Explanation:

1. Understanding the situation:
In this scenario, there is a conflict between your liking for pets and your mother's dislike for pets. It is important to understand the perspectives of both parties involved.

2. Your liking for pets:
You have mentioned that you like pets. This implies that you enjoy the company of animals, find them comforting or entertaining, and possibly even have a desire to own a pet. Your preference for pets indicates that you value their presence and the positive experiences they bring to your life.

3. Your mother's dislike for pets:
On the other hand, your mother does not like pets. This suggests that she may have various reasons for her dislike, such as allergies, fear, or simply not enjoying the responsibility that comes with owning a pet. It is important to respect her perspective, even if it differs from your own.

4. Evaluating the trial:
The trial, in this case, can be evaluated based on the balance or imbalance between your liking for pets and your mother's dislike for pets.

- Balanced: If both parties find a compromise or middle ground where both their preferences can be met to some extent, the trial can be considered balanced. This could involve finding alternative ways to interact with pets, such as volunteering at an animal shelter or spending time with friends who have pets.

- Imbalanced: If one party's preference significantly outweighs the other's, the trial can be considered imbalanced. In this case, your liking for pets is not aligned with your mother's dislike, resulting in an imbalance. It may cause tension or conflicts between you and your mother.

5. Correct answer:
Based on the given information, the correct answer is option 'B' - Imbalanced. Your liking for pets conflicts with your mother's dislike for pets, resulting in an imbalanced trial. It is important to find a respectful way to navigate this situation and consider alternative ways to fulfill your desire for pet companionship without disregarding your mother's feelings.