Question Description
The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament recently passed an amendment that would change the structure and character of the Constitution. This amendment seeks to tinker with the basic feature of 'secularism' and it has created a sense of insecurity in the minds of minority. Based on the author's arguments and essence of the passage, would such an amendment be constitutionally permissible?a)The amendment would be constitutionally permissible, since the government is not aligned to any religion.b)The amendment would not be constitutionally permissible, since secularism is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.c)The amendment would be constitutionally impermissible, since secularism cannot be effaced from the Indian civilization despite being removed from the constitution.d)The amendment would not be valid, since it is not backed by a cultural principle.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.