GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  As mentioned by several characters in William... Start Learning for Free
As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesar's murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.
  • a)
    “Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of
  • b)
    “Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causing
  • c)
    “Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and cause
  • d)
    “Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and cause
  • e)
    “Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to cause
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s play...
As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesar's murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.
Meaning Analysis
    • As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directlyafter Caesar's murder,
  • “Havoc!,”
    • a signal used in the Middle Ages,
  • directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.          
This sentence talks about the word “Havoc!”, which is mentioned several times in William Shakespeare’s plays and significantly by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directlyafter Caesar's murder. “Havoc!” was a signal used in the Middle Ages. This signal was used to order the soldiers to loot goods and invoke chaos.  The intention behind these two activities was to cause confusion among the enemy.
Error Analysis
There is no verb for the subject “Havoc!”.   Also, the construction “in order to causing of” is incorrect.  It should be simply “in order to cause”.
Answer Choices
A
“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of
Incorrect:       
This choice has the error pointed out in the error analysis.  
B
“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causing
Incorrect:      
This choice distorts the intended meaning, according to which the purpose of creating chaos is to cause confusion among the enemy.  This choice on the other hand by using comma + causing fails to communicate that sense of intention.
C
“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and cause
Incorrect:       
In this choice, since “cause” is parallel to “pillage” and “invoke,” it fails to convey the meaning that the intention behind pillage and invoking chaos was to cause the confusion.
D
“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and cause
Incorrect:  
This choice repeats the meaning error in option C.
E
“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to cause
Correct:       
This choice corrects the errors of the original sentence.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.I remember the astonishment I felt when I first read Shakespeare. I expected to receive a powerful aesthetic pleasure, but having read, one after the other, works regarded as his best: “King Lear,” “Romeo and Juliet,” “Hamlet” and “Macbeth,” not only did I feel no delight, but I also felt an irresistible repulsion and tedium, and doubted as to whether I was senseless in feeling works regarded as the summit of perfection by the whole of the civilized world to be trivial and positively bad, or whether the significance which this civilized world attributes to the works of Shakespeare was itself senseless. My consternation was increased by the fact that I always keenly felt the beauties of poetry in every form; then why should artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius not just fail to please me, but in fact be disagreeable to me?For a long time I could not believe in myself, and during fifty years, in order to test myself, I several times recommenced reading Shakespeare in every possible form, in Russian, in English, in German and in Schlegel’s translation, as I was advised. Several times I read the dramas and the comedies and historical plays, and I invariably underwent the same feelings: repulsion, weariness, and bewilderment. At the present time, before writing this preface, being desirous once more to test myself, I have, as an old man of seventy-five, again read the whole of Shakespeare, including the historical plays, the “Henrys,” “Troilus and Cressida,” the “Tempest,” “Cymbeline,” and I have felt, with even greater force, the same feelings, this time, however, not of bewilderment, but of firm, indubitable conviction that the unquestionable glory of a great genius which Shakespeare enjoys, and which compels writers of our time to imitate him and readers and spectators to discover in him non-existent merits,—thereby distorting their aesthetic and ethical understanding,—is a great evil, as is every untruth.Although I know that the majority of people so firmly believe in the greatness of Shakespeare that in reading this judgment of mine they will not admit even to the possibility of its justice, and will not give it the slightest attention, nevertheless I will endeavour, as well as I can, to show why I believe that Shakespeare cannot be recognized either as a great genius, or even as an average author.Q.From the information in the passage, which of the following can most reasonably be inferred about the author of the passage?

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.I remember the astonishment I felt when I first read Shakespeare. I expected to receive a powerful aesthetic pleasure, but having read, one after the other, works regarded as his best: “King Lear,” “Romeo and Juliet,” “Hamlet” and “Macbeth,” not only did I feel no delight, but I also felt an irresistible repulsion and tedium, and doubted as to whether I was senseless in feeling works regarded as the summit of perfection by the whole of the civilized world to be trivial and positively bad, or whether the significance which this civilized world attributes to the works of Shakespeare was itself senseless. My consternation was increased by the fact that I always keenly felt the beauties of poetry in every form; then why should artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius not just fail to please me, but in fact be disagreeable to me?For a long time I could not believe in myself, and during fifty years, in order to test myself, I several times recommenced reading Shakespeare in every possible form, in Russian, in English, in German and in Schlegel’s translation, as I was advised. Several times I read the dramas and the comedies and historical plays, and I invariably underwent the same feelings: repulsion, weariness, and bewilderment. At the present time, before writing this preface, being desirous once more to test myself, I have, as an old man of seventy-five, again read the whole of Shakespeare, including the historical plays, the “Henrys,” “Troilus and Cressida,” the “Tempest,” “Cymbeline,” and I have felt, with even greater force, the same feelings, this time, however, not of bewilderment, but of firm, indubitable conviction that the unquestionable glory of a great genius which Shakespeare enjoys, and which compels writers of our time to imitate him and readers and spectators to discover in him non-existent merits,—thereby distorting their aesthetic and ethical understanding,—is a great evil, as is every untruth.Although I know that the majority of people so firmly believe in the greatness of Shakespeare that in reading this judgment of mine they will not admit even to the possibility of its justice, and will not give it the slightest attention, nevertheless I will endeavour, as well as I can, to show why I believe that Shakespeare cannot be recognized either as a great genius, or even as an average author.Q.Each of the following can be inferred about Shakespeare from the passage EXCEPT

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.I remember the astonishment I felt when I first read Shakespeare. I expected to receive a powerful aesthetic pleasure, but having read, one after the other, works regarded as his best: “King Lear,” “Romeo and Juliet,” “Hamlet” and “Macbeth,” not only did I feel no delight, but I also felt an irresistible repulsion and tedium, and doubted as to whether I was senseless in feeling works regarded as the summit of perfection by the whole of the civilized world to be trivial and positively bad, or whether the significance which this civilized world attributes to the works of Shakespeare was itself senseless. My consternation was increased by the fact that I always keenly felt the beauties of poetry in every form; then why should artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius not just fail to please me, but in fact be disagreeable to me?For a long time I could not believe in myself, and during fifty years, in order to test myself, I several times recommenced reading Shakespeare in every possible form, in Russian, in English, in German and in Schlegel’s translation, as I was advised. Several times I read the dramas and the comedies and historical plays, and I invariably underwent the same feelings: repulsion, weariness, and bewilderment. At the present time, before writing this preface, being desirous once more to test myself, I have, as an old man of seventy-five, again read the whole of Shakespeare, including the historical plays, the “Henrys,” “Troilus and Cressida,” the “Tempest,” “Cymbeline,” and I have felt, with even greater force, the same feelings, this time, however, not of bewilderment, but of firm, indubitable conviction that the unquestionable glory of a great genius which Shakespeare enjoys, and which compels writers of our time to imitate him and readers and spectators to discover in him non-existent merits,—thereby distorting their aesthetic and ethical understanding,—is a great evil, as is every untruth.Although I know that the majority of people so firmly believe in the greatness of Shakespeare that in reading this judgment of mine they will not admit even to the possibility of its justice, and will not give it the slightest attention, nevertheless I will endeavour, as well as I can, to show why I believe that Shakespeare cannot be recognized either as a great genius, or even as an average author.Q.What is the meaning of the word ‘consternation’ in the context of the passage?

Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question as follow.I remember the astonishment I felt when I first read Shakespeare. I expected to receive a powerful aesthetic pleasure, but having read, one after the other, works regarded as his best: “King Lear,” “Romeo and Juliet,” “Hamlet” and “Macbeth,” not only did I feel no delight, but I also felt an irresistible repulsion and tedium, and doubted as to whether I was senseless in feeling works regarded as the summit of perfection by the whole of the civilized world to be trivial and positively bad, or whether the significance which this civilized world attributes to the works of Shakespeare was itself senseless. My consternation was increased by the fact that I always keenly felt the beauties of poetry in every form; then why should artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius not just fail to please me, but in fact be disagreeable to me?For a long time I could not believe in myself, and during fifty years, in order to test myself, I several times recommenced reading Shakespeare in every possible form, in Russian, in English, in German and in Schlegel’s translation, as I was advised. Several times I read the dramas and the comedies and historical plays, and I invariably underwent the same feelings: repulsion, weariness, and bewilderment. At the present time, before writing this preface, being desirous once more to test myself, I have, as an old man of seventy-five, again read the whole of Shakespeare, including the historical plays, the “Henrys,” “Troilus and Cressida,” the “Tempest,” “Cymbeline,” and I have felt, with even greater force, the same feelings, this time, however, not of bewilderment, but of firm, indubitable conviction that the unquestionable glory of a great genius which Shakespeare enjoys, and which compels writers of our time to imitate him and readers and spectators to discover in him non-existent merits,—thereby distorting their aesthetic and ethical understanding,—is a great evil, as is every untruth.Although I know that the majority of people so firmly believe in the greatness of Shakespeare that in reading this judgment of mine they will not admit even to the possibility of its justice, and will not give it the slightest attention, nevertheless I will endeavour, as well as I can, to show why I believe that Shakespeare cannot be recognized either as a great genius, or even as an average author.Q.In context of the passage, what does the line—‘artistic works recognized by the whole world as those of a genius’—refer to?

Top Courses for GMAT

As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice As mentioned by several characters in William Shakespeare’s plays, notably by Marc Antony in Julius Caesar directly after Caesars murder, “Havoc!,” a military signal from the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing of confusion among the enemy.a)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos in order to causing ofb)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directing the soldiers to pillage and invoke chaos, causingc)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages that directed the soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and caused)“Havoc!,” a military signal used in the Middle Ages, directed soldiers to pillage, invoke chaos, and causee)“Havoc!” was a military signal used in the Middle Ages to direct soldiers to pillage and to invoke chaos in order to causeCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev