Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences andmdash; andquot;unlawful assemblyandquot; and andquot;defamationandquot; andmdash; the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Read the passage below and answer the questio...

Read the passage below and answer the question.

The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of India's state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.

Q. If the author's arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?

a)
Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in elections
b)
Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal charges
c)
Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interests
d)
The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidates

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has t...

If the author's argument regarding not fielding those candidates with serious criminal charges is true, then the parties should become selective in providing tickets to them. So the correct options is 2. Option 1 is incorrect because 46% is not a majority. Option 3 is incorrect because the voters are already doing that. Option 4 is incorrect as the Supreme Court has already agreed to hear the plea.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has t...

Explanation:

Understanding the Passage:
The passage discusses the Supreme Court's decision to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India regarding the prohibition of political parties from fielding candidates with criminal backgrounds. It highlights the alarming statistics of MPs with criminal records and the concerns associated with their ability to influence elections due to financial resources.

Implications of the Author's Arguments:
Considering the arguments presented in the passage, it can be inferred that if the author's points are true, the following must also hold:

Parties becoming selective:
- Political parties are likely to become more cautious and selective in providing party tickets to candidates with serious criminal charges.
- This will be a proactive measure to avoid tarnishing their party's image and to comply with any potential directives from the Supreme Court.
Therefore, based on the concerns raised in the passage, it is reasonable to conclude that parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal charges.
In conclusion, the passage underscores the need for stricter regulations and ethical standards within the political realm to ensure the integrity of the electoral process and the quality of elected representatives.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the authors conclusion?

View answer

Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. Which of the following can we infer from the given passage?

View answer

Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. Which of the following situations is similar in nature to fielding of criminal politicians that the author describes in the passage?

View answer

The weakness of the political process provides a propitious ground for judicial activism. In many instances the executive has almost invited the judiciary in; in many states, governments routinely seek judicial dispensation to give them political cover for unpopular decisions they might have to make. Judicial activism can mean many things: scrutiny of legislation to determine constitutionality, the creation of law, and the exercise of policy prerogatives normally reserved for the executive.But whatever its form, judicial activism raises two questions. Is it legitimate? Is it effective? The democrat in all of us is rightly suspicious of a few old (mostly) men assuming such broad powers over our destiny without much accountability. We may ruminate that we can throw the politicians out once in a while, but judges are shielded from accountability. On the other hand, our impatience with a debilitating political process whose usual results are inaction makes us thankful for an assertive judiciary.At least the judiciary can protect our rights, clean our air, call politicians to account and so forth. And it must be an unenviable task for judges to steer a middle course between usurping too much power on the one hand, and doing too little to sustain fundamental values on the other.But the prickly question remains: what justifies judicial activism? One possible answer is that judicial activism is justified to the extent that it helps preserve democratic institutions and values. After all, transient majorities in Parliament can barter away our democratic rights; representative institutions are too often burdened with the imperatives of money, power or inertia, that to call their decisions democratic and in the public interest is often something of a joke. If judges use their power to restore integrity to the democratic process, to make our rights, including social and economic ones more meaningful, if they advance the public interest, an assertive judiciary can be an instrument of democracy.This is the most plausible defence of an assertive judiciary.Q. Which of the following is the plausible inference, in support of Judicial Activism, can be attributed to the author of the above passage?

View answer

The weakness of the political process provides a propitious ground for judicial activism. In many instances the executive has almost invited the judiciary in; in many states, governments routinely seek judicial dispensation to give them political cover for unpopular decisions they might have to make. Judicial activism can mean many things: scrutiny of legislation to determine constitutionality, the creation of law, and the exercise of policy prerogatives normally reserved for the executive. But whatever its form, judicial activism raises two questions. Is it legitimate? Is it effective? The democrat in all of us is rightly suspicious of a few old (mostly) men assuming such broad powers over our destiny without much accountability. We may ruminate that we can throw the politicians out once in a while, but judges are shielded from accountability. On the other hand, our impatience with a debilitating political process whose usual results are inaction makes us thankful for an assertive judiciary. At least the judiciary can protect our rights, clean our air, call politicians to account and so forth. And it must be an unenviable task for judges to steer a middle course between usurping too much power on the one hand, and doing too little to sustainfundamental values on the other. But the prickly question remains: what justifies judicial activism? One possible answer is that judicial activism is justified to the extent that it helps preserve democratic institutions and values. After all, transient majorities in Parliament can barter away our democratic rights; representative institutions are too often burdened with the imperatives of money, power or inertia, that to call their decisions democratic and in the public interest is often something of a joke. If judges use their power to restore integrity to the democratic process, to make our rights, including social and economic ones more meaningful, if they advance the public interest, an assertive judiciary can be an instrument of democracy. This is the most plausible defence of an assertive judiciary.Which of the following is the plausible inference, in support of Judicial Activism, can be attributed to the author of the above passage?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the passage below and answer the question.The Supreme Court has taken a timely decision by agreeing to hear a plea from the Election Commission of India (ECI) to direct political parties to not field candidates with criminal antecedents. The immediate provocation is the finding that 46% of Members of Parliament have criminal records. While the number might be inflated as many politicians tend to be charged with relatively minor offences — "unlawful assembly" and "defamation" — the real worry is that the current cohort of Lok Sabha MPs has the highest (29%) proportion of those with serious declared criminal cases compared to its recent predecessors. Researchers have found that such candidates with serious records seem to do well despite their public image, largely due to their ability to finance their own elections and bring substantive resources to their respective parties. Some voters tend to view such candidates through a narrow prism: of being able to represent their interests by hook or by crook. Others do not seek to punish these candidates in instances where they are in contest with other candidates with similar records. Either way, these unhealthy tendencies in the democratic system reflect a poor image of the nature of Indias state institutions and the quality of its elected representatives.Q. If the authors arguments in the given passage are true, which of the following must also be true?a)Majority of Members of the Parliament will not be allowed to participate in electionsb)Parties will most probably become selective in providing party tickets to those with serious criminal chargesc)Voters will become aware of their rights and elect only those candidates who truly represent their interestsd)The Supreme Court will reject the plea of the Election Commission of India considering the record of the candidatesCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam