All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >  Arrange the countries from highest HDI to low... Start Learning for Free
Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.
(i) Norway
(ii) Ireland
(iii) Switzerland
(iv) Hong kong
  • a)
    i, ii, iii, iv
  • b)
    ii, iii, i, iv
  • c)
    iv, i, ii, iii
  • d)
    iii, iv, ii, i
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Class 12 doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ir...
Highest HDI to Lowest HDI:

(i) Norway
(ii) Ireland
(iii) Switzerland
(iv) Hong Kong

Explanation:

HDI, or Human Development Index, is a measure of a country's overall development and well-being, taking into account factors such as life expectancy, education, and income. A higher HDI indicates a higher level of human development.

(i) Norway:
Norway consistently ranks at the top of the HDI rankings due to its high standard of living, excellent healthcare system, and quality education. The country has a strong economy, low unemployment rate, and a high life expectancy. Norway's commitment to social welfare and sustainable development has contributed to its high HDI score.

(ii) Ireland:
Ireland also ranks high on the HDI scale, primarily due to its high standard of living and well-developed education system. The country has experienced significant economic growth over the past few decades, attracting multinational companies and creating job opportunities. Ireland's investment in education and healthcare has improved the overall well-being of its population.

(iii) Switzerland:
Switzerland is known for its high quality of life, strong economy, and well-functioning healthcare system. The country has a high HDI score due to its high life expectancy, high standard of education, and high average income. Switzerland's political stability and commitment to innovation have contributed to its overall development.

(iv) Hong Kong:
Although Hong Kong is not a country, it is included in the HDI rankings as a Special Administrative Region of China. It has a relatively high HDI score, primarily due to its high life expectancy and high average income. Hong Kong has a developed economy and offers a high standard of living. However, it is worth noting that the HDI for Hong Kong may not accurately reflect the overall well-being and development of its population, as it is a small region with unique political and economic circumstances.

In summary, Norway has the highest HDI among the given countries, followed by Ireland, Switzerland, and Hong Kong. These countries demonstrate a high level of overall development and well-being, with a focus on factors such as education, healthcare, and income.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ir...
A well-functioning and relatively uncorrupted state. A high level of economic development, good medical facilities have helped Norway to have the highest HDI. 
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. Why has the author held countries responsible for the failure of COP25?

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. With reference to the passage, what is the meaning of the term signatories?

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. Which of the following did not hail the 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as a failure?

Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2025 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Arrange the countries from highest HDI to lowest HDI.(i) Norway(ii) Ireland(iii) Switzerland(iv) Hong konga)i, ii, iii, ivb)ii, iii, i, ivc)iv, i, ii, iiid)iii, iv, ii, iCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup