Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In making decisions about import...

Join the Discussion on the App

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.

Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?

Arguments:

I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.

II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.

a)
Only argument II is strong.
b)
Only argument I is strong.
c)
Either argument I or argument II is strong.
d)
Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

AILET Mock Test-3 (New Pattern)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...

None of the arguments stand to be strong. Only makes the second statement invalid. While the argument I say nobody should be quarantined unless tested positive but since the spread is how severe is not clear and also the test is valid therefore argument I is also not strong.

Therefore, neither of the statements stands strong.

Hence, the correct option is (D).

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A food poisoning outbreak tied to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders was caused by a common type of E. coli bacteria that can cause serious illness and death.Particularly vulnerable are young children, older people or those with weakened immune systems.About 50 people have fallen ill in the McDonald’s outbreak, and one has died, with ages ranging from 13 to 88, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.A preliminary investigation suggests raw slivered onions served on Quarter Pounders are a likely source of the outbreak.Here’s what to know about the dangerous germ.What is E. coli?E. coli is a type of bacteria found in the environment, including water, food and in the intestines of people and animals. There are many kinds of harmless E. coli, but a few types can make people seriously ill. The McDonald’s outbreak is caused by E. coli O157:H7, which produces a toxin that causes dangerous diarrhea and can lead to kidney failure and other serious problems, according to the CDC.How is it spread?People can get sick from E. coli poisoning when they consume contaminated foods or through contact with animals, the environment or other people who are infected. Health officials initially focused on fresh slivered onions and beef patties as the possible sources of the McDonald’s outbreak. But the beef patties are an unlikely source because of federal requirements for testing meat and McDonald’s protocols that call for cooking it to a temperature that kills the bacteria. The onions are served raw.What are the symptoms of E. coli poisoning?Symptoms occur quickly, within a day or two of eating contaminated food, and typically include fever, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea and signs of dehydration — little or no peeing, increased thirst and dizziness. The infection can cause a type of serious kidney injury, especially in kids younger than 5. E. coli poisoning in young children requires immediate medical attention.How often does E. coli make people sick?The type of bacteria implicated in this outbreak causes about 74,000 infections in the U.S. annually, leading to more than 2,000 hospitalizations and 61 deaths each year, according to the CDC. In general, E. coli infections were lower in 2023 than in recent years and cases of severe kidney injury caused by the bacteria remained stable, according to latest federal data.What other germs can cause food poisoning?Food poisoning sickens at least 48 million people in the U.S. each year, including 128,000 who are hospitalized and 3,000 who die. E. coli poisoning is only one cause of such infections. Other germs can make people sick, too. The most common is norovirus, a group of bacteria that cause between 19 million and 21 million cases of food poisoning in the U.S. each year, according to the CDC. Salmonella bacteria in food sickens about 1.3 million people. Listeria bacteria cause fewer illnesses, about 1,600 each year, but are responsible for about 260 deaths.[Excerpt from pbs.org "E. Coli Outbreak: Causes, Symptoms, and Prevention" Dated 26/10/24]Which of the following is NOT a type of E. coli infection mentioned in the text?

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following is an assumption, on which the argument that all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand are being screened in India, is based?

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following, if true, would undermine the statement that India has escaped the worst of the virus?

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following would be a desirable action in order to prevent rumours about coronavirus in India?

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question.As the novel coronavirus toll overtook the 774 deaths worldwide from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in 2002-2003, which had been the biggest coronavirus outbreak to date, the World Health Organization (WHO) said the outbreak was stabilising, but warned that it was still too early to predict if the virus had peaked.India is screening all passengers coming from China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand at 21 airports and major sea and land ports. With Kerala quickly identifying and containing coronavirus importation cases among three students from Wuhan and everyone they had come in contact with since they got infected, India has, so far, escaped the worst of the virus. The WHO estimates that the incubation period of the virus — the time a person takes between getting infected and showing symptoms — is about two to 10 days, so everyone with symptoms will be retested on day 14 of the quarantine period to ensure that they are disease-free.The big challenge for India is to maintain the urgency to stop the infection, and ensure patients and medical staff follow quarantine protocols and reject the rumors and magic remedies being widely shared on social media. For if that happens, Indias high population density will lead to the infection spreading like wildfire. Trust in science and medicine is the only way to end the outbreak once and for all.Q.Which of the following roles are played by the first paragraph and the third paragraph in the passge?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all those who have come in contact with the patients' infectious respiratory disease be quarantined in their houses?Arguments:I. No, nobody should be quarantined unless they are tested and found to be infected by the virus causing the disease.II. Yes, this is the only way to control the spread of the dreaded disease.a)Only argument II is strong.b)Only argument I is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Neither argument I nor argument II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam