By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > By means of a military intervention, the Uni...

Join the Discussion on the App

By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.

Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?

a)
Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.
b)
Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.
c)
Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.
d)
Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.
e)
Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

MAH-CET MBA Mock Test- 2

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afg...

Options 2 and 5 are eliminated the author is unlikely to agree with them; they undermine the indirect claim made in the passage, that intervention can bring democracy in a country. Option 3 is eliminated as the author is not as likely to agree with it as it does not talk about the importance of foreign intervention in bringing democracy. Option 4 is eliminated as although the author is likely to agree with it, it speaks of already present democratic movements, while the example stated in the passage is not mentioned to have had one. Option 1 is the right answer, as this statement reinforces the claim being proved in the passage.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

DIRECTIONS for questions: The passage given below is accompanied by a set of three questions. Choose the best answer to each question.The issues and preoccupations of the 21st century present new and often fundamentally different types of challenges from those that faced the world in 1945, when the United Nations was founded. As new realities and challenges have emerged, so too have new expectations for action and new standards of conduct in national and international affairs. Since, for example, the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, it has become evident that the war against terrorism the world must now fight – one with no contested frontiers and a largely invisible enemy – is one like no other war before it.Many new international institutions have been created to meet these changed circumstances. In key respects, however, the mandates and capacity of international institutions have not kept pace with international needs or modern expectations. Above all, the issue of international intervention for human protection purposes is a clear and compelling example of concerted action urgently being needed to bring international norms and institutions in line with international needs and expectations.The current debate on intervention for human protection purposes is itself both a product and a reflection of how much has changed since the UN was established. The current debate takes place in the context of a broadly expanded range of state, non-state, and institutional actors, and increasingly evident interaction and interdependence among them. It is a debate that reflects new sets of issues and new types of concerns. It is a debate that is being conducted within the framework of new standards of conduct for states and individuals, and in a context of greatly increased expectations for action. And it is a debate that takes place within an institutional framework that since the end of the Cold War has held out the prospect of effective joint international action to address issues of peace, security, human rights and sustainable development on a global scale.With new actors – not least new states, with the UN growing from 51 member states in 1945 to 189 today – has come a wide range of new voices, perspectives, interests, experiences and aspirations. Together, these new international actors have added both depth and texture to the increasingly rich tapestry of international society and important institutional credibility and practical expertise to the wider debate.Prominent among the range of important new actors are a number of institutional actors and mechanisms, especially in the areas of human rights and human security. They have included, among others, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, both created in 1993, and its sister tribunals for Rwanda established in 1994 and Sierra Leone in 2001.The International Criminal Court, whose creation was decided in 1998, will begin operation when 60 countries have ratified its Statute. In addition to the new institutions, established ones such as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and the ICRC and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have been ever more active.Nearly as significant has been the emergence of many new non-state actors in international affairs – including especially a large number of NGOs dealing with global matters; a growing number of media and academic institutions with worldwide reach; and an increasingly diverse array of armed non-state actors ranging from national and international terrorists to traditional rebel movements and various organized criminal groupings. These new non-state actors, good or bad, have forced the debate about intervention for human protection purposes to be conducted in front of a broader public, while at the same time adding new elements to the agenda.Q. A criticism that the author levies against international institutions is that

View answer

DIRECTIONS for questions: The passage given below is accompanied by a set of three questions. Choose the best answer to each question.The issues and preoccupations of the 21st century present new and often fundamentally different types of challenges from those that faced the world in 1945, when the United Nations was founded. As new realities and challenges have emerged, so too have new expectations for action and new standards of conduct in national and international affairs. Since, for example, the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, it has become evident that the war against terrorism the world must now fight – one with no contested frontiers and a largely invisible enemy – is one like no other war before it.Many new international institutions have been created to meet these changed circumstances. In key respects, however, the mandates and capacity of international institutions have not kept pace with international needs or modern expectations. Above all, the issue of international intervention for human protection purposes is a clear and compelling example of concerted action urgently being needed to bring international norms and institutions in line with international needs and expectations.The current debate on intervention for human protection purposes is itself both a product and a reflection of how much has changed since the UN was established. The current debate takes place in the context of a broadly expanded range of state, non-state, and institutional actors, and increasingly evident interaction and interdependence among them. It is a debate that reflects new sets of issues and new types of concerns. It is a debate that is being conducted within the framework of new standards of conduct for states and individuals, and in a context of greatly increased expectations for action. And it is a debate that takes place within an institutional framework that since the end of the Cold War has held out the prospect of effective joint international action to address issues of peace, security, human rights and sustainable development on a global scale.With new actors – not least new states, with the UN growing from 51 member states in 1945 to 189 today – has come a wide range of new voices, perspectives, interests, experiences and aspirations. Together, these new international actors have added both depth and texture to the increasingly rich tapestry of international society and important institutional credibility and practical expertise to the wider debate.Prominent among the range of important new actors are a number of institutional actors and mechanisms, especially in the areas of human rights and human security. They have included, among others, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, both created in 1993, and its sister tribunals for Rwanda established in 1994 and Sierra Leone in 2001.The International Criminal Court, whose creation was decided in 1998, will begin operation when 60 countries have ratified its Statute. In addition to the new institutions, established ones such as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and the ICRC and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have been ever more active.Nearly as significant has been the emergence of many new non-state actors in international affairs – including especially a large number of NGOs dealing with global matters; a growing number of media and academic institutions with worldwide reach; and an increasingly diverse array of armed non-state actors ranging from national and international terrorists to traditional rebel movements and various organized criminal groupings. These new non-state actors, good or bad, have forced the debate about intervention for human protection purposes to be conducted in front of a broader public, while at the same time adding new elements to the agenda.Q. Which of the following is true regarding the debate on intervention for human protection purposes?

View answer

DIRECTIONS for questions: The passage given below is accompanied by a set of three questions. Choose the best answer to each question.The issues and preoccupations of the 21st century present new and often fundamentally different types of challenges from those that faced the world in 1945, when the United Nations was founded. As new realities and challenges have emerged, so too have new expectations for action and new standards of conduct in national and international affairs. Since, for example, the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, it has become evident that the war against terrorism the world must now fight – one with no contested frontiers and a largely invisible enemy – is one like no other war before it.Many new international institutions have been created to meet these changed circumstances. In key respects, however, the mandates and capacity of international institutions have not kept pace with international needs or modern expectations. Above all, the issue of international intervention for human protection purposes is a clear and compelling example of concerted action urgently being needed to bring international norms and institutions in line with international needs and expectations.The current debate on intervention for human protection purposes is itself both a product and a reflection of how much has changed since the UN was established. The current debate takes place in the context of a broadly expanded range of state, non-state, and institutional actors, and increasingly evident interaction and interdependence among them. It is a debate that reflects new sets of issues and new types of concerns. It is a debate that is being conducted within the framework of new standards of conduct for states and individuals, and in a context of greatly increased expectations for action. And it is a debate that takes place within an institutional framework that since the end of the Cold War has held out the prospect of effective joint international action to address issues of peace, security, human rights and sustainable development on a global scale.With new actors – not least new states, with the UN growing from 51 member states in 1945 to 189 today – has come a wide range of new voices, perspectives, interests, experiences and aspirations. Together, these new international actors have added both depth and texture to the increasingly rich tapestry of international society and important institutional credibility and practical expertise to the wider debate.Prominent among the range of important new actors are a number of institutional actors and mechanisms, especially in the areas of human rights and human security. They have included, among others, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, both created in 1993, and its sister tribunals for Rwanda established in 1994 and Sierra Leone in 2001.The International Criminal Court, whose creation was decided in 1998, will begin operation when 60 countries have ratified its Statute. In addition to the new institutions, established ones such as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, and the ICRC and International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, have been ever more active.Nearly as significant has been the emergence of many new non-state actors in international affairs – including especially a large number of NGOs dealing with global matters; a growing number of media and academic institutions with worldwide reach; and an increasingly diverse array of armed non-state actors ranging from national and international terrorists to traditional rebel movements and various organized criminal groupings. These new non-state actors, good or bad, have forced the debate about intervention for human protection purposes to be conducted in front of a broader public, while at the same time adding new elements to the agenda.Q. The author presents the example of the terrorists attacks of September 9, 2011 to

View answer

Direction: The sentences given in the question, when properly sequenced, form a coherent paragraph. Each sentence is labeled with a letter. Choose the most logical order of sentences from the given choices to construct a coherent paragraph.A. Even if the Court is not motivated by an anti-African agenda, it is no less concerning that it acts, without fail, in concert with its North Atlantic backers.B. It simply reproduces a Western narrative of Russian aggression that justifies NATO’s largest build-up of military forces in eastern Europe since the Cold War.C. That military intervention in Africa by former colonial powers has been followed, almost without exception, by the International Criminal Court’s juridical intervention, leaves Africans understandably suspicious.D. And the Court’s recent decision to launch an investigation into South Ossetia—its first extra-African investigation—is but of a piece with its earlier interventions, doing little to assuage that concern.

View answer

InstructionsComprehension:The figure below shows the street map for a certain region with the street intersections marked from a through l. A person standing at an intersection can see along straight lines to other intersections that are in her line of sight and all other people standing at these intersections. For example, a person standing at intersection g can see all people standing at intersections b, c, e, f, h, and k. In particular, the person standing at intersection g can see the person standing at intersection e irrespective of whether there is a person standing at intersection f.Six people U, V, W, X, Y, and Z, are standing at different intersections. No two people are standing at the same intersection.The following additional facts are known.1. X, U, and Z are standing at the three corners of a triangle formed by three street segments.2. X can see only U and Z.3. Y can see only U and W.4. U sees V standing in the next intersection behind Z.5. W cannot see V or Z.6. No one among the six is standing at intersection d.Q.Should a new person stand at intersection d, who among the six would she see?

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series and 500+ Practice Tests 2024

Top Courses for CAT

View all

By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice By means of a military intervention, the United States has helped Afghanistan organize democratic elections and a centralized government, which on their own they likely would have been unable to do.Which of the following statements is the author most likely to agree with?a)Often for democracy to take hold, countries need other logistical and development help.b)Support can be expressed for pro-democratic forces through nonviolent means.c)Some governments are so oppressive, that even though people want democracy they have no power to effectively ask for it.d)Interventions from the international community can be important signals of support to democratic movements.e)Development aid doesn't have to come from intervention.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam