In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > In making decisions about important question...

Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.

II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.

III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.

a)
None is strong
b)
Only I is strong
c)
Only II is strong
d)
Only III is strong
e)
Only I and II are strong

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be ...

Argument I is weak because this is not the only way to handle such elections Given the large electoral population and geography of India, having elections on a single day does not help the commission to concentrate on election related issues. Hence, argument II is also weak. Comparing with other countries about the elections is not a strong argument as the factors and challenges of different countries' elections will be different.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Statement: Should the govt. deregulate the retail prices of petrol, diesel and cooking gas and allow the prices to be driven by market conditions?Arguments: I. Yes, this will largely help the oil companies to sell their products at competitive price.II. No, the general public cannot afford market driven prices of these products.III. Yes, govt. needs to stop subsidizing these products and channelize the money for developmental projects.

View answer

Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' argument(s) and which is/are 'weak' argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Should Indians shift their focus on other games rather than cricket, the much revered game in India, to improve performance in Olympics?Arguments:I. No, India has more important issues like malnutrition and lack of sanitation and hygiene to address.II. Yes, many potential players have lost hope to make a career in sports due to lack of attention to other sports, as compared to cricket.

View answer

Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between "strong" arguments and "weak" arguments. "Strong" arguments must be both important and directly related to the questions. "Weak" arguments may not be directly related to the question and may be of minor importance or may be related to the trivial aspects of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is "strong" arguments and which is "weak" argument.Should the retirement age for employees of Central/State Govt. be increased by two years?I. Yes, this is required in view of the increasing longevity.II. Yes, experienced employees are more useful than the new recruits.

View answer

DIRECTION for the question: Read the passage and answer the question based on it.There is an essential and irreducible duality in the normative conceptualisation of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her agency, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her well-being. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a persons agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the persons agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of ones agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person does not require us to take the view that the persons success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a persons well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.Q.Read the sentences given below and choose the option that is best in accordance with the ideas in the passage.I.There is a need to distinguish between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person.II.A person can be conceptualised in terms of either agency or well-being.III. Agency is important, not just instrumentally, for the pursuit of well-being.

View answer

Read the following passage and provide appropriate answers.There is an essential and irreducible 'duality' in the normative conceptualization of an individual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her 'agency', recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her 'well-being'. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a person's agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to recognize the indisputable fact that the person's agency can well be geared to considerations not covered - or at least not fully covered - by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. Even though the use of one's agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assessment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting.To recognize the distinction between the 'agency aspect' and the 'well-being aspect' of a person does not require us to take the view that the person's success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve - perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person's well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being. There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation.The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.Q. Read the sentences given below and choose the option that is best in accordance with the ideas in the passage.I. There is a need to distinguish between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person.II. A person can be conceptualized in terms of either agency or well-being.III. A person is important, not just instrumentally, for the pursuit of wellbeing

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Verbal Ability (VA) & Reading Comprehension (RC)

Logical Reasoning (LR) and Data Interpretation (DI)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Top Courses for CAT

View all

In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Statement: Should the parliament elections in India be held on a single day throughout the country?Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to handle such elections.II. Yes, this will help the commission to concentrate on a single day for election related issues.III. No, some other countries hold such elections spread over several days.a) None is strongb) Only I is strongc) Only II is strongd) Only III is stronge) Only I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam