Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.

a)
BCAD
b)
ADCB
c)
ABCD
d)
DBCA
e)
DBAC

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Practice Test for NMAT - 6

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between ...

Reason for an uncertain future in Yugoslav state is given in statement B. Hence, it follows statement 1 More details of ideological difference is given in statement C. Hence, it follows statement B Statement A explains what will happen because of ideological differences. Hence, it follows statement C Statement D also explains impacts of these differences. Hence, the correct sequence is 1BCAD6 Option 1

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between ...

Logical Sequence:

Sentence 1: The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future.

Sentence 3: Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound.

Sentence 2: Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country.

Sentence 4: Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences.

Sentence 6: At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.

Sentence 5: The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena.
This sequence makes sense as it starts by highlighting the uncertain future of Yugoslavia due to its fragility, followed by the deep-rooted disparities within the country. The existing sharp ideological differences are then mentioned, leading to the prediction of chaos if these differences are not resolved. The consequences of not settling these differences are discussed, including the loss of reputation and vulnerability to international interference.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Attention CAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions : Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions given after the passage. Certain words/phrases have been printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of the questions.States are highly competitive actors and the competitiveness that exists between them has become increasingly intensified as the world order has become ever more globalised. In order to be successful and prosperous in this competitive environment states require access to reliable intelligence that reveals the strengths and weaknesses of their competitors. Knowledge is power, after all.A significant amount of intelligence collected by states is from sources which are publicly available. Espionage is a prevalent method of gathering intelligence and describes 'the consciously deceitful collection of information, ordered by a government or organisation hostile to or suspicious of those the information concerns, accomplished by humans unauthorised by the target to do the collecting'. Espionage, then, is the unauthorised collection of non-publicly available information. The act of espionage can be committed through various methods. In its traditional conception, espionage describes the practice whereby a state dispatches an agent into the physical territory of another state in order to access and obtain confidential information. States have, however, exploited technological developments in order to devise more effective methods through which to conduct espionage. Since the emergence of vessels, aeroplanes and celestial bodies, the sea, the skies and outer space have all been used as platforms to engage in (often electroni c) surveillance of adversaries; that is, to commit espionage from afar. It therefore comes as no surprise that since its creation cyberspace has also been harnessed as a medium through which to commit espionage. Indeed, the exploitation of cyberspace for the purpose of espionage has emerged as a particularly attractive method to acquire confidential information because of the large amount of information that is now stored in cyberspace and because cyberspace affords a considerable degree of anonymity to perpetrators of espionage and is thus a relatively risk free enterprise.Unsurprisingly, espionage has 'metastasised' since the emergence of cyberspace and reports suggest that cyber espionage projects are now prevalent. As an illustration, in February 2013 the Mandiant Report identified China as a persistent perpetrator of cyber espionage. In fact, the report claims that a cyber espionage entity known as Unit 61398 has been specifically created by the Chinese government and is formally incorporated into the Chinese People's Liberation Army. The Report suggests that Unit 61398 is responsible for organising and instigating a massive cyber espionage campaign against other states and non-state actors, seeking to exploit vulnerable computer systems in order to access sensitive and confidential information with the aim of bolstering China's position in the international political and economic order. Only four months later in June 2013 cyber espionage was again thrust firmly into the international spotlight when Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the US National Security Agency (NS

View answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, refers to the proposal that the particular language one speaks influences the way one thinks about reality. The linguistic relativity hypothesis focuses on structural differences among natural languages such as Hopi, Chinese, and English, and asks whether the classifications of reality implicit in such structures affect our thinking about reality. Analytically, linguistic relativity as an issue stands between two others: a semiotic-level concern with how speaking any natural language whatsoever might influence the general potential for human thinking (i.e., the general role of natural language in the evolution or development of human intellectual functioning), and a functional or discourse-level concern with how using any given language code in a particular way might influence thinking (i.e., the impact of special discursive practices such as schooling and literacy on formal thought). Although analytically distinct, the three issues are intimately related in both theory and practice. For example, claims about linguistic relativity depend on understanding the general psychological mechanisms linking language to thinking, and on understanding the diverse uses of speech in discourse to accomplish acts of descriptive reference. Hence, the relation of particular linguistic structures to patterns of thinking forms only one part of the broader array of questions about the significance of language for thought. Proposals of linguistic relativity necessarily develop two linked claims among the key terms of the hypothesis (i.e., language, thought, and reality). First, languages differ significantly in theirinterpretationsof experienced reality – both what they select for representation and how they arrange it. Second, language interpretations haveinfluenceson thought about reality more generally – whether at the individual or cultural level. Claims for linguistic relativity thus require both articulating the contrasting interpretations of reality latent in the structures of different languages, and assessing their broader influences on, or relationships to, the cognitive interpretation of reality.Q.Which of the following proverbs may be false, if above passage were to be right?A. If speech is silver, silence is gold.B. When you have spoken a word, it reigns over you. When it is unspoken you reign over it.C. Speech of yours ought to be seldom and well chosen.

View answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, refers to the proposal that the particular language one speaks influences the way one thinks about reality. The linguistic relativity hypothesis focuses on structural differences among natural languages such as Hopi, Chinese, and English, and asks whether the classifications of reality implicit in such structures affect our thinking about reality. Analytically, linguistic relativity as an issue stands between two others: a semiotic-level concern with how speaking any natural language whatsoever might influence the general potential for human thinking (i.e., the general role of natural language in the evolution or development of human intellectual functioning), and a functional or discourse-level concern with how using any given language code in a particular way might influence thinking (i.e., the impact of special discursive practices such as schooling and literacy on formal thought). Although analytically distinct, the three issues are intimately related in both theory and practice. For example, claims about linguistic relativity depend on understanding the general psychological mechanisms linking language to thinking, and on understanding the diverse uses of speech in discourse to accomplish acts of descriptive reference. Hence, the relation of particular linguistic structures to patterns of thinking forms only one part of the broader array of questions about the significance of language for thought. Proposals of linguistic relativity necessarily develop two linked claims among the key terms of the hypothesis (i.e., language, thought, and reality). First, languages differ significantly in theirinterpretationsof experienced reality – both what they select for representation and how they arrange it. Second, language interpretations haveinfluenceson thought about reality more generally – whether at the individual or cultural level. Claims for linguistic relativity thus require both articulating the contrasting interpretations of reality latent in the structures of different languages, and assessing their broader influences on, or relationships to, the cognitive interpretation of reality.Q.If Sapir-Whorf hypothesis were to be true, which of the following conclusions would logically follow?A. To develop vernacular languages, government should promote public debates and discourses.B. Promote vernacular languages as medium of instruction in school.C. Cognitive and cultural realities are related.

View answer

DIRECTIONSfor the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, also known as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, refers to the proposal that the particular language one speaks influences the way one thinks about reality. The linguistic relativity hypothesis focuses on structural differences among natural languages such as Hopi, Chinese, and English, and asks whether the classifications of reality implicit in such structures affect our thinking about reality. Analytically, linguistic relativity as an issue stands between two others: a semiotic-level concern with how speaking any natural language whatsoever might influence the general potential for human thinking (i.e., the general role of natural language in the evolution or development of human intellectual functioning), and a functional or discourse-level concern with how using any given language code in a particular way might influence thinking (i.e., the impact of special discursive practices such as schooling and literacy on formal thought). Although analytically distinct, the three issues are intimately related in both theory and practice. For example, claims about linguistic relativity depend on understanding the general psychological mechanisms linking language to thinking, and on understanding the diverse uses of speech in discourse to accomplish acts of descriptive reference. Hence, the relation of particular linguistic structures to patterns of thinking forms only one part of the broader array of questions about the significance of language for thought. Proposals of linguistic relativity necessarily develop two linked claims among the key terms of the hypothesis (i.e., language, thought, and reality). First, languages differ significantly in theirinterpretationsof experienced reality – both what they select for representation and how they arrange it. Second, language interpretations haveinfluenceson thought about reality more generally – whether at the individual or cultural level. Claims for linguistic relativity thus require both articulating the contrasting interpretations of reality latent in the structures of different languages, and assessing their broader influences on, or relationships to, the cognitive interpretation of reality.Q.Which of the following conclusions can be derived based on Sapir-Whorf hypotheses?

View answer

There are some accounts of the nature of language learning that seem to imply that masters of a language have knowledge about their language. According to some accounts, a child learning a language is involved in much the same sort of activity as a field linguist who is trying to figure out the language of the natives she is studying. The field linguist is involved in constructing a theory of the native language: the linguist formulates hypotheses about what certain words and phrases mean, tests these hypotheses (perhaps by making predictions about what the natives would say in a certainsituation, or by talking to the natives and making predictions about their replies to her), and modifies her theory in light of the results of those tests. The idea is that infant language learners are little linguists involved in the same sort of process. Of course, on this picture of language learning as theory construction, the theory construction takes place at a subconscious level and the hypotheses are formulated in the so-called Language of Thought, which is distinct from any natural language.If this account of language learning is true, then it must be the case that language learners have linguistic knowledge. For one, the language learners will know the results of their theory. In much the way that the linguist, at the end of the day, knows that toktok is the native word for fire, so the language learner will know the meanings of the words of the language he has learned. Second, the language learner must have knowledge of the concepts required for the formulation of his hypotheses. If, for instance, the hypotheses formulated by the language learner include claims like The large box is a noun phrase and The box was painted by Nancy is in the passive voice, then the language learner must know what noun phrases are and what it means for a sentence to be in the passive voice. To formulate hypotheses about noun phrases, the passive voice, and other semantic and syntactic categories, the language learner must have knowledge about those categories. Or, to put the point another way, the language learner must possess the concepts he deploys in the hypotheses he formulates in the process of learning the language.Q.Which of the following, if true, would weaken the school of thought that believes that masters of a language have knowledge about their language?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series and 500+ Practice Tests 2024

Top Courses for CAT

View all

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Arrange the sentences A, B, C, and D from a logical sequence between sentences 1 and 6. 1. The fragile Yugoslav state has an uncertain future. A. Thus, there will surely be chaos and uncertainty if the people fail to settle their differences. B. Sharp ideological differences already exist in the country. C. Ethnic, regional, linguistic and material disparities are profound. D. The country will also lose the excellent reputation it enjoyed in the international arena. 6. At worst, it will once more become vulnerable to international conspiracy and intrigue.a) BCADb) ADCBc) ABCDd) DBCAe) DBACCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam