All Courses
Explore Courses CLAT Exam CLAT Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Directions: In this question below is given a... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit. 
Statement:
‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.
Assumptions: 
I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.
II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.
  • a)
    If only assumption I is implicit 
  • b)
    If only assumption II is implicit
  • c)
    If either I or II is implicit 
  • d)
    If neither I nor II is implicit 
  • e)
    If both I and II are implicit
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by tw...
Mr Prakash is clearly connecting ‘being receptive to change’ and ‘being intellectually superior’ since he uses the words ‘as’ to connect these two traits (as we’re more receptive to change). Thus, it is a valid assumption. However, no connection or co-relation has been shown between use of gadgets and intellectual superiority. Thus, II is not an assumption in this statement.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Intellectuals a category that includes academics, opinion journalists, and think tank experts are freaks. I do not mean that in a disrespectful way. I myself have spent most of my life in one of the three roles mentioned above. I have even been accused of being a public intellectual, which sounds too much like public nuisance or even public enemy for my taste.My point is that people who specialize in the life of ideas tend to be extremely atypical of their societies. They are freaks in a statistical sense. For generations, populists of various kinds have argued that intellectuals are unworldly individuals out of touch with the experiences and values of most of their fellow citizens. While anti-intellectual populists have often been wrong about the gold standard or the single tax or other issues, by and large they have been right about intellectuals.The terms intellectual and intelligentsia arose around the same time in the 19th century. Before the industrial revolution, the few people in advanced civilizations paid to read, write, and debate were mostly either clerics like medieval Christian priests, monks, or secular scribes like Confucian mandarins who worked for kings or aristocrats, or, as in the city-states of ancient Greece, teachers whose students were mostly young men of the upper classes.The replacement of agrarian civilization by industrial capitalism created two new homes for thinkers, both funded directly or indirectly by the newly enriched capitalist elite. One was the nonprofit sectorthe university and the nonprofit think tank founded chiefly by gifts from the tycoons who lent these institutions their names:Stanford University, the Ford Foundation.Then there was bohemia, populated largely by the downwardly-mobile sons and daughters of the rich, spending down inherited bourgeois family fortunes while dabbling in the arts and philosophy and politics and denouncing the evils of the bourgeoisie.Whether they are institutionalized professors and policy wonks or free-spirited bohemians, the intellectuals of the industrial era are as different from the mass of people in contemporary industrial societies as the clerics, scribes, mandarins, and itinerant philosophers of old were from the peasant or slave majorities in their societies.To begin with, there is the matter of higher education. Only about 30 percent of American adults have a four-year undergraduate degree. The number of those with advanced graduate or professional degrees is around one in ten. As a BA is a minimal requirement for employment in most intellectual occupations, the pool from which scholars, writers, and policy experts is drawn is already a small one. It is even more exclusive in practice, because the children of the rich and affluent are overrepresented among those who go to college.Then there is location. There have only been a few world capitals of bohemia, generally in big, expensive cities that appeal to bohemian rich kids. In the U.S., the geographic options for think tank scholars also tend to be limited to a few expensive cities, like Washington, D.C. and New York. Of the different breeds of the American intellectual, professors have the most diverse habitat, given the number and geographic distribution of universities across the American continent. Like college education, geographic mobility in the service of personal career ambitions is common only within a highly atypical social and economic elite.Q.According to the author of the passage, the intellectuals of the industrial area are different from the mass of people in contemporary industrial societies by virtue of

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Intellectuals a category that includes academics, opinion journalists, and think tank experts are freaks. I do not mean that in a disrespectful way. I myself have spent most of my life in one of the three roles mentioned above. I have even been accused of being a public intellectual, which sounds too much like public nuisance or even public enemy for my taste.My point is that people who specialize in the life of ideas tend to be extremely atypical of their societies. They are freaks in a statistical sense. For generations, populists of various kinds have argued that intellectuals are unworldly individuals out of touch with the experiences and values of most of their fellow citizens. While anti-intellectual populists have often been wrong about the gold standard or the single tax or other issues, by and large they have been right about intellectuals.The terms intellectual and intelligentsia arose around the same time in the 19th century. Before the industrial revolution, the few people in advanced civilizations paid to read, write, and debate were mostly either clerics like medieval Christian priests, monks, or secular scribes like Confucian mandarins who worked for kings or aristocrats, or, as in the city-states of ancient Greece, teachers whose students were mostly young men of the upper classes.The replacement of agrarian civilization by industrial capitalism created two new homes for thinkers, both funded directly or indirectly by the newly enriched capitalist elite. One was the nonprofit sectorthe university and the nonprofit think tank founded chiefly by gifts from the tycoons who lent these institutions their names:Stanford University, the Ford Foundation.Then there was bohemia, populated largely by the downwardly-mobile sons and daughters of the rich, spending down inherited bourgeois family fortunes while dabbling in the arts and philosophy and politics and denouncing the evils of the bourgeoisie.Whether they are institutionalized professors and policy wonks or free-spirited bohemians, the intellectuals of the industrial era are as different from the mass of people in contemporary industrial societies as the clerics, scribes, mandarins, and itinerant philosophers of old were from the peasant or slave majorities in their societies.To begin with, there is the matter of higher education. Only about 30 percent of American adults have a four-year undergraduate degree. The number of those with advanced graduate or professional degrees is around one in ten. As a BA is a minimal requirement for employment in most intellectual occupations, the pool from which scholars, writers, and policy experts is drawn is already a small one. It is even more exclusive in practice, because the children of the rich and affluent are overrepresented among those who go to college.Then there is location. There have only been a few world capitals of bohemia, generally in big, expensive cities that appeal to bohemian rich kids. In the U.S., the geographic options for think tank scholars also tend to be limited to a few expensive cities, like Washington, D.C. and New York. Of the different breeds of the American intellectual, professors have the most diverse habitat, given the number and geographic distribution of universities across the American continent. Like college education, geographic mobility in the service of personal career ambitions is common only within a highly atypical social and economic elite.Q.According to the author of the passage

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Intellectuals a category that includes academics, opinion journalists, and think tank experts are freaks. I do not mean that in a disrespectful way. I myself have spent most of my life in one of the three roles mentioned above. I have even been accused of being a public intellectual, which sounds too much like public nuisance or even public enemy for my taste.My point is that people who specialize in the life of ideas tend to be extremely atypical of their societies. They are freaks in a statistical sense. For generations, populists of various kinds have argued that intellectuals are unworldly individuals out of touch with the experiences and values of most of their fellow citizens. While anti-intellectual populists have often been wrong about the gold standard or the single tax or other issues, by and large they have been right about intellectuals.The terms intellectual and intelligentsia arose around the same time in the 19th century. Before the industrial revolution, the few people in advanced civilizations paid to read, write, and debate were mostly either clerics like medieval Christian priests, monks, or secular scribes like Confucian mandarins who worked for kings or aristocrats, or, as in the city-states of ancient Greece, teachers whose students were mostly young men of the upper classes.The replacement of agrarian civilization by industrial capitalism created two new homes for thinkers, both funded directly or indirectly by the newly enriched capitalist elite. One was the nonprofit sectorthe university and the nonprofit think tank founded chiefly by gifts from the tycoons who lent these institutions their names:Stanford University, the Ford Foundation.Then there was bohemia, populated largely by the downwardly-mobile sons and daughters of the rich, spending down inherited bourgeois family fortunes while dabbling in the arts and philosophy and politics and denouncing the evils of the bourgeoisie.Whether they are institutionalized professors and policy wonks or free-spirited bohemians, the intellectuals of the industrial era are as different from the mass of people in contemporary industrial societies as the clerics, scribes, mandarins, and itinerant philosophers of old were from the peasant or slave majorities in their societies.To begin with, there is the matter of higher education. Only about 30 percent of American adults have a four-year undergraduate degree. The number of those with advanced graduate or professional degrees is around one in ten. As a BA is a minimal requirement for employment in most intellectual occupations, the pool from which scholars, writers, and policy experts is drawn is already a small one. It is even more exclusive in practice, because the children of the rich and affluent are overrepresented among those who go to college.Then there is location. There have only been a few world capitals of bohemia, generally in big, expensive cities that appeal to bohemian rich kids. In the U.S., the geographic options for think tank scholars also tend to be limited to a few expensive cities, like Washington, D.C. and New York. Of the different breeds of the American intellectual, professors have the most diverse habitat, given the number and geographic distribution of universities across the American continent. Like college education, geographic mobility in the service of personal career ambitions is common only within a highly atypical social and economic elite.Q.Identify the statements that are correct as per the information provided in the passage.I. The term Intellectuals came into existence with the industrial revolution.II. Industrial revolution contributed to the creation of new places for intellectuals.III. Intellectuals lead to the industrial revolution.

Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Intellectuals a category that includes academics, opinion journalists, and think tank experts are freaks. I do not mean that in a disrespectful way. I myself have spent most of my life in one of the three roles mentioned above. I have even been accused of being a public intellectual, which sounds too much like public nuisance or even public enemy for my taste.My point is that people who specialize in the life of ideas tend to be extremely atypical of their societies. They are freaks in a statistical sense. For generations, populists of various kinds have argued that intellectuals are unworldly individuals out of touch with the experiences and values of most of their fellow citizens. While anti-intellectual populists have often been wrong about the gold standard or the single tax or other issues, by and large they have been right about intellectuals.The terms intellectual and intelligentsia arose around the same time in the 19th century. Before the industrial revolution, the few people in advanced civilizations paid to read, write, and debate were mostly either clerics like medieval Christian priests, monks, or secular scribes like Confucian mandarins who worked for kings or aristocrats, or, as in the city-states of ancient Greece, teachers whose students were mostly young men of the upper classes.The replacement of agrarian civilization by industrial capitalism created two new homes for thinkers, both funded directly or indirectly by the newly enriched capitalist elite. One was the nonprofit sectorthe university and the nonprofit think tank founded chiefly by gifts from the tycoons who lent these institutions their names:Stanford University, the Ford Foundation.Then there was bohemia, populated largely by the downwardly-mobile sons and daughters of the rich, spending down inherited bourgeois family fortunes while dabbling in the arts and philosophy and politics and denouncing the evils of the bourgeoisie.Whether they are institutionalized professors and policy wonks or free-spirited bohemians, the intellectuals of the industrial era are as different from the mass of people in contemporary industrial societies as the clerics, scribes, mandarins, and itinerant philosophers of old were from the peasant or slave majorities in their societies.To begin with, there is the matter of higher education. Only about 30 percent of American adults have a four-year undergraduate degree. The number of those with advanced graduate or professional degrees is around one in ten. As a BA is a minimal requirement for employment in most intellectual occupations, the pool from which scholars, writers, and policy experts is drawn is already a small one. It is even more exclusive in practice, because the children of the rich and affluent are overrepresented among those who go to college.Then there is location. There have only been a few world capitals of bohemia, generally in big, expensive cities that appeal to bohemian rich kids. In the U.S., the geographic options for think tank scholars also tend to be limited to a few expensive cities, like Washington, D.C. and New York. Of the different breeds of the American intellectual, professors have the most diverse habitat, given the number and geographic distribution of universities across the American continent. Like college education, geographic mobility in the service of personal career ambitions is common only within a highly atypical social and economic elite.Q.A suitable title for the passage is

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Crash Course for CLAT
Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly
English for CLAT
CLAT Mock Test Series 2026
Question Description
Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumptions is implicit.Statement:‘I do not think the use or misuse of expensive gadgets, modern technology and the likes defines our generation. On the other hand, we are also intellectually superior than our previous generations as we’re more receptive to change, we like experimenting and the gadgets and technology are just the culmination of such traits.’– Mr Prakash during a debate on ‘Whether we control technology or the technology controls us’.Assumptions:I. Being receptive to change and continuous experimentation leads to intellectual superiority.II. The use of expensive gadgets leads to intellectual superiority.a)If only assumption I is implicitb)If only assumption II is implicitc)If either I or II is implicitd)If neither I nor II is implicite)If both I and II are implicitCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Legal Reasoning for CLAT
Crash Course for CLAT
Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly
English for CLAT
CLAT Mock Test Series 2026
Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup