All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: In making decisions about import... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.
Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?
Arguments:
I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.
II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.
  • a)
    Only argument II is strong.
  • b)
    Only argument I is strong.
  • c)
    Either argument I or argument II is strong.
  • d)
    Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
None of the arguments stand to be strong. Only makes the second statement invalid. While the argument I say nobody should be quarantined unless tested positive but since the spread is how severe is not clear and also the test is valid therefore argument I is also not strong.
Therefore, neither of the statements stands strong.
Hence, the correct option is (D).
View all questions of this test
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following is an assumption, on which the argument that all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand are being screened in India, is based?

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the statement that India has escaped the worst of the virus?

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following would be a desirable action in order to prevent rumours about coronavirus in India?

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following roles are played by the first paragraph and the third paragraph in the passge?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.We do not have a precise timeline, but past pandemics offer tantalising clues. The widespread use of dashboards has created the perception that the pandemic will end when all dashboard indicators hit zero (infections, cases and fatalities). However, history suggests this is the most unlikely outcome. In the past 130 years, respiratory pandemics have been followed by annual seasonal waves fuelled by viral endemicity, which generally lasts until the next pandemic. What goes down, comes back up.Multiple factors contribute individually or in combination to determine disease patterns. Some diseases are seasonal, and the waves follow seasonal patterns. In India, during the monsoons, due to crowding, a spike in vector-borne diseases (dengue and malari

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup