Question Description
Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Kidnapping- In the case of State of Haryana v Raja Ram, the accused induced the prosecutrix who was 14 years of age away from her lawful guardianship. The Supreme Court held that the persuasion by the accused created a will on the part of minor which kept her away from her lawful guardianship for any amount of time and therefore it amounted to ‘kidnapping’. Section 361 of the Code provides that when a person entices a minor (16 years for male and 18 years for female) or a person of unsound mind, person so enticing will be held liable for kidnapping such minor or person from lawful guardianship. Lawful guardianship shall include any person who has been authorized by law to take care and has of the person who has yet not attained the age of majority. As the person being kidnapped is a minor the consent of the minor does not have any relevance in the given case. This crime requires the actus reus.Abduction - In the case of Bahadur Ali v King Emperor, the accused misrepresented himself as a police constable and kept a girl in his house for a ransom of Rs 600. The court held that his act amounted to abduction. Any person either by force has compelled or induced any other person to go from any place, shall be booked with abduction. The means used in case of abduction may be force, compulsion or deceitful means. Consent by the person being abducted condones the accused from the offence so charged against him/her.The consent should be given prior to the procedure of the abduction and not while he/she is being abducted. The offence requires the mens rea and the actus reus.Q. Rahul, 42 years old, was walking back home from his bus stop. On the way a van stopped near him and someone pushed him into that van. He saw his friend sitting in the van and realised that it was a prank so he did not shout and sat there comfortably. Later the van dropped him home. Does it amount to abduction or kidnapping?a)It amounts to kidnapping.b)It amounts to abduction.c)It does not amount to abduction as Rahul gave his consent when he saw it was his friend.d)It does not amount to abduction as it was a friendly prank.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.