Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: Each set of questions in this sect...

Join the Discussion on the App

Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided this dilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

a)
Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.
b)
There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.
c)
Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.
d)
Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

CLAT Practice Test - 10

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reaso...

This question asks you to determine which response most strengthens the argument. In approaching such questions, you should identify the conclusion of the argument, and find the response that, if true, adds to the argument's support for its conclusion. Option (a) is correct. The argument says that automobile manufacturers addressed the trade-off between efficiency and safety by designing two kinds of cars, a more efficient but less safe car for local travel, and a less efficient but safer car for long-distance travel.
Further, the argument says that "most automobile traffic is local," and then draws its conclusion that "a net savings in fuel use was achieved [with the two car designs] with no loss in safety." The more people actually use cars in the way that leads to greatest efficiency and safety, the stronger the argument is: That is, to the extent that people actually use the more efficient cars for local travel and the safer cars for long-distance travel, the argument is stronger.
Response (a) strengthens the argument by showing that it is at least possible that most people do use their cars in that way and is the best answer. (b) is incorrect. At best, the increased number of cars using high-speed highways is essentially irrelevant to the argument. Option (c) is also incorrect. Without further information, it is not clear how the truth of this statement would bear on the argument. According to the passage, lighter cars are more fuel-efficient, but less safe. From response (c) alone, we cannot tell to what extent its truth would affect the net relationship between safety and fuel efficiency. (d) is incorrect. The relationship of commercial vehicles to the situation described in the passage does not arise in the argument; thus, this response is, without further information, irrelevant to the argument.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The 2019 Act has brought in some major changes and provides for more protection to the consumers in pari materia to the earlier 1986 Act which can be seen from the comprehensive definition provided for the terms consumer and unfair trade practice. The 2019 Act expands the scope of the definition of consumer so as to include the consumers involved in online transactions and it now squarely covers the e-commerce businesses within its ambit. The 2019 Act has also widened the definition of unfair trade practices as compared to the 1986 Act which now includes within its ambit online misleading advertisements; the practice of not issuing bill/memo for the goods and services; failing to take back defective goods or deactivate defective services and refund the amount within the stipulated time mentioned in the bill or memo or within 30 days in the absence of such stipulation; and disclosing personal information of a consumer unless such disclosure is in accordance with law.The 2019 Act has also introduced the concept of unfair contract which includes those contracts which favour the manufacturers or service providers and are against the interest of the consumers such as contracts requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of contractual obligations; imposing any penalty on the consumer for a breach of the contract, which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract. Such unfair consumer contracts are now covered under the 2019 Act and a complaint in this regard can now be filed by a consumer.Another major introduction in the 2019 Act is the concept of product liability which covers within its ambit the product manufacturer, product service provider and product seller, for any claim for compensation. The term product liability is defined by the 2019 Act as the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, related to the product to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product manufactured or sold or by deficiency in services relating to the product. Also, the product seller has now been defined to include a person who is involved in placing the product for a commercial purpose and as such would include e-commerce platforms as well. Therefore, the ground commonly taken by e-commerce websites that they merely act as platforms or aggregators will now not be tenable before the court anymore. There are increased liability risks for manufacturers as compared to product service providers and product sellers, considering that under the 2019 Act, manufacturers will be liable in product liability action even where they successfully prove that they were not negligent or fraudulent in making the express warranty of a product. However, certain exceptions have been provided under the 2019 Act from liability claims, such as, that the product seller will not be liable where the product has been misused, altered or modified.Q.Biru fancy dress house provides fancy dresses on rent for all kinds of events. Seema rented a dress for an event. Biru asked for a security deposit for Rs. 5000, which was double the price of the dress to be rented, which was unreasonable. Seema filed a suit under the ambit of the Consumer Protection Bill, 2019. Decide.

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The 2019 Act has brought in some major changes and provides for more protection to the consumers in pari materia to the earlier 1986 Act which can be seen from the comprehensive definition provided for the terms consumer and unfair trade practice. The 2019 Act expands the scope of the definition of consumer so as to include the consumers involved in online transactions and it now squarely covers the e-commerce businesses within its ambit. The 2019 Act has also widened the definition of unfair trade practices as compared to the 1986 Act which now includes within its ambit online misleading advertisements; the practice of not issuing bill/memo for the goods and services; failing to take back defective goods or deactivate defective services and refund the amount within the stipulated time mentioned in the bill or memo or within 30 days in the absence of such stipulation; and disclosing personal information of a consumer unless such disclosure is in accordance with law.The 2019 Act has also introduced the concept of unfair contract which includes those contracts which favour the manufacturers or service providers and are against the interest of the consumers such as contracts requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of contractual obligations; imposing any penalty on the consumer for a breach of the contract, which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract. Such unfair consumer contracts are now covered under the 2019 Act and a complaint in this regard can now be filed by a consumer.Another major introduction in the 2019 Act is the concept of product liability which covers within its ambit the product manufacturer, product service provider and product seller, for any claim for compensation. The term product liability is defined by the 2019 Act as the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, related to the product to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product manufactured or sold or by deficiency in services relating to the product. Also, the product seller has now been defined to include a person who is involved in placing the product for a commercial purpose and as such would include e-commerce platforms as well. Therefore, the ground commonly taken by e-commerce websites that they merely act as platforms or aggregators will now not be tenable before the court anymore. There are increased liability risks for manufacturers as compared to product service providers and product sellers, considering that under the 2019 Act, manufacturers will be liable in product liability action even where they successfully prove that they were not negligent or fraudulent in making the express warranty of a product. However, certain exceptions have been provided under the 2019 Act from liability claims, such as, that the product seller will not be liable where the product has been misused, altered or modified.Q.Zia ordered a dress of white colour from Dress.com for her sisters wedding on 1stApril. She received the package on 1stMarch and didnt open it until the day of wedding. When she opened the package, she found that the dress had a brown stain on it. The bill had no mention of the return policy, so she applied for the return. Decide.

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The 2019 Act has brought in some major changes and provides for more protection to the consumers in pari materia to the earlier 1986 Act which can be seen from the comprehensive definition provided for the terms consumer and unfair trade practice. The 2019 Act expands the scope of the definition of consumer so as to include the consumers involved in online transactions and it now squarely covers the e-commerce businesses within its ambit. The 2019 Act has also widened the definition of unfair trade practices as compared to the 1986 Act which now includes within its ambit online misleading advertisements; the practice of not issuing bill/memo for the goods and services; failing to take back defective goods or deactivate defective services and refund the amount within the stipulated time mentioned in the bill or memo or within 30 days in the absence of such stipulation; and disclosing personal information of a consumer unless such disclosure is in accordance with law.The 2019 Act has also introduced the concept of unfair contract which includes those contracts which favour the manufacturers or service providers and are against the interest of the consumers such as contracts requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of contractual obligations; imposing any penalty on the consumer for a breach of the contract, which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract. Such unfair consumer contracts are now covered under the 2019 Act and a complaint in this regard can now be filed by a consumer.Another major introduction in the 2019 Act is the concept of product liability which covers within its ambit the product manufacturer, product service provider and product seller, for any claim for compensation. The term product liability is defined by the 2019 Act as the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, related to the product to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product manufactured or sold or by deficiency in services relating to the product. Also, the product seller has now been defined to include a person who is involved in placing the product for a commercial purpose and as such would include e-commerce platforms as well. Therefore, the ground commonly taken by e-commerce websites that they merely act as platforms or aggregators will now not be tenable before the court anymore. There are increased liability risks for manufacturers as compared to product service providers and product sellers, considering that under the 2019 Act, manufacturers will be liable in product liability action even where they successfully prove that they were not negligent or fraudulent in making the express warranty of a product. However, certain exceptions have been provided under the 2019 Act from liability claims, such as, that the product seller will not be liable where the product has been misused, altered or modified.Q.A strawberry flavoured protein shake was manufactured by "Shakes n Shop". The protein shake was meant to be taken with just curd. Sonia took the shake with milk and got a sore throat. Sonia filed a suit against "Shakes n Shop". Decide.

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The 2019 Act has brought in some major changes and provides for more protection to the consumers in pari materia to the earlier 1986 Act which can be seen from the comprehensive definition provided for the terms consumer and unfair trade practice. The 2019 Act expands the scope of the definition of consumer so as to include the consumers involved in online transactions and it now squarely covers the e-commerce businesses within its ambit. The 2019 Act has also widened the definition of unfair trade practices as compared to the 1986 Act which now includes within its ambit online misleading advertisements; the practice of not issuing bill/memo for the goods and services; failing to take back defective goods or deactivate defective services and refund the amount within the stipulated time mentioned in the bill or memo or within 30 days in the absence of such stipulation; and disclosing personal information of a consumer unless such disclosure is in accordance with law.The 2019 Act has also introduced the concept of unfair contract which includes those contracts which favour the manufacturers or service providers and are against the interest of the consumers such as contracts requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of contractual obligations; imposing any penalty on the consumer for a breach of the contract, which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract. Such unfair consumer contracts are now covered under the 2019 Act and a complaint in this regard can now be filed by a consumer.Another major introduction in the 2019 Act is the concept of product liability which covers within its ambit the product manufacturer, product service provider and product seller, for any claim for compensation. The term product liability is defined by the 2019 Act as the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, related to the product to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product manufactured or sold or by deficiency in services relating to the product. Also, the product seller has now been defined to include a person who is involved in placing the product for a commercial purpose and as such would include e-commerce platforms as well. Therefore, the ground commonly taken by e-commerce websites that they merely act as platforms or aggregators will now not be tenable before the court anymore. There are increased liability risks for manufacturers as compared to product service providers and product sellers, considering that under the 2019 Act, manufacturers will be liable in product liability action even where they successfully prove that they were not negligent or fraudulent in making the express warranty of a product. However, certain exceptions have been provided under the 2019 Act from liability claims, such as, that the product seller will not be liable where the product has been misused, altered or modified.Q.Stinga, a yogurt company, advertises its online product claiming that it boosts immunity and keeps the person healthy as it contains a special kind of bacteria. Zia filed a case against Stinga that it has misled the consumers.

View answer

The question is based on the reasoning and arguments, or facts and principles set out in the passage. Some of these principles may not be true in the real or legal sense, yet you must conclusively assume that they are true for the purpose. Please answer the question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the passage. Do not rely on any principle of law other than the ones supplied to you, and do not assume any facts other than those supplied to you when answering the question. Please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.The 2019 Act has brought in some major changes and provides for more protection to the consumers in pari materia to the earlier 1986 Act which can be seen from the comprehensive definition provided for the terms consumer and unfair trade practice. The 2019 Act expands the scope of the definition of consumer so as to include the consumers involved in online transactions and it now squarely covers the e-commerce businesses within its ambit. The 2019 Act has also widened the definition of unfair trade practices as compared to the 1986 Act which now includes within its ambit online misleading advertisements; the practice of not issuing bill/memo for the goods and services; failing to take back defective goods or deactivate defective services and refund the amount within the stipulated time mentioned in the bill or memo or within 30 days in the absence of such stipulation; and disclosing personal information of a consumer unless such disclosure is in accordance with law.The 2019 Act has also introduced the concept of unfair contract which includes those contracts which favour the manufacturers or service providers and are against the interest of the consumers such as contracts requiring manifestly excessive security deposits to be given by a consumer for the performance of contractual obligations; imposing any penalty on the consumer for a breach of the contract, which is wholly disproportionate to the loss occurred due to such breach to the other party to the contract. Such unfair consumer contracts are now covered under the 2019 Act and a complaint in this regard can now be filed by a consumer.Another major introduction in the 2019 Act is the concept of product liability which covers within its ambit the product manufacturer, product service provider and product seller, for any claim for compensation. The term product liability is defined by the 2019 Act as the responsibility of a product manufacturer or product seller, of any product or service, related to the product to compensate for any harm caused to a consumer by such defective product manufactured or sold or by deficiency in services relating to the product. Also, the product seller has now been defined to include a person who is involved in placing the product for a commercial purpose and as such would include e-commerce platforms as well. Therefore, the ground commonly taken by e-commerce websites that they merely act as platforms or aggregators will now not be tenable before the court anymore. There are increased liability risks for manufacturers as compared to product service providers and product sellers, considering that under the 2019 Act, manufacturers will be liable in product liability action even where they successfully prove that they were not negligent or fraudulent in making the express warranty of a product. However, certain exceptions have been provided under the 2019 Act from liability claims, such as, that the product seller will not be liable where the product has been misused, altered or modified.Q.A milk company, selling Parag milk packets of 500 ml, actually delivers only 400 ml through its retailer. The buyer wants compensation. Decide.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Each set of questions in this section is based on the reasoning and arguments set out in the preceding passage. Please answer each question on the basis of what is stated or implied in the corresponding passage. Do not rely on any information or facts other than the ones supplied to you. In some instances, more than one option may be the answer to the question; in such a case, please choose the option that most accurately and comprehensively answers the question.Court: Consider Google Maps. An individual today accepts the fact that an entity uses their data so that a satellite can track them. What is the problem with a unique identity number like Aadhar for a citizen then? Why does an individual have a problem if the state uses their personal data through this number for various welfare schemes?Petitioner: There is a difference between giving consent toan entity and being compelled to share data. Also, it is not clear for what purpose their information is being used by the government.Court: All our data is anyway with private entities. So does the interpolation of Aadhaar number make any difference?Petitioner: I agree that we are in a networked world. But to what extent in the networked world should the state or the private entities seek information? The court needs to decide this.Automobile manufacturers who began two decades ago to design passenger vehicles that were more fuelefficient faced a dilemma in the fact that the lighter, more efficient vehicles were less safe on high-speed highways. However, the manufacturers avoided thisdilemma by producing two types of passenger vehicles: a lighter vehicle for medium- speed, local transportation, and a heavier, safer vehicle for longdistance travel. Since most automobile traffic is local, a net savings in fuel use was achieved with no loss in safety.Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?a)Most households whose members do any longdistance driving own at least two passenger vehicles.b)There are more cars using high-speed highways today than there were two decades ago.c)Even large automobiles are lighter today than similar-sized vehicles were two decades ago.d)Most high-speed highways are used by both commercial vehicles and passenger vehicles.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam