UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >   The order/direction of making mandatory for ... Start Learning for Free
The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?
  • a)
    Election Commission of India
  • b)
    Supreme Court
  • c)
    Parliament
  • d)
    The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesti...
The ECI only implements whatever directives are framed. It does not have the power to issue such powerful directives. This directive came out in a Supreme Court justice.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesti...
Explanation:

Background:
Before 2002, candidates contesting in elections were not required to disclose their criminal records, assets and liabilities. This led to the election of many candidates with criminal backgrounds and a lack of transparency in the election process.

Election Commission of India's Efforts:
In 2002, the Election Commission of India (ECI) took the initiative to change this by making it mandatory for candidates to file an affidavit giving details of their property and criminal cases pending against them. The ECI first introduced this provision for candidates contesting in the 2002 assembly elections in Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat. This move was seen as a step towards ensuring transparency and accountability in the election process.

Supreme Court's Order:
In 2003, the Supreme Court of India gave a historic judgment in the case of Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and Others. The court upheld the ECI's decision to make it mandatory for candidates to file an affidavit giving details of their property and criminal cases pending against them. The court also directed the ECI to ensure that the information provided by the candidates was made available to the public.

The Supreme Court's judgment was a significant milestone in the history of Indian democracy. It brought transparency to the election process and enabled voters to make more informed choices. Candidates with criminal records or those who had amassed wealth disproportionate to their known sources of income were no longer able to hide their records from the public.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the order/direction of making it mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by the Supreme Court of India in 2003. This decision has had a significant impact on the Indian election process and has brought about greater transparency and accountability.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

When millions of Indians vote in the 2014 elections, their ink-stained fingers marking another important moment in our democracy, we need to ask whether all citizens have been able to participate in these elections.Voters with disabilities have been an invisible minority to the Election Commission (EC), political parties and the public in general. In 2004, the Supreme Court, in Disabled Rights Group Vs. The ChiefElection Commissioner andAnr, laid down specific directions for the EC to implement at the time of voting. These directions were basic ramps at all voting sites, tactile and Braille buttons on EVMs and allowing voters to take companions for assistance when they cast their ballot. The EC wasted no time in sending these directions to all its state election commissioners, but the actual level of accessibility and voting in those elections did not dramatically improve.Now, 10 years later, we are at the same crossroads. In a recent audit of polling sites in Bangalore, it was found that most of the 7,700 sites were not accessible for voters with physical and locomotor disabilities. If we want to take voting rights seriously and ensure that our Constitution guarantees this right for every single person, we cannot ignore voters with disabilities.First, electoral participation for voters with disabilities is not only about voting. Free and fair electoral participation means access to electoral awareness programs and campaigns of the candidates and political parties, making campaign materials and speeches accessible. The websites ofthe EC, political parties and candidates should also be accessible. The SC has held that the right to know the background of a candidate is a fundamental right of a voter, so that she can make a rational decision while exercising the statutory right to vote. Thus, electors with disabilities have a fundamental right to get information about the backgrounds of candidates and parties in a format that is accessible. Unless such materials are available, a person will not be able to exercise her right to vote. The right to vote also begins with being able to register as a voter. The low number of voter registrations among people with disabilities is because most do not know how to get themselves registered as voters, do not get information about it and voter registration sites are not physically accessible. Second, the actual process of voting must be made smoother. The ECs measures to enable voting have been limited to building ramps at polling sites. These are important, and it is evident that even this simple measure is not fully complied with.Q.According to the passage, which of the following statements are true?1.Right to vote is a fundamental right2.Voters have a fundamental right to know relevant qualifications of candidates contesting in order to make a rational choice

Top Courses for UPSC

The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The order/direction of making mandatory for every candidate (contesting elections) to file an affidavit giving details of his property and criminal cases pending against him was given by?a)Election Commission of Indiab)Supreme Courtc)Parliamentd)The Prime Minister’s Office (PMO)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev