Question Description
Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In this section every question is appended with facts and principles, and multiple choice answers. You are required to read the facts carefully, then read the principles, apply the principles to the given facts and make a select one the option which is the most appropriate answer from the given choices Principles:I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Fuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Was B mistaken with regards to the identity of the consignment of the goods sent by A?a)No. A and B had contracted for the transaction of car fuel tanks. They agreed upon the same thing and hence there was no mistake.b)Yes. B had not contracted for buying the damaged goods.c)No. B was getting the consignment as desired by him. The change in the quality of the goods was an unintended injury.d)Yes. A should have informed B about the risks of transporting the goods.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.