic or material return. This 'Economic Drain' was peculiar to British rule. Even the worst of previous Indian governments had spent the revenue they extracted from the people inside the country.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maxi...
Introduction

Economic drain refers to the exploitation of a colony's resources by the ruling country, resulting in an unequal economic relationship. This phenomenon was particularly peculiar to British rule in India.

Explanation

1. Lack of economic return

Under British rule, India experienced a significant drain of wealth and resources. The British colonial government implemented policies that were designed to benefit Britain at the expense of India. These policies included heavy taxation, trade restrictions, and the extraction of resources from India.

India was forced to export raw materials such as cotton, jute, tea, and indigo to Britain at low prices, while the finished goods produced in Britain were sold back to India at inflated prices. This resulted in a trade imbalance that favored Britain and led to a significant outflow of wealth from India.

Additionally, the British imposed high taxes on the Indian population, further draining the economic resources of the country. The revenue collected from these taxes was primarily used to sustain the British administrative and military apparatus in India, rather than being reinvested in the development of the Indian economy.

2. Limited investment in India

The British colonial government also discouraged industrialization in India. They implemented policies that prevented the growth of Indian industries, such as imposing high tariffs on Indian manufactured goods and providing subsidies to British industries. This further hindered India's economic development and perpetuated its dependence on Britain.

3. Limited economic autonomy

Another factor that contributed to the economic drain under British rule was the limited economic autonomy of the Indian government. Most Indian governments during this period were puppets of the British, and their policies were largely dictated by the colonial administration. This meant that the revenue extracted from the Indian people was often spent on maintaining the British colonial apparatus rather than being utilized for the development of India's economy.

Conclusion

In conclusion, economic drain was peculiar to British rule in India because India did not receive adequate economic returns for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain. The policies implemented by the British colonial government favored Britain at the expense of India, resulting in a significant drain of wealth and resources from the Indian economy.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.The author of the passage tends to support which of the following statements?I. People are not just numbers nor merely resources for economy. II. The 3 P slogan of People, Planets and Profit. III. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work not investments of money.IV. Free market capitalism. Select the right answer using the code below

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.As per the above passage what were not the consequences of 2008 global financial crisis?I. Bailing out ‘too large to fail’ institutions by governments.II. Millions of common citizens who lost homes and livelihoods were compensated.III. Neo-liberal economics continued to prevail.IV. Global financial systems became fair. Select the correct answer giving the code below.

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.The wake up call given in the club of Rome in 1972 warns of which of the following issues in the above passage?I. Size of the economy measured in money terms alone.II. Ease of doing business and GDP growth is the focus.III. “Thatcher – Reagan – Chicago” model of economics.IV. Minimum governance and unbridled private enterprise. Select the right answer using the code below

Read the following passage and answer the items that follow. Your answer to the items should be based on the passage only.PASSAGEEconomic science has dominated public policy since the 20th century. Debates have raged between “Keynesian” economists and “Friedman” economists: between “welfarists” who see the need for a government hand in the economy and “monetarists” who want governments out of the way to let private entrepreneurs loose and let an “invisible hand” produce good outcomes for all. Both sides agreethat growth in GDP – the size of the economy measured in money terms – is essential. Far-sighted systems thinkers in the Club of Rome gave a wake-up call in 1972. They showed that pursuit of GDP growth was destroying the earth’s capacity to renew itself and provide resources for unbridled economic growth. They introduced the health of the planet into calculations of profit and growth. Meanwhile, economists continue to treat the natural environment as external to the economy. Pleas by communities to protect it are dismissed as impediments to “ease of doing business” and GDP growth. By the millennium’s end, advocates of unbridled private enterprise had prevailed. Needs of citizens who earn their livelihoods by work, not investments of money, were relegated in national economic policies wherever the “Thatcher-Reagan-Chicago” model of neoliberal economics prevailed. The 2008 global financial crisis revealed the fragility of insufficiently regulated markets. Governments of the G7 (later G20) collaborated to stabilize the financial system. They bailed out the “too large to fail” institutions while millions of common citizens, who lost homes and livelihoods, were barely compensated. In fact, some solutions to stabilize the the global financial system, such as the austerity package imposed on Greece, harmed common citizens even further. While the ideology of “minimum government”, with balanced budgets and low inflation has continued, waves of protest have erupted around the world. Citizens complain that the global financial system is unfair. It protects theinterests of large corporations and the wealthiest people while common citizens fall further behind. Demands to include the needs of ‘People’ in economic policy are becoming louder. The “3P” slogan – People, Planet, and Profit – demands a paradigm shift in economics.The ‘invisible hand’ mentioned in the above passage does not support which of the following?

Top Courses for UPSC

Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Why was Economic Drain peculiar to British rule?a)Britain had the maximum number of colonies in the world.b)India got no adequate economic return for the wealth and resources it exported to Britain.c)Most Indian governments spent revenue extracted from the people inside the country.d)Both (b) and (c).Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev