CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In the following question consis...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.
Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?
Arguments:
I. No. It is a wasteful practice.
II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.
- a)Only argument I is strong
- b)Only argument II is strong
- c)Either I or II is strong
- d)Neither I nor II is strong
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followe...
Clearly, shifting agriculture is a practice in which a certain crop is grown on land and when it becomes infertile it is left bare and another piece of land is chosen. Clearly, it is a wasteful practice. So, the only argument I hold.
View all questions of this test
Hence, the correct option is (A).
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followe...
Argument I: No. It is a wasteful practice.
Shifting agriculture, also known as slash-and-burn agriculture or swidden agriculture, is a traditional farming method in which land is cleared by cutting down and burning vegetation, and crops are then cultivated on the cleared land for a few years until the soil fertility declines. The argument states that shifting agriculture is a wasteful practice.
Reasons supporting Argument I:
1. Soil degradation: Shifting agriculture involves clearing large areas of land, which leads to soil erosion and depletion of nutrients. As a result, the land becomes less fertile over time, making it difficult to sustain long-term agricultural productivity.
2. Loss of biodiversity: The practice of burning vegetation and clearing land disrupts natural ecosystems, leading to a loss of biodiversity. This loss of biodiversity can have negative consequences for the environment and local ecosystems.
3. Unsustainable farming method: Shifting agriculture is often practiced in remote and hilly areas where access to modern agricultural inputs and technologies is limited. The reliance on traditional farming methods without proper infrastructure and resources makes it an unsustainable practice.
Argument II: Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.
The second argument claims that modern methods of farming are too expensive, implying that shifting agriculture should be practiced instead.
Reasons supporting Argument II:
1. Cost of inputs: Modern farming methods require substantial investments in machinery, fertilizers, pesticides, and other inputs. These costs can be prohibitive for small-scale farmers or those with limited financial resources.
2. High dependency on external inputs: Modern farming methods often rely heavily on external inputs such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This dependency can lead to environmental pollution, health risks, and increased vulnerability to price fluctuations in the market.
3. Sustainability: Shifting agriculture, when practiced in a controlled and sustainable manner, can provide an alternative to the high input costs and environmental concerns associated with modern farming methods. It allows farmers to utilize natural resources and adapt to local conditions.
Conclusion:
Argument I is strong because it highlights the negative impacts of shifting agriculture, such as soil degradation and loss of biodiversity. These concerns are valid and need to be addressed in order to promote sustainable agricultural practices.
Argument II is weak as it does not provide a strong justification for practicing shifting agriculture. While it mentions the expense of modern farming methods, it does not consider the long-term sustainability and environmental impacts associated with shifting agriculture.
Overall, shifting agriculture should be discouraged due to its negative environmental and ecological consequences, and efforts should be made to promote more sustainable and efficient farming practices.
Shifting agriculture, also known as slash-and-burn agriculture or swidden agriculture, is a traditional farming method in which land is cleared by cutting down and burning vegetation, and crops are then cultivated on the cleared land for a few years until the soil fertility declines. The argument states that shifting agriculture is a wasteful practice.
Reasons supporting Argument I:
1. Soil degradation: Shifting agriculture involves clearing large areas of land, which leads to soil erosion and depletion of nutrients. As a result, the land becomes less fertile over time, making it difficult to sustain long-term agricultural productivity.
2. Loss of biodiversity: The practice of burning vegetation and clearing land disrupts natural ecosystems, leading to a loss of biodiversity. This loss of biodiversity can have negative consequences for the environment and local ecosystems.
3. Unsustainable farming method: Shifting agriculture is often practiced in remote and hilly areas where access to modern agricultural inputs and technologies is limited. The reliance on traditional farming methods without proper infrastructure and resources makes it an unsustainable practice.
Argument II: Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.
The second argument claims that modern methods of farming are too expensive, implying that shifting agriculture should be practiced instead.
Reasons supporting Argument II:
1. Cost of inputs: Modern farming methods require substantial investments in machinery, fertilizers, pesticides, and other inputs. These costs can be prohibitive for small-scale farmers or those with limited financial resources.
2. High dependency on external inputs: Modern farming methods often rely heavily on external inputs such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This dependency can lead to environmental pollution, health risks, and increased vulnerability to price fluctuations in the market.
3. Sustainability: Shifting agriculture, when practiced in a controlled and sustainable manner, can provide an alternative to the high input costs and environmental concerns associated with modern farming methods. It allows farmers to utilize natural resources and adapt to local conditions.
Conclusion:
Argument I is strong because it highlights the negative impacts of shifting agriculture, such as soil degradation and loss of biodiversity. These concerns are valid and need to be addressed in order to promote sustainable agricultural practices.
Argument II is weak as it does not provide a strong justification for practicing shifting agriculture. While it mentions the expense of modern farming methods, it does not consider the long-term sustainability and environmental impacts associated with shifting agriculture.
Overall, shifting agriculture should be discouraged due to its negative environmental and ecological consequences, and efforts should be made to promote more sustainable and efficient farming practices.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG argument and which is a WEAK Argument.Statement: Should shifting agriculture be practiced?Arguments:I. No. It is a wasteful practice.II. Yes. Modern methods of farming are too expensive.a)Only argument I is strongb)Only argument II is strongc)Either I or II is strongd)Neither I nor II is strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up
within 7 days!
within 7 days!
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup