Question Description
Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion to all persons in India. It provides that all persons in India, subject to public order, morality, health, and other provisions: Are equally entitled to freedom of conscience, and have the right to freely profess, practice and propagate religion. It further provides that this article shall not affect any existing law and shall not prevent the state from making any law relating to: Regulation or restriction of any economic, financial, political, or any secular activity associated with religious practice, providing social welfare and reform, opening of Hindu religious institutions of public character for all the classes and sections of the Hindus. In Hasan Ali v. Mansoor Ali, the Bombay High Court held that Articles 25 and Article 26 not only prevents doctrines or beliefs of religion but also the acts done in pursuance of religion. It thus guarantees ceremonies, modes of worship, rituals, observances, etc. which are an integral part of religion. What is the essential or integral part of a religion has to be determined in the light of the doctrines and practices that are regarded by the community as a part of their religion and also must be included in them. The Supreme Court in In re Noise pollution case, has given certain directions to be followed to control noise pollution in the name of religion: Firecrackers: A complete ban on sound-emitting firecrackers from 10 pm to 6 am. Loudspeakers: Restriction on the beating of drums, tom-tom, blowing of trumpets, or any use of any sound amplifier between 10 pm to 6 am except in public emergencies. Generally: A provision shall be made by the State to confiscate and seize loudspeakers and such other sound amplifiers or equipment that create noise beyond the limit prescribed.Article 26 (subject to public order, morality, and health) confers a right on every religious denomination or any section of such religious denomination of: Establishing and maintaining institutions for religious and charitable purposes, managing its affair with regard to religion, owing and acquiring property (movable and immovable) and administering the property in accordance with the law.Gaurav wanted to start a charitable institute to pay all the priests performing prayers in the temples of his community. Does this go against the right to equality?a)Yes, it does not treat priests equally.b)No, gaurav can form an institute under article 26.c)Would depend if it is state funded.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.