Opposition to Public Policy

Restraint of Marriage
The restraint of marriage refers to any action or agreement that restricts a person's freedom to marry. Such restraints can be opposed to public policy for several reasons:

1. Infringement on Personal Liberty: Marriage is considered a fundamental right and a personal choice. Any restraint on this right may be seen as a violation of an individual's personal liberty.

2. Discrimination: Restraints on marriage can also be discriminatory in nature, preventing individuals from marrying based on factors such as race, religion, or social status. Public policy aims to promote equality and prevent discrimination, making restraints on marriage contrary to these principles.

3. Impact on Society: Marriage has social and economic implications for society as a whole. Restraining marriage can hinder the formation of stable families and have negative consequences on social cohesion and the well-being of individuals.

Restraint of Personal Liberty
Restraint of personal liberty refers to any action or agreement that limits an individual's freedom without a valid legal basis. Such restraints can be opposed to public policy for the following reasons:

1. Violation of Fundamental Rights: Public policy is built on the foundation of protecting fundamental rights and freedoms. Any restraint that infringes upon these rights, such as freedom of speech, expression, or movement, can be considered contrary to public policy.

2. Suppression of Individual Autonomy: Public policy values individual autonomy and the ability to make choices freely. Restraints that restrict personal liberty, without sufficient justification, undermine this principle and may be deemed against public policy.

3. Impediment to Social Progress: Restricting personal liberty can impede social progress and development. Public policy aims to foster an environment that promotes individual growth, innovation, and creativity, all of which depend on personal liberty.

Interference with the Course of Justice
Interference with the course of justice refers to any action that obstructs or undermines the proper functioning of the legal system. Interference with the course of justice can be opposed to public policy due to the following reasons:

1. Undermining the Rule of Law: Public policy upholds the importance of the rule of law, ensuring that justice is administered fairly and without interference. Any action that obstructs the course of justice undermines the rule of law and public confidence in the legal system.

2. Impeding Access to Justice: Interference with the course of justice can obstruct individuals' access to a fair and impartial legal process. Public policy seeks to ensure equal access to justice for all, making any interference contrary to its principles.

3. Encouraging Unethical Behavior: Interfering with the course of justice can involve unethical practices such as perjury, witness tampering, or obstruction of evidence. Public policy aims to discourage such behavior and maintain the integrity of the legal system.

In conclusion, all of the listed options - restraint of marriage, restraint of personal liberty, and interference with the course of justice - can be opposed to public policy. These restraints and interferences are contrary to the principles of personal freedom, equality, social progress, the rule of law, and access to justice, which public policy seeks to uphold.