Question Description
Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Britain's foreign secretary has said that targeting cultural sites in Iran would breach international warfare conventions in an implicit rebuke to Donald Trump for threatening to bomb protected heritage sites. Dominic Raab did not criticise the US president directly over his threats, but said: "We have been very clear that cultural sites are protected under international law and we would expect that to be respected." The senior British minister was speaking after Trump said he could target 52 Iranian sites if Iran retaliated over the assassination of Qassem Suleimani - "some at a very high level and important to Iran and the Iranian culture".Q. In the light of the passage, what can be inferred?a)Britain is a country that fav ours war mongering and hate crimes.b)There is a distinct possibility that Iran will retaliate against the killing of Qassem Suleimani.c)Britain's cultural heritage dates back to thousands of years and so, it doesn't support the American campaign against Iran.d)Britain is an ally of the US in the former's fight against Iran.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.