CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  There are 12 persons in a row. The position o... Start Learning for Free
There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end?
Most Upvoted Answer
There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left....
**Solution:**

To find Vipul's position from the right end, we need to know the total number of persons in the row. In this case, we are given that there are 12 persons in the row.

To determine Vipul's position from the right end, we can subtract his position from the total number of persons in the row and then add 1.

Let's calculate:

Total number of persons in the row = 12

Position of Vipul from the left end = 7

**Calculating Vipul's position from the right end:**

Step 1: Subtract Vipul's position from the total number of persons in the row
12 - 7 = 5

Step 2: Add 1 to the result obtained in step 1
5 + 1 = 6

Therefore, Vipul's position from the right end is 6th.

**Explanation:**

When we count positions from the left end, we start with 1 and keep increasing the count as we move to the right. Similarly, when we count positions from the right end, we start with 1 and keep increasing the count as we move to the left.

In this case, Vipul's position from the left end is 7th. So, there are 6 persons to his right. When we count positions from the right end, Vipul would be the 6th person.

This calculation is based on the fact that the total number of persons in the row remains the same regardless of the direction from which we count the positions. So, if there are 12 persons in the row, Vipul's position from the right end would be 6th.
Community Answer
There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left....
6th from the right 

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 defines a transgender as a person whose gender does not match the gender assigned at birth. It provides recognition of identity of transgender persons and to confer upon them right to self-perceived gender identity.It provides every transgender person a right of residence with parents and immediate family members and be included in his household. It prohibits discrimination against a transgender person including unfair treatment/denial of service in employment, educational institutions, enjoyment of goods, healthcare services, other facilities, opportunities available to public, right to reside/movement among others. This implies that no government/private entity can discriminate against a transgender person in matters related to employment including recruitment and promotion.It criminalises denial of services or denial of use of public places to transgender persons and removal of transgenders from a village or a household. It also states that Article 16 of the Constitution shall usurp any other law. As per this Article, there shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State and that nothing shall prevent Parliament from making any law prescribing, in regard to a class or classes of employment or appointment to an office under the Government of, or any local or other authority within, a State or Union Territory, any requirement as to residence within that State or Union Territory prior to such employment or appointment.A grievance redressal mechanism has been set up for the issues related to transgender under which National Council for Transgender Persons (NCTP) will advise, monitor and evaluate measures for the protection of their rights.It provides for formulation of welfare schemes and programmes for education, social security and health of transgender persons.It will benefit a large number of transgender persons in mitigating the abuse, stigma and discrimination against this marginalised section so as to bring them into the mainstream of society. As per the present Act, the punishment for sexual abuses of transgenders is imprisonment for a term not less than six months but which may extend to two years and a fine.[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from What next for transgender people, as India clears a bill that activists call "murder of gender justice"?, blog by Quartz India]Q.While on vacation in Jaipur, G, a transgender person, came across a pamphlet advertising job openings in a specific government department on the fourth day of his trip. He met all the required qualifications for the position and decided to apply the next day. However, after some time, he received notification that his application had been rejected on the grounds that his gender identity was not considered acceptable for the department. Feeling aggrieved by this perceived violation, G filed a petition in the Supreme Court, arguing that his rights had been infringed upon according to the new Transgender Act. How should this case be decided?

The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2017 allows for a person to be declared as a fugitive economic offender (FEO) if: (i) an arrest warrant has been issued against him for any specified offences where the value involved is over Rs 100 crore, and (ii) he has left the country and refuses to return to face prosecution.To declare a person an FEO, an application will be filed in a Special Court (designated under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002) containing details of the properties to be confiscated, and any information about the person’s whereabouts. The Special Court will require the person to appear at a specified place at least six weeks from issue of notice. Proceedings will be terminated if the person appears. The Bill allows authorities to provisionally attach properties of an accused, while the application is pending before the Special Court. Upon declaration as an FEO, properties of a person may be confiscated and vested in the central government, free of encumbrances (rights and claims in the property). The Bill does not specify how the central government will use the sale proceeds. That is, would the government be obliged to share the sale proceeds with persons who may have a claim against the FEO.Further, the FEO or any company associated with him may be barred from filing or defending civil claims. Under Clause 14, any court or tribunal may bar a FEO from filing or defending any civil claim before it. Further, the Bill allows courts to bar a company from filing or defending any civil claim before it if the promoter, key managerial personnel (such as manager or CEO), or majority shareholder is an FEO. It may be argued that such a bar could violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 states that no person (or company) can be deprived of their right to life or personal liberty, except by law. Courts have interpreted this to include the right to access justice, which cannot be taken away. This right includes the availability of a forum which aggrieved persons may approach to seek legal remedy. The question is whether a bar on filing and defending claims would violate this right. For instance, an individual who is declared an FEO may be involved in a marriage suit or inheritance dispute. Under Clause 14, courts are allowed to bar the individual from exercising his right to file or defend such a claim. Further, there may be cases where an FEO is the majority shareholder of a company. In such cases, even though the company is a separate legal entity, it may be barred from filing or defending cases.Q. The authorities under the PMLA, 2002 will exercise powers given to them under the Bill. These powers will be similar to those of a civil court. Which of the below is not a power they can exercise?

The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2017 allows for a person to be declared as a fugitive economic offender (FEO) if: (i) an arrest warrant has been issued against him for any specified offences where the value involved is over Rs 100 crore, and (ii) he has left the country and refuses to return to face prosecution.To declare a person an FEO, an application will be filed in a Special Court (designated under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002) containing details of the properties to be confiscated, and any information about the person’s whereabouts. The Special Court will require the person to appear at a specified place at least six weeks from issue of notice. Proceedings will be terminated if the person appears. The Bill allows authorities to provisionally attach properties of an accused, while the application is pending before the Special Court. Upon declaration as an FEO, properties of a person may be confiscated and vested in the central government, free of encumbrances (rights and claims in the property). The Bill does not specify how the central government will use the sale proceeds. That is, would the government be obliged to share the sale proceeds with persons who may have a claim against the FEO.Further, the FEO or any company associated with him may be barred from filing or defending civil claims. Under Clause 14, any court or tribunal may bar a FEO from filing or defending any civil claim before it. Further, the Bill allows courts to bar a company from filing or defending any civil claim before it if the promoter, key managerial personnel (such as manager or CEO), or majority shareholder is an FEO. It may be argued that such a bar could violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 states that no person (or company) can be deprived of their right to life or personal liberty, except by law. Courts have interpreted this to include the right to access justice, which cannot be taken away. This right includes the availability of a forum which aggrieved persons may approach to seek legal remedy. The question is whether a bar on filing and defending claims would violate this right. For instance, an individual who is declared an FEO may be involved in a marriage suit or inheritance dispute. Under Clause 14, courts are allowed to bar the individual from exercising his right to file or defend such a claim. Further, there may be cases where an FEO is the majority shareholder of a company. In such cases, even though the company is a separate legal entity, it may be barred from filing or defending cases.Q. A company may be barred from filing a suit against a supplier of goods or from defending a case where tax dues are imposed on it. There may also be instances where creditors obtain court orders for repayment of loans against the company, without the company having an opportunity to present its defence. In all such cases, the interests of the remaining shareholders will not be protected owing to such a bar on companies. A company can be barred from all of the above in which of the following cases?

The Fugitive Economic Offenders Bill, 2017 allows for a person to be declared as a fugitive economic offender (FEO) if: (i) an arrest warrant has been issued against him for any specified offences where the value involved is over Rs 100 crore, and (ii) he has left the country and refuses to return to face prosecution.To declare a person an FEO, an application will be filed in a Special Court (designated under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002) containing details of the properties to be confiscated, and any information about the person’s whereabouts. The Special Court will require the person to appear at a specified place at least six weeks from issue of notice. Proceedings will be terminated if the person appears. The Bill allows authorities to provisionally attach properties of an accused, while the application is pending before the Special Court. Upon declaration as an FEO, properties of a person may be confiscated and vested in the central government, free of encumbrances (rights and claims in the property). The Bill does not specify how the central government will use the sale proceeds. That is, would the government be obliged to share the sale proceeds with persons who may have a claim against the FEO.Further, the FEO or any company associated with him may be barred from filing or defending civil claims. Under Clause 14, any court or tribunal may bar a FEO from filing or defending any civil claim before it. Further, the Bill allows courts to bar a company from filing or defending any civil claim before it if the promoter, key managerial personnel (such as manager or CEO), or majority shareholder is an FEO. It may be argued that such a bar could violate Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 states that no person (or company) can be deprived of their right to life or personal liberty, except by law. Courts have interpreted this to include the right to access justice, which cannot be taken away. This right includes the availability of a forum which aggrieved persons may approach to seek legal remedy. The question is whether a bar on filing and defending claims would violate this right. For instance, an individual who is declared an FEO may be involved in a marriage suit or inheritance dispute. Under Clause 14, courts are allowed to bar the individual from exercising his right to file or defend such a claim. Further, there may be cases where an FEO is the majority shareholder of a company. In such cases, even though the company is a separate legal entity, it may be barred from filing or defending cases.Q. Which of the following is mentioned as a criticism by the author in the above passage?

Top Courses for CLAT

There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end?
Question Description
There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end?.
Solutions for There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end?, a detailed solution for There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? has been provided alongside types of There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There are 12 persons in a row. The position of Vipul is 7th from left. What is his position from the right end? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev