Question Description
Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question below is given a passage followed by several inferences. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.PassageIndia and other developing countries, while expressing their commitment to the upgradation of labour standards, have been resisting the move to link international trade, not only with labour standards, but also with environmental concerns and human rights. The move was set afoot on the successful conclusion of the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations with a proposal for the inclusion of a social clause in the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which succeeds GATT. Later, on stiff opposition to the move on the ground that the matter did not fall in the area of trade, a proposal was mooted for the inclusion of a social clause in ILO.India claims that environmental issue and trade are uncorrelated.a) if you think the inference is ‘definitely true’;b) if you think the inference is ‘probably true’ though not definitely true in the light of the facts given;c) if you think the ‘data are inadequate’, i.e., from the facts given you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false;d) if you think the inference is ‘probably false’ though not definitely false in the light of the facts given; ande) if you think the inference is ‘definitely false’, i.e. it contradicts the given facts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.