All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >  Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars... Start Learning for Free
Choose the correct option:
Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts of
  • a)
    Kerala
  • b)
    Karnataka
  • c)
    Tamil Nadu
  • d)
    Andhra Pradesh
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Class 12 doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Kera...
Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts of Tamil Nadu.

The Alvars and Nayanars were a group of saintly devotees of Lord Vishnu and Lord Shiva respectively. They lived in Tamil Nadu, India, between the 6th and 9th centuries CE, and are considered to be the pioneers of the Bhakti movement in South India.

Who were Alvars and Nayanars?

- Alvars: The Alvars were a group of 12 Vaishnava saints who composed devotional hymns in Tamil in praise of Lord Vishnu. They believed in the philosophy of Vishishtadvaita, which means qualified non-dualism. The Alvars were born in different parts of Tamil Nadu and were from various castes.
- Nayanars: The Nayanars were a group of 63 Shaiva saints who composed devotional hymns in Tamil in praise of Lord Shiva. They believed in the philosophy of Shaivism, which emphasizes the worship of Lord Shiva as the supreme being. The Nayanars were also born in different parts of Tamil Nadu and were from various castes.

What was the Bhakti movement?

The Bhakti movement was a socio-religious movement that emerged in India around the 7th century CE. It emphasized the worship of a personal God and the importance of devotion and love towards God. The Bhakti movement had a significant impact on Indian society, as it promoted equality, tolerance, and social harmony.

What was the contribution of Alvars and Nayanars to the Bhakti movement?

- The Alvars and Nayanars were the pioneers of the Bhakti movement in South India. They composed devotional hymns in Tamil that were simple, beautiful, and easily understandable by the common people.
- Their hymns emphasized the importance of devotion and love towards God, and they rejected the orthodox rituals and caste system prevalent in Hinduism at that time.
- The Alvars and Nayanars also played a significant role in spreading their teachings and philosophy to the common people through their itinerant preaching.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts of Tamil Nadu. They were the pioneers of the Bhakti movement in South India and played a significant role in promoting devotion and love towards God, as well as social harmony and equality. Their contribution to Indian society and culture is immense, and their teachings continue to inspire millions of people even today.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Kera...
The Nayanars and Alvars were the Tamil poet-saints. They played a crucial role between the 5th-10th Centuries in propagating the Bhakti Movement in Southern India. The Nayanars were a group of 63 saints who lived between the 6th to 8th centuries CE, dedicated to Lord Shiva.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. As used in the passage, the word "sluggish" most nearly means

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. The passage puts forth its points using which of the following?

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. Which of the following reason have been cited in the passage for the better performance of the Southern States?

The NITI Aayogs Sustainable Development Goals Index for 2019, released on Monday, does not reveal any surprising information. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka are joined by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Goa as the best performers while the northern/north-central and northeastern States have been sluggish in achieving the U.N.-mandated goals by 2030. Poor performers such as Uttar Pradesh have shown discernible advances in the indices measured between 2018-19 - especially in adopting cleaner energy and improving sanitation. But the regional divide is stark in basic livelihood goals such as "eradication of poverty", and "good health and well-being" or even in measures such as "industry, innovation and infrastructure".This points to variances in both State governance and in administrative structures and implementation of welfare policies. The South, led by Kerala and Tamil Nadu, has done much more in orienting administrative institutions to deliver on basic welfare, leading to actions on health care, education, poverty eradication and hunger, with a governance structure tuned to competitively monitoring actions on these fronts. The converse is true of northern states Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, where outcomes have remained relatively poor despite there not being much of a difference in the governance structure. The obvious answer to the puzzle could be the presence of historical socio-political movements that have resulted in greater circulation of elites in power and which have addressed issues related to welfare more thoroughly in the South -Kerala and T.N in particular. Yet even these States need to go further in reaching the UNs SDGs and achieving the living standards of both the first world and other developing nations.The western States, especially Gujarat and Maharashtra, are also better off in economic growth and industry, indicating a diversified economy, higher employment ratios, skilled labour and better entrepreneurial culture.A major fault-line in India is in achieving gender equality, where barring middling performers such as Himachal Pradesh, Kerala and Jammu & Kashmir, the rest of the country falls short. Low sex ratio (896 females per 1,000 males), poor labour force participation and presence in managerial positions (only 17.5% and 30%, according to the report), high level of informality of labour, a major gender pay gap (females earn 78% of wages earned by males in regular salaried employment), lack of adequate representation in governance (14.4% in Parliament, but 44.4% in local government) besides high crime rates against women and girls are among the major national level indicators that have contributed to this. States need to climb a mountain to achieve gender equality, but immediate steps such as enhancing womens participation in governance through parliamentary reservations would go a long way in addressing several of the issues faced by them.Q. Which of the following choices best captures the essence of the passage?

Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2025 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Choose the correct option:Alvars and Nayanars were the Bhakts ofa)Keralab)Karnatakac)Tamil Nadud)Andhra PradeshCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup