Question Description
The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The draft Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill of 2019, circulated in March this year, aims at re-establishing state power over forests at the cost of rights granted to the forest dwelling tribals and other forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act of 2006 (FRA). It seeks to empower the very forest bureaucracy whose highhandedness provoked the latest round of Left-wing insurgency originating from Chhattisgarh's Bastar region and undermine the FRA brought to soothe tribals' ire and undo "historic injustices" in denying them theirs traditional rights.Through this the central government seeks to arm itself with far greater power over forest resources than the colonial masters who brought in the Indian Forest Act of 1927 (IFA). This draft Bill seeks to replace the IF(a) The draft bill brings in forest bureaucracy to manage "village forests" through joint forest management committee (JFMC). Though the concept of village forest exists in the original IFA, the FRA overrides all existing laws in recognising and vesting rights over forest land and resources with forest dwelling communities, including in conservation and management of forests through their Gram Sabha, thus making JFMC defunct or redundant.It says that even when a village forest belongs to tribal community, use of timber and other forest produce, pasture rights and protections and management of these forests would be "in consultation with the forest department" (clause 22). Further, it empowers forest bureaucracy to record forest rights and gives it extraordinary power to take away ("commute") individual and community rights for declaring and usurping "reserve forest" by paying compensation. Clause 26 provides that in case of fire in a reserved forest or theft of forest produce or grazing by cattle, all rights of pasture or to forest produce would be suspended. Taken together, these provisions give a veto to forest bureaucracy and tantamount to extinction of forest rights.The draft bill introduces a new provision (clause 66) to allow forest bureaucracy to use fire arms and enter and search any premises on mere suspicion, just by informing Gram Sabha, to check forest offences like unauthorized harm to flora or fauna.Q. Which is the primary reason for the author being disgruntled with the proposed Indian Forest (Amendment) Bill, 2019?a)The autonomy erstwhile with the forest dwellers is being proposed to be shifted to the State. (b) The forest dwellers will lose their livelihood.b)The forest bureaucracy will use its unbridled powers to sell the forest produce illegally thereby earning black money.c)The State ditched the forest dwellers by taking powers of the Gram Sabha and vesting it with the District Judge.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.