Question Description
DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.II. Where a party to an agreement is under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is voidable.III. The subject matter of the contract is essential to every agreement and the parties will be liable for any damage incurred due to their negligence.Facts: A's company manufactured car fuel tanks. A entered into a contract with B to sell him a consignment of 100 Tuel tanks. A sent the consignment through ship on the designated date, place and time. Due to the bad weather during the journey, the consignment got damaged and it reached its destination a week late. B repudiated the contract.Did A's negligence cause the damage?a)Yes. He was not careful while sending out the consignment.b)Yes. A should have known about the risks of sending out the consignment through -a ship.c)No. A did not foresee such consequences of transporting the goods.d)No. The damage to the goods was caused by the bad weather during the journey. A was not liable.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.