CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: In each question below are given ... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Give answer:
(a) if only I follows.
(b) if only II follows
(c) if either I or II follows.
(d) if neither I nor II follows
(e) if both I and II follow.
Q. Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govt’s new reservation policy.
Course of action:
I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.
II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties  immediately.
  • a)
    if only I follows.
  • b)
    if only II follows
  • c)
    if either I or II follows.
  • d)
    if neither I nor II follows
  • e)
    if both I and II follow.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the given passage and answer the question that follows.It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.On what basis did the Supreme Court, in the judgment in question, set aside the Uttarakhand High Court’s order?

It is quite understandable that a recentSupreme Court judgment, that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions, has caused some political alarm. The received wisdom in affirmative action jurisprudence is that a series of Constitution amendments and judgments have created a sound legal framework for reservation in public employment, subject to the fulfilment of certain constitutional requirements. And that it has solidified into an entitlement for the backward classes, including the SCs and STs. However, the latest judgment is a reminder that affirmative action programmes allowed in the Constitution flow from “enabling provisions” and are not rights as such. This legal position is not new. Major judgments — these include those by Constitution Benches — note that Article 16(4), on reservation in posts, is enabling in nature. In other words, the state is not bound to provide reservations, but if it does so, it must be in favour of sections that are backward and inadequately represented in the services based on quantifiable data. Thus, the Court is not wrong in setting aside an Uttarakhand High Court order directing data collection on the adequacy or inadequacy of representation of SC/ST candidates in the State’s services. Its reasoning is that once there is a decision not to extend reservation — in this case, in promotions — to the section, the question whether its representation in the services is inadequate is irrelevant.The root of the current issue lies in the then Congress government’s decision to give up SC/ST quotas in promotions in Uttarakhand. The present BJP regime also shares responsibility as it argued in the Court that there is neither a basic right to reservations nor a duty by the State government to provide it. The idea thatreservationis not a right may be in consonance with the Constitution allowing it as an option, but a larger question looms: Is there no government obligation to continue with affirmative action if the social situation that keeps some sections backward and at the receiving end of discrimination persists? Reservation is no more seen by the Supreme Court as an exception to the equality rule; rather, it is a facet of equality. The terms “proportionate equality” and “substantive equality” have been used to show that the equality norm acquires completion only when the marginalised are given a legal leg-up. Some may even read into this an inescapable state obligation to extend reservation to those who need it, lest its absence render the entire system unequal. For instance, if no quotas are implemented and no study on backwardness and extent of representation is done, it may result in a perceptible imbalance in social representation in public services. Will the courts still say a direction cannot be given to gather data and provide quotas to those with inadequate representation?Q.On what basis did the Supreme Court, in the judgment in question, set aside the Uttarakhand High Court’s order?

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.India and ASEAN nations have jointly approved the India-ASEAN Digital Work Plan 2022.The work plan was approved at the 2nd ASEAN Digital Ministers' (ADGMIN) Meeting with India, held virtually.The telecom ministry in December 2019 had launched a portal to help people in Delhi-NCR block and trace their stolen or lost mobile phones.The project is backed by the Central Equipment Identity Register (CEIR) system, which was undertaken by the telecom department for addressing security, theft and other concerns including reprogramming of mobile handsets.During the meeting, the Minister of State for Communications said that information and communication technologies (ICT) enables and strengthens democratic systems and institutions through enhanced engagement between citizens and the state.He added that use of ICTs promote free speech, human rights and the free flow of information besides expanding citizens' opportunities to participate in decision-making process and have potential to transform lives of people living in rural areas, the statement said.Source – The Hindu, Jan 29, 2022Q. Consider the following statements about the 2nd ASEAN Digital Ministers' (ADGMIN) Meeting and choose the correct option accordingly.Statement I: The 2nd ADGMIN Meeting was held between telecom ministers of ASEAN countries and dialogue partner countries.Statement II: The representatives of Myanmar chaired the Meeting, and China was the Vice-Chair.

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In each question below are given statements followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, then decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.Give answer:(a) if only I follows.(b) if only II follows(c) if either I or II follows.(d) if neither I nor II follows(e) if both I and II follow.Q.Statement: All resident doctors in Government Hospitals have gone on mass casual leave in protest against the Govts new reservation policy.Course of action:I. The Government should call a meeting of the representatives of the resident doctors and request them to resume their duties.II. The Government should order strict action against striking doctors if they do not resume duties immediately.a)if only I follows.b)if only II followsc)if either I or II follows.d)if neither I nor II followse)if both I and II follow.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev