Words like 'See back for Conditions', 'Please Turn Over', 'Subject to terms and conditions contained in Annexure. Are sufficient for reasonable notice of special conditions to the acceptor. Kindly Explain?

Question

Answer

Explanation of Sufficient Notice of Special Conditions to the Acceptor

When it comes to contracts, it's important that all parties involved are aware of any special conditions that may apply. This is where the concept of 'reasonable notice' comes in. Essentially, the person or entity offering the contract must provide sufficient notice of any special conditions in order for the other party to be bound by them. Here are some examples of how this might be done:

See Back for Conditions

If the terms and conditions of a contract are listed on the back of the document, a statement like 'See back for conditions' is often used to alert the reader to this fact. As long as the terms and conditions are clearly written and accessible, this is usually considered sufficient notice.

Please Turn Over

In some cases, a contract may have terms and conditions listed on both sides of the document. If this is the case, a statement like 'Please Turn Over' may be used to prompt the reader to review both sides of the contract. Again, as long as the terms and conditions are clearly written and accessible, this is usually considered sufficient notice.

Subject to Terms and Conditions Contained in Annexure

In situations where a contract has additional terms and conditions that are contained in a separate document (such as an annexure), a statement like 'Subject to terms and conditions contained in Annexure' may be used to alert the reader to this fact. As long as the annexure is clearly identified and accessible, this is usually considered sufficient notice.

Overall

Ultimately, the key to providing sufficient notice of special conditions is to ensure that the terms and conditions are clearly written and accessible. If the other party has a reasonable opportunity to review and understand the terms of the contract, they are considered to have been given sufficient notice.

Similar CA Foundation Doubts

Which one of the following element is not necessary for a contract?

A milk vendor supplied X with milk, which contained typhoid germs. X got infected after consuming the milk. Is the milk vendor bound to pay damages?

On the acceptance of an offer by a offeree,

Which one of the following element is not necessary for a contract?

A milk vendor supplied X with milk, which contained typhoid germs. X got infected after consuming the milk. Is the milk vendor bound to pay damages?

Top Courses for CA FoundationView all

Quantitative Aptitude for CA Foundation

Accounting for CA Foundation

Business Laws for CA Foundation

Business Economics for CA Foundation

Mock Tests & Past Year Papers for CA Foundation

Top Courses for CA Foundation

Top Courses for CA Foundation

Related Content

CA Foundation Courses

Other Courses

How To Prepare?

Other Exams

Company