All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Read the following passage and answer the que... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.
The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.
The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.
Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.
The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.
Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).
The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.
The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.
Q. In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?
  • a)
    four
  • b)
    three
  • c)
    two
  • d)
    five
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bil...
The amendments in Special Protection Group Act, 1988 make two key changes:
  • SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her.
  • The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of 5 years after demitting office.
Before this amendment, former Prime Ministers was guarded by SPG commandos for 10 years.
View all questions of this test
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {Y}?

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {Z}?

Cleared by Parliament, the Protection of Human Rights (Amendment) Bill 2019, which makes sweeping changes of far-reaching consequences to the composition of the commission, will soon be in force. Under the amended law, the government’s choice for the NHRC chair will not be limited to former chief justices of the apex court — it can now hand it over to any of the Court’s retired judges. The impact of this change cannot be predicted with certainty — only time will tell whether the wide extension of the government’s options in selecting the NHRC chief is a change for the better or worse.Under the initial NHRC law, its two non-judge members had to be “persons having knowledge of or experience in matters relating to human rights”. The number of such members has now been raised to three including a woman member, but the imprecise provision of keeping the coveted positions open to any person of the government’s unguided choice remains unchanged. Former governments filled them with its retired officers, and the present dispensation once chose to appoint a ruling party office-bearer — though on being challenged in the court he wisely declined the offer. International human rights jurisprudence is a fast-growing legal discipline and there is no dearth of eminent scholars specialising in it, but successive governments have never considered any such specialist — nor any known human rights activist — for membership of the commission.To the list of national commissions whose heads are NHRC’s ex officio members have now been added two more commissions. The commission will thus have more adjunct than full-timer members. Instead, of the heads of its sister-bodies engaged in class-specific work, it would have been more fruitful to associate with NHRC representatives of a few leading NGOs, promoting human rights in general.With a view to ensuring the independence of the commission, its Act prohibits further government employment for its chair and members. Nevertheless, greener pastures technically not covered by the phraseology of the ban have always been waiting for them. The practice was started with the first commission itself, when two of its sitting members were given gubernatorial positions overnight, and continues till date. The new amendment bill does not disturb the related provision of the Act.The NHRC’s main function is to inquire into complaints of “violation of human rights or abetment thereof, or negligence in the prevention of such violation, by a public servant”. But it cannot execute its decisions based on its findings. For that, this high-profile body has to depend either on the central or state government or on the judicial hierarchy in the country — from the top court down to magistrates. The statutory provisions to this effect are not touched by the new amendments.The 2019 changes made by the present dispensation leave a great deal to be desired. By all counts, the NHRC is yet to be assigned its rightful role in the affairs of the country and the society.Q.Which of the following options best describes the author’s opinion of the 2019 Amendment to the Protection of Human Rights Act?

The cabinet has approved amendments made to the Juvenile Justice Act. This week, the Union Cabinet ushered in some major amendments to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act [X] in a bid to bring in clarity and also entrust more responsibilities on bureaucrats when it comes to implementing provisions of the law.The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was introduced and passed in Parliament in 2015 to replace the Juvenile Delinquency Law and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act) 2000. One of the main provisions of the new Act was allowing the trial of juveniles in conflict with law in the age group of 16-18 years as adults, in cases where the crimes were to be determined. The nature of the crime, and whether the juvenile should be tried as a minor or a child, was to be determined by a Juvenile Justice Board. This provision received an impetus after the 2012 Delhi gangrape in which one of the accused was just short of 18 years, and was therefore tried as a juvenile.Most heinous crimes have a minimum or maximum sentence of seven years. According to the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, juveniles charged with heinous crimes and who would be between the ages of 16-18 years would be tried as adults and processed through the adult justice system. The amendment passed by the Union Cabinet this week has included for the first time the category of “serious crimes” differentiating it from heinous crimes, while retaining heinous crimes. Both heinous and serious crimes have also been clarified for the first time, removing any ambiguity. Women and Child Development Minister [Y], on wednesday, announced that district magistrates (DMs) along with additional district magistrates (ADMs) will monitor the functioning of various agencies under the JJ Act in every district. This includes the Child Welfare Committees, the Juvenile Justice Boards, the District Child Protection Units and the Special juvenile Protection Units.The amendment has been brought in based on a report filed by the NCPCR in 2018-19 in which the over 7,000 Child Care Institutions (or children’s homes) were surveyed and found that 1.5 per cent do not conform to rules and regulations of the JJ Act and 29 per cent of them had major shortcomings in their management. The NCPCR report also found that not a single Child Care Institution in the country was found to be 100 per cent compliant to the provisions of the JJ Act.Q. What is the year [X], which has been redacted from the passage?

The cabinet has approved amendments made to the Juvenile Justice Act. This week, the Union Cabinet ushered in some major amendments to the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act [X] in a bid to bring in clarity and also entrust more responsibilities on bureaucrats when it comes to implementing provisions of the law.The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was introduced and passed in Parliament in 2015 to replace the Juvenile Delinquency Law and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children Act) 2000. One of the main provisions of the new Act was allowing the trial of juveniles in conflict with law in the age group of 16-18 years as adults, in cases where the crimes were to be determined. The nature of the crime, and whether the juvenile should be tried as a minor or a child, was to be determined by a Juvenile Justice Board. This provision received an impetus after the 2012 Delhi gangrape in which one of the accused was just short of 18 years, and was therefore tried as a juvenile.Most heinous crimes have a minimum or maximum sentence of seven years. According to the Juvenile Justice Act 2015, juveniles charged with heinous crimes and who would be between the ages of 16-18 years would be tried as adults and processed through the adult justice system. The amendment passed by the Union Cabinet this week has included for the first time the category of “serious crimes” differentiating it from heinous crimes, while retaining heinous crimes. Both heinous and serious crimes have also been clarified for the first time, removing any ambiguity. Women and Child Development Minister [Y], on wednesday, announced that district magistrates (DMs) along with additional district magistrates (ADMs) will monitor the functioning of various agencies under the JJ Act in every district. This includes the Child Welfare Committees, the Juvenile Justice Boards, the District Child Protection Units and the Special juvenile Protection Units.The amendment has been brought in based on a report filed by the NCPCR in 2018-19 in which the over 7,000 Child Care Institutions (or children’s homes) were surveyed and found that 1.5 per cent do not conform to rules and regulations of the JJ Act and 29 per cent of them had major shortcomings in their management. The NCPCR report also found that not a single Child Care Institution in the country was found to be 100 per cent compliant to the provisions of the JJ Act.Q. Under the new Juvenile Justice Act, which replaced Juvenile Delinquincy law, another new aspect was introduced. What was this?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.The bill to restrict who gets security from the elite Special Protection Group was introduced in the Lok Sabha amid ruckus and sloganeering by opposition by Congress leaders. Minister of State for Home Affairs introduced the bill amid din in the house. The bill intends to make amendments to the Special Protection Group Act, 1988.The amendments will make two key changes: SPG will provide security only to Prime Minister of the day and immediate family members residing with him or her. The other key change is that former Prime Ministers will be guarded by SPG commandos only for a period of {X} years after demitting office.Immediate family members of former PMs will get SPG security as well as long as they are residing with the former PM at the allotted residence. The family will lose the security once the former PM loses it as well. This technically means if an ex-PM dies, his immediate family members would not be entitled to SPG cover.The SPG Act amendment bill came days after the Centre removed SPG cover for the Gandhi family. Sonia Gandhi, son Rahul and daughter Priyanka Gandhi Vadra were up until now being protected by the SPG. Earlier, SPG cover was also removed for former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Since then, Manmohan Singh as well as the Gandhi are being protected under the {Y} security cover of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).The move to revoke SPG cover has been widely criticised by Congress leaders calling the move vindictive. Sources in the government had hit out at the Gandhi family citing occasions where they dispensed SPG at will, not abiding by the rules mandated for security cover.The Special Protection Group is an elite agency that is charged with the proximate security of the Prime Minister of India. The SPG was set up in 1985 after then {Z} was killed by her own bodyguards.Q.In the above passage, what has been redacted with {X}?a)fourb)threec)twod)fiveCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup