Difference between Void Agreements and Illegal Agreements

There are different types of contracts, and some of them are considered void or illegal. While both types of agreements are unenforceable, there are some differences between them.

Void Agreements
A void agreement is a contract that has no legal effect from the beginning. It is like the contract never existed. The reasons for a void agreement can be various, such as:

- It is against public policy
- It is impossible to perform
- It lacks consideration
- It is uncertain or is based on a mistake

Illegal Agreements
An illegal agreement is a contract that is prohibited by law. It is not just unenforceable, but it can also lead to criminal charges. Examples of illegal agreements are:

- Contracts to commit a crime
- Contracts that are against the law
- Contracts that would harm the public interest

Differences between Void and Illegal Agreements
Although both void and illegal agreements are unenforceable, there are some differences between them:

- Void agreements are unenforceable from the beginning, while illegal agreements may become unenforceable if they are discovered or challenged in court.
- Void agreements are not necessarily against the law, while illegal agreements are prohibited by law.
- Void agreements may be innocent mistakes or misunderstandings, while illegal agreements involve a deliberate intention to break the law.

Conclusion
In conclusion, void agreements and illegal agreements are both unenforceable, but they have different characteristics. Void agreements are contracts that are void from the beginning, while illegal agreements are prohibited by law. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between them to avoid legal consequences.

void agreements are void from the begining due to imposiblity of satisfying the conditions example the agreement of bring stars to the earth is void as it is not possible and illegal agreements are not enforcable by law example a agreement to kill a person and so it is void