Question Description
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageThe complexion of the world economy has changed beyond recognition.A few years ago, the Soviet Union and its friends used to accuse the World Bank, IMF and other international institutions as the promoters of economic imperialism of USA and its allies and in the same breath as the bloodsuckers of the poorer member-countries. GATT, for them, was a rich man’s club. In their views, transnational corporations were worse than the dreaded buccaneers.These corporations worked exclusively for the benefit of parent countries and exploited the host countries thoroughly. Economic relations of communist countries remained chiefly confined within the four walls of communism. However, it crossed over to some third world countries as well.GATT has stopped exploiting its host countries.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.