What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses CLAT Exam CLAT Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > What is the maximum value of deforming force ...

What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?

a)
Elasticity
b)
Strain
c)
Elastic Limit
d)
Stress

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material sh...

Understanding Elastic Limit
The elastic limit is a critical concept in materials science and mechanics, defining the threshold up to which a material can deform elastically. Beyond this limit, the material will not return to its original shape when the deforming force is removed.
Key Points about Elastic Limit:
- Definition: The elastic limit refers to the maximum stress or deforming force that a material can withstand while still returning to its original shape after the load is removed.
- Elastic Deformation: Within the elastic limit, materials exhibit elastic deformation, where they can stretch or compress without permanent changes in their structure.
- Plastic Deformation: Once the applied force exceeds the elastic limit, the material undergoes plastic deformation, meaning it will not return to its original shape, resulting in permanent changes.
Importance of Elastic Limit:
- Material Selection: Understanding the elastic limit is crucial for engineers and designers to select appropriate materials for specific applications, ensuring they can withstand loads without permanent deformation.
- Safety and Performance: Knowing the elastic limit helps in assessing the safety and performance of structures and components, preventing failure due to excessive stress.
Real-World Applications:
- Construction: In buildings and bridges, materials must be chosen based on their elastic limits to ensure they can support expected loads without undergoing irreversible deformation.
- Mechanical Components: Springs and other mechanical parts rely on their elastic properties, making it essential to operate within their elastic limits for effective functionality.
In summary, the elastic limit is the maximum force or stress a material can endure while retaining its elastic properties. Understanding this concept is vital for effective engineering and material science practices.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test - Physics - 3
20 Ques | 20 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material sh...

The Maximum Extent to which a solid may be stretched without permanent alteration of size or shape.

Answer this doubt

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow.The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. This unfinished part of his experiment was perhaps even more difficult to achieve than the achievement of political freedom. In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. In establishing a social order on this pattern, there was a strong possibility of a conflict arising between diverse groups and classes of our own people. Experience shows that man values his possessions even more than his life because in the former he sees the means for perpetuation and survival of his descendants even after his body is reduced to ashes. A new order cannot be established without radically changing the mind and attitude of men towards property and, at some stage or the other, the haves have to yield place to the have-nots. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force.In the ultimate analysis it is difficult, if not impossible, to say that the instinct to possess has been rooted out or that it will not reappear in an even worse form under a different guise. It may even be that, like a gas kept confined within containers under great pressure, or water held back by a big dam, once the barrier breaks, the reaction will one day sweep back with a violence equal in extent and intensity to what was used to establish and maintain the outward egalitarian form. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction.The root cause of class conflict is possessiveness or the acquisitive instinct. So long as the ideal that is to be achieved is one of securing the maximum material satisfaction, possessiveness is neither suppressed nor eliminated but grows on what it feeds. Nor does it cease to be possessiveness, whether it is confined to only a few or is shared by many.If egalitarianism is to endure, it has to be based not on the possession of the maximum material goods by a few or by all but on voluntary, enlightened renunciation of those goods which cannot be shared by others or can be enjoyed only at the expense of others. This calls for substitution of material values by purely spiritual ones. The paradise of material satisfaction, which is sometimes equated withprogress these days, neither spells peace nor progress. Mahatma Gandhi has shown us how the acquisitive instinct inherent in man can be transmuted by the adoption of the ideal of trusteeship by those who have for the benefit of all those who have not so that, instead of leading to exploitation and conflict, it would become a means and incentive for the amelioration and progress of society respectively.Q.Which of the following conclusions can be deduced from the passage?

View answer

Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow.The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. This unfinished part of his experiment was perhaps even more difficult to achieve than the achievement of political freedom. In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. In establishing a social order on this pattern, there was a strong possibility of a conflict arising between diverse groups and classes of our own people. Experience shows that man values his possessions even more than his life because in the former he sees the means for perpetuation and survival of his descendants even after his body is reduced to ashes. A new order cannot be established without radically changing the mind and attitude of men towards property and, at some stage or the other, the haves have to yield place to the have-nots. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force.In the ultimate analysis it is difficult, if not impossible, to say that the instinct to possess has been rooted out or that it will not reappear in an even worse form under a different guise. It may even be that, like a gas kept confined within containers under great pressure, or water held back by a big dam, once the barrier breaks, the reaction will one day sweep back with a violence equal in extent and intensity to what was used to establish and maintain the outward egalitarian form. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction.The root cause of class conflict is possessiveness or the acquisitive instinct. So long as the ideal that is to be achieved is one of securing the maximum material satisfaction, possessiveness is neither suppressed nor eliminated but grows on what it feeds. Nor does it cease to be possessiveness, whether it is confined to only a few or is shared by many.If egalitarianism is to endure, it has to be based not on the possession of the maximum material goods by a few or by all but on voluntary, enlightened renunciation of those goods which cannot be shared by others or can be enjoyed only at the expense of others. This calls for substitution of material values by purely spiritual ones. The paradise of material satisfaction, which is sometimes equated withprogress these days, neither spells peace nor progress. Mahatma Gandhi has shown us how the acquisitive instinct inherent in man can be transmuted by the adoption of the ideal of trusteeship by those who have for the benefit of all those who have not so that, instead of leading to exploitation and conflict, it would become a means and incentive for the amelioration and progress of society respectively.Q.According to the passage, what does "adoption of the ideal of trusteeship" mean?

View answer

Read the given passage carefully and attempt the questions that follow.The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. This unfinished part of his experiment was perhaps even more difficult to achieve than the achievement of political freedom. In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. In establishing a social order on this pattern, there was a strong possibility of a conflict arising between diverse groups and classes of our own people. Experience shows that man values his possessions even more than his life because in the former he sees the means for perpetuation and survival of his descendants even after his body is reduced to ashes. A new order cannot be established without radically changing the mind and attitude of men towards property and, at some stage or the other, the haves have to yield place to the have-nots. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force.In the ultimate analysis it is difficult, if not impossible, to say that the instinct to possess has been rooted out or that it will not reappear in an even worse form under a different guise. It may even be that, like a gas kept confined within containers under great pressure, or water held back by a big dam, once the barrier breaks, the reaction will one day sweep back with a violence equal in extent and intensity to what was used to establish and maintain the outward egalitarian form. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction.The root cause of class conflict is possessiveness or the acquisitive instinct. So long as the ideal that is to be achieved is one of securing the maximum material satisfaction, possessiveness is neither suppressed nor eliminated but grows on what it feeds. Nor does it cease to be possessiveness, whether it is confined to only a few or is shared by many.If egalitarianism is to endure, it has to be based not on the possession of the maximum material goods by a few or by all but on voluntary, enlightened renunciation of those goods which cannot be shared by others or can be enjoyed only at the expense of others. This calls for substitution of material values by purely spiritual ones. The paradise of material satisfaction, which is sometimes equated withprogress these days, neither spells peace nor progress. Mahatma Gandhi has shown us how the acquisitive instinct inherent in man can be transmuted by the adoption of the ideal of trusteeship by those who have for the benefit of all those who have not so that, instead of leading to exploitation and conflict, it would become a means and incentive for the amelioration and progress of society respectively.Q.Which of the following statements is not true in the context of the passage?

View answer

Principles:I: The term immovable property has been defined in the General Clauses Act, 1897, to include land, benefits arising out of land and things attached to the earth or permanently fastened to things attached to the earth.II: Lease, mortgage, charge, rent and other such benefits are examples of immovable property.III: Under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a material is considered to be attached to the earth if it is rooted in the earth (liketrees, shrubs), or if the material is embedded in the earth or placed on the land for permanent beneficial enjoyment, rather thanmere convenience.Explanation:Everything else, other than the things covered in the above principles, is considered to be movableproperty.Facts:Mr. Chandwani is a builder and he is building a stone wall for a client, for which he asks for the delivery of stones and boulders. Now, since the client is out of station, for the time being, Mr. Chandwani gets the boulders delivered to his own house and stacks them up to form a stone wall in his garden. Mr. Chandwani lives on a plot of land with a huge bungalow, a garden and a greenhouse. Which of the following will be considered to be immovable property in this case?(i) The plot of land(ii) The garden(iii) The greenhouse(iv) The stone wall

View answer

Read the passage and answer the following question.The impact of climate change is there for real. India has experienced the vagaries of weather with the El Nino current in the Pacific Ocean affecting its monsoon rainfall. Countries like Bangladesh face a threat from the rising sea level, a result of global warming. The United States experienced less snowfall this winter, while Australia witnessed raging bushfires with summer temperatures higher than normal. The report by the US-based National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOA

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

English for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Crash Course for CLAT

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

English for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

View all

Question Description
What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the maximum value of deforming force up to which a material shows elastic property and above which the material loses it?a)Elasticityb)Strainc)Elastic Limitd)StressCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.