All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Five sentences are given below labelled as 1,... Start Learning for Free
Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out.
  1. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter.
  2. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers.
  3. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation.
  4. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teacher's art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least.
  5. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.
    Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer?
    Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
    Most Upvoted Answer
    Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these,...
    All the five sentences talk about the relation between psychology and teaching. But the structure of sentence 4 indicates that the topic of "ingenuity" and "tact" has already been discussed in the preceding lines. Since, there is no mention of "ingenuity" and "tact" in any other sentences, sentence 4 cannot be a continuation of any of the sentences given. The other 4 sentences can be arranged in the sequence 3-1-5-2.
    Free Test
    FREE
    Start Free Test
    		Start Free Test
    Community Answer
    Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these,...
    Explanation:

    The paragraph talks about the relationship between psychology and the art of teaching. It emphasizes that while psychology may be helpful in understanding the human mind, it is not the sole determinant of being a good teacher. Three of the sentences (1, 2, and 5) are coherent and discuss this relationship, while sentence 4 is unrelated to the main idea and is therefore the odd one out.

    Coherent Paragraph:

    Sentence 1: Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter.

    Sentence 2: To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers.

    Sentence 5: The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.

    The above three sentences discuss how psychology and pedagogics (the art of teaching) are related but separate disciplines. Even if someone is knowledgeable in psychology, it does not automatically make them a good teacher. Psychology and pedagogics are congruent but not subordinate to each other.

    Odd Sentence:

    Sentence 4: That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least.

    This sentence deviates from the main idea of the paragraph. It talks about the importance of ingenuity and tact in teaching, but states that psychology is of no help in developing these qualities. This contradicts the overall message that psychology and pedagogics are related and can coexist in teaching.

    Therefore, sentence 4 is the odd one out.
    Explore Courses for CAT exam

    Similar CAT Doubts

    Analyse the passage below and answer the question that follow:Some psychologists and sociologists believe that psychopathy can be an asset in business and politics and that as a result, psychopathic traits are overrepresented among successful people. This would be a puzzle if it were so. If our moral feelings evolved through natural selection, then it shouldn't be the case that one would flourish without them. And, in fact, the successful psychopath is probably the exception. Psychopaths have certain deficits. Some of these are subtle. The psychologist Abigail Marsh and her colleagues find that psychopaths are markedly insensitive to the expression of fear. Normal people recognize fear and treat it as a distress cue, but psychopaths have problems seeing it, let alone-responding to it appropriately. Other deficits run deeper. The overall lack of moral sentiments––and specifically, the lack of regard for others––might turn out to be the psychopath's downfall. We non-psychopaths are constantly assessing one another, looking for kindness and shame and the like, using this information to decide whom to trust, whom to affiliate with. The psychopath has to pretend to be one of us. But this is difficult. It's hard to force yourself to comply with moral rules just through a rational appreciation of what you are expected to do. If you feel like strangling the cat, it's a struggle to hold back just because you know that it is frowned upon. Without a normal allotment of shame and guilt, psychopaths succumb to bad impulses, doing terrible things out of malice, greed, and simple boredom. And sooner or later, they get caught. While psychopaths can be successful in the short term, they tend to fail in the long term and often end up in prison or worse. Let's take a closer look at what separates psychopaths from the rest of us. There are many symptoms of psychopathy, including pathological, logical lying and lack of remorse or guilt, but the core deficit is indifference toward the suffering of other people.Psychopaths lack compassion. To understand how compassion works for all of us non-psychopaths, it's important to distinguish it from empathy. Now, some contemporary researchers use the terms interchangeably, but there is a big difference between caring about a person (compassion) and putting yourself in the person's shoes (empathy).I am too much of an adaptationist to think that a capacity as rich as empathy exists as a freak biological accident. It most likely has a function, and the most plausible candidate here is that it motivates us to care about others. Empathy exists to motivate compassion and altruism. Still, the link between empathy (in the sense of mirroring another's feelings) and compassion (in the sense of feeling and acting kindly toward another) is more nuanced than many people believe. First, although empathy can be automatic and unconscious––a crying person can affect your mood, even if you're not aware that this is happening and would rather it didn't––we often choose whether to empathize with another person. So when empathy is present, it may be the product of a moral choice, not the cause of it. Empathy is also influenced by what one thinks of the other person. Second, empathy is not needed to motivate compassion. As the psychologist Steven Pinker points out, "If a child has been frightened by a barking dog and is howling in terror, my sympathetic response is not to howl in terror with her, but to comfort and protect her."Third, just as you can have compassion without empathy, you can have empathy without compassion. You might feel the person's pain and wish to stop feeling it––but choose to solve the problem by distancing yourself from that person instead of alleviating his or her suffering. Even otherwise good people sometimes turn away when faced with depictions of pain and suffering in faraway lands, or when passing a homeless person on a city street.Q. A student approached a faculty pleading to increase his marks because failure in one more subject will result in the student having to leave the program.The faculty said, "I am sorry. But I cannot change your grades as it would be unfair to others". In the given circumstance, which of the following best describes the faculty?

    Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Some psychologists and sociologist believe that psychopathy can be an asset in business and politics and that, as a result psychopathic traits are overrepresented among successful people. This would be a puzzle if n were so. If our moral feelings evolved through natural selection, then it shouldnt be the case dial one would flourish without them. And, in fact, the successful psychopath is probably the exception. Psychopaths have certain deficits. Some of these are subtle. The psychologist Abigail Marsh and her colleagues find that psychopaths are markedly insensitive to the expression of fear. Normal people recognize fear and treat it as a distress cue, but psychopaths have problems seeing it, let alone responding to it appropriately.Other deficits run deeper. The overall lack of moral sentiments—and specifically, the lack of regard for others—might turn out to be the psychopaths downfall. We non-psychopaths are constantly assessing one another, looking for kindness and shame and the like, using this information to decide whom to trust, whom to affiliate with. The psychopath has to pretend to be one of us. But this is difficult. Its hard to force yourself to comply with moral rules just through a rational appreciation of what you are expected to do. [f you feel like strangling the cat, its a struggle to hold back just because you know that it is frowned upon.Without a normal allotment of shame and guilt, psychopaths succumb to bad impulses, doing terrible things out of malice, greed, and simple boredom. And sooner or later, they get caught. While psychopaths can be successful in the short term, they tend to fail in the long term and often end up in prison or worse. Lets take a closer look at what separates psychopaths from the rest of us. There are many symptoms of psychopathy, including pathological lying and lack of remorse or guilt, but the core deficit is indifference toward the suffering of other people. Psychopaths lack compassion. To understand how compassion works for all of us non-psychopaths, its important to distinguish it from empathy. Now, some contemporary researchers use the terms interchangeably, but there is a big difference between caring about a person (compassion) and putting yourself m the persons shoes (empathy).I am too much of an adaptationist to think that a capacity as rich as empathy exists as a freak biological accident. It most likely has a function, and the most plausible candidate here is that it motivates us to care about others. Empathy exists to motivate compassion and altruism.Still, the link between empathy (in the sense of mirroring anothers feelings) and compassion (in the sense of feeling and acting kindly toward another) is more nuanced than many people believe. First, although empathy can he automatic and unconscious—a crying person can affect your mood, even if youre not aware that This is happening and would rather it didnt—we often choose whether to empathize with another person. So when empathy is present, it may be the product of a moral choice, not the cause of it. Empathy is also influenced by what one thinks of the other person. Second, empathy is not needed to motivate compassion. As the psychologist Steven Pinker points out, "If a child has been frightened by a barking dog and is howling in terror, my sympathetic response is not to howl in terror with her, but to comfort and protect her." Third, just as you can have compassion without empathy, you can have empathy without compassion. You might feel the persons pain and wish to slop feeling it—but choose to solve the problem by distancing yourself from that person instead of alleviating his or her suffering. Even otherwise good people sometimes turn away when faced with depictions of pain and suffering in faraway lands, or when passing a homeless person on a city street.A student approached a faculty pleading to increase his marks because failure in one more subject will result in the student having to leave the program. The faculty said, "I am sorry. But I cannot change your grades as it would be unfair to others" In the given circumstance,Q. which of the following best describes the faculty?

    Analyse the passage below and answer the question that follow:Some psychologists and sociologists believe that psychopathy can be an asset in business and politics and that as a result, psychopathic traits are overrepresented among successful people. This would be a puzzle if it were so. If our moral feelings evolved through natural selection, then it shouldn't be the case that one would flourish without them. And, in fact, the successful psychopath is probably the exception. Psychopaths have certain deficits. Some of these are subtle. The psychologist Abigail Marsh and her colleagues find that psychopaths are markedly insensitive to the expression of fear. Normal people recognize fear and treat it as a distress cue, but psychopaths have problems seeing it, let alone-responding to it appropriately. Other deficits run deeper. The overall lack of moral sentiments––and specifically, the lack of regard for others––might turn out to be the psychopath's downfall. We non-psychopaths are constantly assessing one another, looking for kindness and shame and the like, using this information to decide whom to trust, whom to affiliate with. The psychopath has to pretend to be one of us. But this is difficult. It's hard to force yourself to comply with moral rules just through a rational appreciation of what you are expected to do. If you feel like strangling the cat, it's a struggle to hold back just because you know that it is frowned upon. Without a normal allotment of shame and guilt, psychopaths succumb to bad impulses, doing terrible things out of malice, greed, and simple boredom. And sooner or later, they get caught. While psychopaths can be successful in the short term, they tend to fail in the long term and often end up in prison or worse. Let's take a closer look at what separates psychopaths from the rest of us. There are many symptoms of psychopathy, including pathological, logical lying and lack of remorse or guilt, but the core deficit is indifference toward the suffering of other people.Psychopaths lack compassion. To understand how compassion works for all of us non-psychopaths, it's important to distinguish it from empathy. Now, some contemporary researchers use the terms interchangeably, but there is a big difference between caring about a person (compassion) and putting yourself in the person's shoes (empathy).I am too much of an adaptationist to think that a capacity as rich as empathy exists as a freak biological accident. It most likely has a function, and the most plausible candidate here is that it motivates us to care about others. Empathy exists to motivate compassion and altruism. Still, the link between empathy (in the sense of mirroring another's feelings) and compassion (in the sense of feeling and acting kindly toward another) is more nuanced than many people believe. First, although empathy can be automatic and unconscious––a crying person can affect your mood, even if you're not aware that this is happening and would rather it didn't––we often choose whether to empathize with another person. So when empathy is present, it may be the product of a moral choice, not the cause of it. Empathy is also influenced by what one thinks of the other person. Second, empathy is not needed to motivate compassion. As the psychologist Steven Pinker points out, "If a child has been frightened by a barking dog and is howling in terror, my sympathetic response is not to howl in terror with her, but to comfort and protect her."Third, just as you can have compassion without empathy, you can have empathy without compassion. You might feel the person's pain and wish to stop feeling it––but choose to solve the problem by distancing yourself from that person instead of alleviating his or her suffering. Even otherwise good people sometimes turn away when faced with depictions of pain and suffering in faraway lands, or when passing a homeless person on a city street.Q. The core deficit of psychopaths affects their long term success because,

    Five sentences are given below. Four of which when arranged in a proper order, form a logical and meaningful paragraph. Identify the sentence that does not belong to the paragraph and enter its number as your answer. With the modern tendency toward specialization, the natural outgrowth of necessity, there is no inherent reason why the bones of a building should not be devised by one man and its fleshly clothing by another, so long as they understand one another, and are in ideal agreement, but there is in general all too little understanding, and a confusion of ideas and aims. Preoccupied as he is with the buildings strength, safety, economy; solving new and staggeringly difficult problems with address and daring, he has scant sympathy with such inconsequent matters as the stylistic purity of a façade, or the profile of a moulding. To the designer, on the other hand, the engineer appears in the light of a subordinate to be used for the promotion of his own ends, or an evil to be endured as an interference with those ends. In the field of domestic architecture these dramatic contrasts are less evident, less sharply marked. To the average structural engineer the architectural designer is a mere milliner in stone, informed in those prevailing architectural fashions of which he himself knows little and cares less. Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer?

    Directions: In the following question, five statements are provided. These statements form a coherent paragraph when properly arranged. Select the alternative representing the proper and logical sequencing of these statements in the question.1. But, equally, the benefits of reservation have not been distributed equitably.2. There are inequalities and then there are inequalities within unequal entities.3. The relatively rich and dominant sections among the backward castes have tended to take up a disproportionately larger share of the reservation pie.4. Moreover, large segments of the weaker sections and backward classes continue to have no access to quality education or meaningful employment.5. That reservation in jobs and education did address socio-economic disparities in India to some degree is true.

    Top Courses for CATView all

    Top Courses for CAT

    Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer?
    Question Description
    Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer?.
    Solutions for Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
    Here you can find the meaning of Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Five sentences are given below labelled as 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Of these, four sentences, when arranged properly, make a meaningful and coherent paragraph. Identify the odd one out. Even where the advancer of the art was also a psychologist, the pedagogics and the psychology ran side by side, and the former was not derived in any sense from the latter. To know psychology, therefore, is absolutely no guarantee that we shall be good teachers. The art of teaching grew up in the schoolroom, out of inventiveness and sympathetic concrete observation. That ingenuity in meeting and pursuing the pupil, that tact for the concrete situation, though they are the alpha and omega of the teachers art, are things to which psychology cannot help us in the least. The two were congruent, but neither was subordinate.Correct answer is '4'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
    Explore Courses for CAT exam

    Top Courses for CAT

    Explore Courses
    SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
    Signup for Free!
    Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
    10M+ students study on EduRev
    Get App
    © EduRev
    Education Revolution
    Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
    Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
    Takes less than 10 seconds to signup