CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Principle: A contract which is duly supporte... Start Learning for Free
Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.
Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.
Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?
  • a)
    There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .
  • b)
    There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.
  • c)
    There is contract between the parties
  • d)
    None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful cons...
The essential condition of valid consideration is that it must be ‘something’ to which the law attaches a value. The consideration when given by adults without any influence or coercion need not be adequate to the promise for the validity of an agreement.
Hence, option C is correct.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Top Courses for CLAT

Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: A contract which is duly supported by real and lawful consideration is valid notwithstanding the fact that the consideration is inadequate. The quantum of consideration is for the parties to decide at the time of making a contract, and not for the courts (to decide) when the contract is sought to be enforced.Facts: `Rohit’ agrees to sell his house worth Rs. 25,00000/- for Rs. 100000/- to ‘Narjeet’. A’s consent being an adult was taken without threat or force.Q. Which of the following derivations is CORRECT?a)There is a voidable contract between `Rohit ’ and `Narjeet’ .b)There is no valid contract between `Rohit’ and `Narjeet’.c)There is contract between the partiesd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev