All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly ... Start Learning for Free
DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraph
Some decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws‟ offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.
  • a)
    Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relative‟s offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.
  • b)
    Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.
  • c)
    Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.
  • d)
    Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
Verified Answer
DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above para...
The argument gives a generalisation and a couple of examples to substantiate the point. Moreover, the argument says that some decisions obviate thinking under some circumstances and not that they always obviate thinking.
B does not take into account this aspect of the argument.
Nowhere in the argument do we find the idea that examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives. So,C is incorrect.
It also fails to take into consideration the circumstances under which thinking is not required.D also does not take into account this aspect nor does it talk about the generalisation.
This option would mean that there are only two "no-brainers" while the argument mentions these as just examples. A gets the structure and the content of the argument right.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above para...
The argument gives a generalisation and a couple of examples to substantiate the point. Moreover, the argument says that some decisions obviate thinking under some circumstances and not that they always obviate thinking.
B does not take into account this aspect of the argument.
Nowhere in the argument do we find the idea that examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives. So,C is incorrect.
It also fails to take into consideration the circumstances under which thinking is not required.D also does not take into account this aspect nor does it talk about the generalisation.
This option would mean that there are only two "no-brainers" while the argument mentions these as just examples. A gets the structure and the content of the argument right.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above para...
Summary of the Paragraph
The paragraph discusses decision-making in scenarios where the choices are clear-cut or "no-brainers." It provides specific examples illustrating how certain circumstances can lead to obvious decisions.
Key Points from the Summary
- Obvious Decisions: Some decisions stand out as clear choices, often influenced by circumstances.
- Examples Provided:
- Accepting a relative's offer of free vacation accommodation when finances are tight.
- Stepping in for a boss during her absence due to a professional development course.
- Context Matters: The ease of making these decisions is tied to specific situations, such as financial constraints or job responsibilities.
Why Option A is Correct
- Clarity and Context: Option A accurately reflects the essence of the paragraph by emphasizing that decisions can seem obvious based on the context.
- Examples Align with the Original: It reiterates the specific scenarios presented, confirming the idea that such decisions are straightforward under certain conditions.
- Balanced View: Unlike other options, A does not oversimplify the nature of decision-making but acknowledges the role of circumstances.
In conclusion, option A effectively encapsulates the main ideas of the paragraph, highlighting that some decisions are indeed straightforward when influenced by specific circumstances.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow.Burawoy divides sociology into four distinct types professional, critical, public, and policy distinguished by audience (academic versus nonacademi c) and forms of knowledge (instrumental versus reflexiv e). Many commentators have noted that these central concepts anchoring his discussion are useful but ambiguous. As feminist sociologists who engage in forms of public sociology, we are concerned about the ambiguities of these concepts. In branding professional sociology as instrumental academic research, Burawoy elevates it above all other forms in his typology as the core of the discipline, contrary to his own efforts to challenge this hierarchy of evaluation. Professional sociology, he writes, provides legitimacy, expertise, distinctive problem definitions, relevant bodies of knowledge and techniques for analyzing data. An effective public or policy sociology is not hostile to, but depends upon the professional sociology that lies at the core of our disciplinary field. An implication of his analysis is that good research is only done in the sphere of professional sociology and that this sociology leads the other sociologies: only professionally oriented, disengaged research is conducted with rigour and is capable of yielding methodological and theoretical innovation.Read through a much earlier critique of trends in US sociology that included pleas for critical public engagement, Burawoys professional sociology brings to mind the categories of abstracted empiricism and grand theory that C. Wright Mills so trenchantly critiqued and that most feminist theories and methodologies have sought to overcome. In addition, despite his efforts to provincialize US sociology, Burawoys 2x2 table can be interpreted as a Parsonian-type model that intends to apply to sociology everywhere while most closely reflecting a particular kind of US sociology. This form of US sociology is formalistically professionalized, especially at the more elite research universities as distinct from being professional and results in institutionalized practices that are unnecessarily rigid and exclusionary. Rather than using this model to prescribe what sociology should be, McLaughlin and Turcotte usefully argue that it should be turned into empirical, researchable questions that determine the size and influence of each type of sociology within different disciplinary, institutional, and national contexts. As feminist sociologists, we are also concerned about other problems of interpretation in Burawoys typology. Burawoy characterizes each ideal type as a division of labour that exists, normatively, in reciprocal interdependence. He suggests that most sociologists concentrate their efforts in one type although he grants that they may simultaneously inhabit more than one of the cells or change from one to another over their careers. While allowing for internal complexity of each type (e.g., professional sociology can be reflexive at times, not just instrumental) and for permeable boundaries between the four types, Burawoys model can be interpreted as overly bounded, static, and nonvariable. It does not appear, for example, to adequately account for such multidisciplinary fields as social gerontology or feminist sociology in which the distinctions between professional, critical, policy, and public domains are blurred. In attempting to integrate sociology and legitimate public sociology, Burawoy glosses over the contradictions and tensions between the four types he identifies, particularly vis-a-vis the longstanding methodological feuds between positivism, critical theory, and postpositivism. As feminists aware of sociologys history of exclusions in the production of knowledge, we are wary of hierarchies that Burawoys typology may initiate or reproduce that rest on a narrowly cast US version of professional sociology. In contrast to his concept of professional sociology as an engagement with specific social theories (that are not critical) or with a limited range of methodological approaches to research (that are neither reflexive nor involve publics or policymaking), we suggest looking for a more inclusive definition. A more inclusive definition of professional sociology might, for example, involve particular credentials (a graduate degree in sociology) and the undertaking of specific activities (such as teaching sociology in a university or college and/or engaging in rigorous ethical research and publishing). This definition embraces a diversity of orientations, methods, institutional locations, and public and policy engagements Equally important, however, is the fact that Burawoys identification of four distinct forms of sociology is itself questionable. As Ericson notes, sociology is (or perhaps should be) simultaneously professional, critical, public, and policy relevant. Whether or not sociology does or should take these forms simultaneously, and how such research is undertaken, requires discussion and empirical investigation. As part of this process, we describe below our research to provide examples of the simultaneous undertaking of professional, critical, policy, and public sociology.We also take issue with the Gramscian separation of the distinct spheres of state, economy, and civil society that underlies Burawoys discussion. In sharply dividing the subject matter of the cognate fields of political science, economics, and sociology with their respective attention to the state, market, and civil society his model ignores the growth of interdisciplinary research in which many of us have long engaged. Interestingly, this division also entirely ignores other disciplines, such as anthropology, for which a parallel debate (the call for more public anthropology) predates by several years Burawoys intervention (for example, in Chicago in 1999, the topic of the American Anthropological Association forum was Public Anthropology).As Calhoun argues, rather than reinforcing disciplinary boundaries and social dichotomies, we should be arguing that state and market are social. Burawoys model tends to demonize the state (and policy intervention/state reform) as well as the market, while romanticizing civil society (including giving it a progressive spin). This ignores both the multisited institutional locations of sociological research and the complex interplay between fields of power, agency, and social change. Feminist theorizing shows that civil society is a complex concept that consists of both the public and the private spheres structured as male-dominated, with the private often disappearing in discourse on civil society. Burawoys focus on civil society can be interpreted as reinvoking the public and private dichotomy of Western societies that has been the subject of so much feminist critique, especially in its argument that family and community life (sites of civil society) cannot be understood as separate from political and economic spheres. Significant feminist theory and research have made a concerted effort to argue for a reconceptualization of these spheres acknowledging their interpenetration, rather than isolation from one another.Where we are in fundamental agreement with Burawoy is in locating the central questions for assessing the state of sociology in the US, Canada, and elsewhere by asking sociology for whom? and sociology for what? These questions require reflexivity that positions social theories, research methodologies, and indeed researchers within contexts of power and social location. Burawoy designates critical and public sociology as inherently reflexive in contrast to professional and policy sociology. Defining reflexivity, however, is no simple task. According to Burawoy (2004:1606), reflexive knowledge is communicative action that aspires to a dialogic character, although mutuality and reciprocity are often difficult to achieve in practice. Reflexivity involves value discussion concerning the ethical goals for which research may be mobilized and stimulates public discussions about the possible meanings of the good society.Recent feminist epistemological debates have been particularly fruitful in contributing to and expanding upon critical theorys understanding of reflexivity. Critical feminist sociological debates, informed especially by engagement with extra-academic communities concerned about social justice for socially marginalized groups, have helped to shape our research.Q.Which of the following about Burawoys hypotheses does the not criticize?

Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given More and more companies, government agencies, educational institutions and philanthropic organisations are today in the grip of a new phenomenon: ‘metric fixation’. The key components of metric fixation are the belief that it is possible - and desirable - to replace professional judgment (acquired through personal experience and talent) with numerical indicators of comparative performance based upon standardised data (metrics); and that the best way to motivate people within these organisations is by attaching rewards and penalties to their measured performance.The rewards can be monetary, in the form of pay for performance, say, or reputational, in the form of college rankings, hospital ratings, surgical report cards and so on. But the most dramatic negative effect of metric fixation is its propensity to incentivise gaming: that is, encouraging professionals to maximise the metrics in ways that are at odds with the larger purpose of the organisation. If the rate of major crimes in a district becomes the metric according to which police officers are promoted, then some officers will respond by simply not recording crimes or downgrading them from major offences to misdemeanors. Or take the case of surgeons. When the metrics of success and failure are made public - affecting their reputation and income - some surgeons will improve their metric scores by refusing to operate on patients with more complex problems, whose surgical outcomes are more likely to be negative. Who suffers? The patients who don’t get operated upon.When reward is tied to measured performance, metric fixation invites just this sort of gaming. But metric fixation also leads to a variety of more subtle unintended negative consequences. These include goal displacement, which comes in many varieties: when performance is judged by a few measures, and the stakes are high (keeping one’s job, getting a pay rise or raising the stock price at the time that stock options are veste d), people focus on satisfying those measures - often at the expense of other, more important organisational goals that are not measured. The best-known example is ‘teaching to the test’, a widespread phenomenon that has distorted primary and secondary education in the United States since the adoption of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.Short-termism is another negative. Measured performance encourages what the US sociologist Robert K Merton in 1936 called ‘the imperious immediacy of interests … where the actor’s paramount concern with the foreseen immediate consequences excludes consideration of further or other consequences’. In short, advancing short-term goals at the expense of long-range considerations. This problem is endemic to publicly traded corporations that sacrifice long-term research and development, and the development of their staff, to the perceived imperatives of the quarterly report.Q. Of the following, which would have added the least depth to the author’s argument?

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.In a bustling city known for its thriving tech industry, three talented sales professionals, Alex, Emma, and Liam, were entrusted with the task of promoting an innovative software solution called LinkPro to various businesses. Each week, they were assigned different territories to cover. Once a sales professional enters in a particular territory, he can meet any number of businessmen and any businessman can buy any number of software or may not buy any software. The success rate of a sales professional for a week is defined as the ratio of the number of software sold to the number of businessmen visited in that week. Some details about their performances are given below:(i) Over the course of two weeks, the number of businessmen visited by Alex, Emma and Liam are in the ratio 2 : 5 : 4, however each of them sold 80 software.(ii) Emmas success rate for week-1 is 2/3 but Alexs success rate for the same week is 7/3, however altogether, all the three visited 81 businessmen in week-1.(iii) Emma sold 56 software in week-2.(iv) Alex visited 10 more businessmen in week-2 than week-1. However all the sales professionals visited more number of businessmen in week-2 as compared to week-1.(v) Liam visited the number of businessmen in week-1 and week-2 in the ratio 3 : 5 and sold software in the ratio 1 : 3.Q.What is the number of software sold by Alex in week-2? Correct answer is '45'. Can you explain this answer?

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.In a bustling city known for its thriving tech industry, three talented sales professionals, Alex, Emma, and Liam, were entrusted with the task of promoting an innovative software solution called LinkPro to various businesses. Each week, they were assigned different territories to cover. Once a sales professional enters in a particular territory, he can meet any number of businessmen and any businessman can buy any number of software or may not buy any software. The success rate of a sales professional for a week is defined as the ratio of the number of software sold to the number of businessmen visited in that week. Some details about their performances are given below:(i) Over the course of two weeks, the number of businessmen visited by Alex, Emma and Liam are in the ratio 2 : 5 : 4, however each of them sold 80 software.(ii) Emmas success rate for week-1 is 2/3 but Alexs success rate for the same week is 7/3, however altogether, all the three visited 81 businessmen in week-1.(iii) Emma sold 56 software in week-2.(iv) Alex visited 10 more businessmen in week-2 than week-1. However all the sales professionals visited more number of businessmen in week-2 as compared to week-1.(v) Liam visited the number of businessmen in week-1 and week-2 in the ratio 3 : 5 and sold software in the ratio 1 : 3.Q.How many businessman were visited by all the sales professional together in two-week period? Correct answer is '220'. Can you explain this answer?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTION: Key in the option which correctly summarizes the above paragraphSome decisions will be fairly obvious - “no-brainers.” Your bank account is low, but you have a two-week vacation coming up and you want to get away to some place warm to relax with your family. Will you accept your in-laws offer of free use of their Florida beachfront condo? Sure. You like your employer and feel ready to move forward in your career. Will you step in for your boss for three weeks while she attends a professional development course? Of course.a)Some decisions are obvious under certain circumstances. You may, for example, readily accept a relatives offer of free holiday accommodation. Or step in for your boss when she is away.b)Some decisions are no-brainers. You need not think when making them. Examples are condo offers from in-laws and job offers from bosses when your bank account is low or boss is away.c)Easy decisions are called “no-brainers” because they do not require any cerebral activity. Examples such as accepting free holiday accommodation abound in our lives.d)Accepting an offer from in-laws when you are short on funds and want a holiday is a no-brainer. Another no-brainer is taking the boss’s job when she is away.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup