Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 requires that a contract must be based on a lawful object and lawful consideration. Section 23 of the Act states that for an object to be lawful it must not be forbidden by law. Murder is an offence under Section 300 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Therefore, it is forbidden by law.

Validity of an Agreement to Kill

In this case, A and B have made an agreement where A has agreed to pay Rs. 50,000 to B if he kills C. Such an agreement is illegal and against public policy. Let us understand why.

Void Agreement

An agreement that is illegal or against public policy is void. In this case, the agreement between A and B is void because it involves the commission of a crime, which is punishable under the Indian Penal Code. The act of killing another person is an offence under the law, and any agreement that encourages or incentivizes such an act is illegal.

Against Public Policy

Agreements that are against public policy are those that are considered harmful to society or against the public interest. The agreement between A and B to kill C is against public policy because it encourages violence and undermines the rule of law. Such agreements are not enforceable by law, and any attempt to enforce them is punishable.

Considered a Crime

The act of killing another person is a crime under the Indian Penal Code. Such an act is punishable under the law, and any agreement that encourages or incentivizes such an act is illegal. Therefore, the agreement between A and B to kill C is a criminal offence, and both parties can be held liable for their actions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the agreement between A and B to kill C is void, illegal, and against public policy. Such agreements are not enforceable by law, and any attempt to enforce them is punishable. It is important to note that the law does not recognize agreements that are harmful to society or against the public interest.