CAT Exam > CAT Questions > The passage given below is followed by a ques...
Start Learning for Free
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.
Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and one’s convictions — that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.
Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they don’t think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.
Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They don’t count hurdles. They don’t brood about failures and risks. They are activators.
They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.
Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.
Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting too much from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isn’t it a choice? Isn’t competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?
Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.
Winning doesn’t always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.
Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting too much from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isn’t it a choice? Isn’t competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?
Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.
Winning doesn’t always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.
Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?
A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.
B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.
A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.
B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.
- a)Only A.
- b)OnlyB.
- c)Both A and B.
- d)Neither A nor B.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most app...
The passage states that everyone is born to win but one has to make winning a habit. This is contradicted by statement A which weakens the main argument.
The passage talks extensively about various qualities that separate winners from the rest. Statement B is incorrect as luck has not been mentioned as a factor to differentiate winners from losers. Thus, statement B is weakening.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
The passage talks extensively about various qualities that separate winners from the rest. Statement B is incorrect as luck has not been mentioned as a factor to differentiate winners from losers. Thus, statement B is weakening.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.
Most Upvoted Answer
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most app...
Weakens the Argument in the Passage:
Point A:
- The argument in the passage emphasizes that winning is a habit that can be developed through certain traits and habits.
- If it is true that one has to be born a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned, it directly contradicts the main premise of the passage.
- This weakens the argument as it suggests that winning is an innate quality rather than a result of developing certain characteristics and habits.
Point B:
- The passage highlights the traits and habits that differentiate winners from losers, such as belief in oneself, continuous learning, setting aggressive goals, and resilience to change.
- If it is true that losers are no different than winners apart from being short on luck, it undermines the idea that certain traits and habits lead to success.
- This weakens the argument by suggesting that luck plays a significant role in determining success rather than personal development and characteristics.
Therefore, both points A and B weaken the argument presented in the passage by challenging the idea that winning is a result of developing specific traits and habits rather than being an innate quality or a matter of luck.
Point A:
- The argument in the passage emphasizes that winning is a habit that can be developed through certain traits and habits.
- If it is true that one has to be born a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned, it directly contradicts the main premise of the passage.
- This weakens the argument as it suggests that winning is an innate quality rather than a result of developing certain characteristics and habits.
Point B:
- The passage highlights the traits and habits that differentiate winners from losers, such as belief in oneself, continuous learning, setting aggressive goals, and resilience to change.
- If it is true that losers are no different than winners apart from being short on luck, it undermines the idea that certain traits and habits lead to success.
- This weakens the argument by suggesting that luck plays a significant role in determining success rather than personal development and characteristics.
Therefore, both points A and B weaken the argument presented in the passage by challenging the idea that winning is a result of developing specific traits and habits rather than being an innate quality or a matter of luck.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
|
Explore Courses for CAT exam
|
|
Similar CAT Doubts
Top Courses for CATView all
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The passage given below is followed by a question. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.Is anyone a born entrepreneur, a born leader or born to win? I believe everyone is born to win but you have to make winning a habit. Think of this: a quitter never wins, a winner never quits. I have been privileged to share the dream and journey of many entrepreneurs. A few traits are habits with all of them. A winner is a believer. Belief in oneself and ones convictions that inner voice of core strength to pursue dreams despite difficulties.Along the way everyone they meet gets swept up in their dreams and aspirations. This belief is rooted in a bigger purpose than self- satisfaction. Winners are great listeners. They learn continuously; they take inputs; they dont think they have all the answers; and they are confident to have the humility to hear other points of view.Listening is about striving for comprehension and making oneself open to possibilities. Winners value self-development. They constantly challenge themselves and set aggressive goals and often surpass expectations. They make organisational learning a priority. Winners are unstoppable. They dont count hurdles. They dont brood about failures and risks. They are activators.They have a clear compass on why they keep trying and what they set out to achieve. Hence they have the edge to get up, dust themselves off, and set out again and again.Winners are decisive. They chart the course and make choices all the time while being transparent and suffused with a clarity of purpose. They are less prone to procrastination. They are resilient to change and very effective in communicating their decisions. Another word for this is nimbleness, and in these times, this quality is essential to innovate.Is all this too much to ask? Of late, too often, I read are we expecting toomuch from young entrepreneurs. Was too much expected of Alexander when he became king at 20 and set out to conquer the world? Or of Akbar who inherited the empire at the age of 14? Being a founder, building a high-velocity organisation is no doubt high-pressure, but isnt it a choice? Isnt competing in the Olympics different from playing cricket in your backyard?Over the years, I have a more nuanced take about winning itself.Winning doesnt always mean being first; winning means you are doing better than you have done before.Q.Which of the following, if true, weakens the argument in the above passage?A. One has to be bom a winner and winning cannot be taught or learned.B. Losers are no different than winners apart from the fact that they are short on luck.a)Only A.b)OnlyB.c)Both A and B.d)Neither A nor B.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup