Question Description
DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS for questions: Each of the following questions has a paragraph which is followed by four alternative summaries. Choose the alternative that best captures the essence of the paragraph.When Thomas Steitz, Ada Yonath, and Venkatraman Ramakrishnan were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their research, in 2009, they acknowledged a debt. Without the work of two of the Physics Laureates that year, the chemists would have lacked the CCD detectors, or high-quality imaging hardware, they used to model and image ribosomes, sites of protein synthesis within a cell. Collaboration in science has become commonplace today, and we’re seeing the benefits. But many of its fruits are unintended. As Ramakrishnan points out, inventions in one discipline can build on – and spur – basic research in many others, often unwittingly. It’s a virtuous cycle, and scientists take joy in exploiting all of it. “Scientists are very promiscuous,” he says, “and the good ones are the most promiscuous.”a)Collaboration has unexpected windfalls in that inventions in one discipline of science trigger research in other disciplines, and good scientists know how to exploit that.b)There is a certain level of promiscuity that good scientists involve in when they unwittingly exploit inventions in other disciplines for their own gain.c)Scientists can find success only by willingly exploiting developments in other disciplines of science.d)Nobel Prize winners often benefit from path breaking work in other disciplines of science and it is only justified that they acknowledge the debt of collaboration.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.