GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Although the journal Social Text was never at... Start Learning for Free
Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of women’s oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminist’s classification of the journal as the one run by “boy’s club” could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journal’s mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.
The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in “everyday life,” “mass culture,” and “consumer society”. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in “Unequal Developments,” the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.
 
For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film ‘The North Avenue Irregulars’, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of women’s activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.
The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editors
  • a)
    Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.
  • b)
    Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.
  • c)
    More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.
  • d)
    Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.
  • e)
    Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publish...
Explanation:

Excluded focus on gender, sexuality, and women's experiences
- The founders of Social Text demarcated fields of focus that did not include specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.
- This exclusion ultimately led to a lack of feminist analysis and discussion within the journal.
- The fields of focus chosen were more centered around everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society, which did not inherently address the issues faced by women.
In conclusion, the founders' decision to exclude a focus on gender, sexuality, and women's experiences in the initial prospectus of Social Text hindered the journal's ability to engage with feminist discourse and effectively address the oppression and struggles faced by women in society.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.What does the passage suggest about the kind of articles published by Social Text journal in relation to feminism?

Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.Why does the author cite Christine Holmlands example to?

Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.What does the author imply when he states May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression?

Read the passage and answer the question given below.The study of the analog position of mental representation has many fascinating branches which help illuminate the inner workings of our minds and how we perceive images in our mind‘s eye. This theory points to the link between the time it takes to solve mental problems and their complexity.In a now-famous study, Stephen Kosslyn asked subjects to imagine an animal, such as a rabbit, next to either an elephant or a fly. When the image was formed, Kosslyn would ask whether or not the target animal had a particular attribute. For example, Kosslyn might say, elephant, rabbit, and then leg. He found that it took subjects longer to answer when the target animal was next to the large animal than when it was next to the small animal. Kosslyn interpreted this to mean that subjects had to zoom in on the image to detect the particular feature. Just as one has difficulty seeing details on small objects, so the subjects could not simply mentally see details on the smaller object in their mental image.Second, Kosslyn and colleagues demonstrated that the time it takes to scan between two points depends on the distance between the two points [in a memorized image]. In one experiment, subjects memorized an array of letters separated by different distances. Kosslyn found that the farther apart the letters were from each other, the longer it took to answer questions about one of the letters. One of the principal hypotheses of the analog position of mental representation, which is the idea that mental processing requires one to move sequentially through all intervening steps to solve a problem, is that mental images have regular properties.In a similar experiment, Kosslyn had subjects memorize pictures of objects like a plane or a motorboat. Then he had them focus on one part of the object (e.g., the motor) and move to another (e.g., the anchor). He found that the time it took to determine whether the second part was present depended on the distance between the two parts in the memorized picture.Using a completely different paradigm, Shepard and Feng tested the amount of time that it would take for subjects to specify whether two arrows on unfolded blocks matched up. They found a linear relationship between the number of folds between the arrows and the time it took to make this judgment, suggesting that subjects went through a discrete series of organized steps in order to solve this problem.The final type of experiment showing that mental images have regular properties is perhaps the most famous: mental rotation experiments. In 1971, Shepard and Metzler tested subjects‘ abilities to make complex figure comparisons. They presented subjects with a three dimensional standard figure and a comparison figure which was either identical to the standard figure, or its mirror image; the comparison stimulus was rotated, either clockwise or into the third dimension. Shepard and Metzler found that the time needed to judge whether the comparison stimulus was identical or a mirror image depended directly on the size of the angle between the target orientation and the orientation of the standard.Q.According to the scanning experiments mentioned in the passage, it should take longer to scan longer distances because the subjects

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically. The system is represented by a computer model of a mathematical equation describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination depending on such factors as where the water is spilled and the geographic features that shape the water’s path and velocity. The basin of attraction for a body of water is the area of land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary is permeated by an extraordinarily high number of physical irregularities such as notches or zigzags. Along such a boundary, the only way to determine where spilled water will flow at any given point is actually to spill it and observe its motion; spilling the water at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type of uncertainty and that known as “chaos”; under chaos, a particle’s general destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction may abound in the failed attempts of scientists to replicate previous experimental results—in which case, scientists would be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main point of the passage?

Top Courses for GMAT

Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2025 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Although the journal Social Text was never at the forefront of publishing articles on feminism and never debated whether capitalism was the source of womens oppression in 1970s or whether male supremacy was itself a systematic form of domination, it is not clear whether social feminists classification of the journal as the one run by boys club could have been completely justified till recently. There could have been many reasons that the journals mission statement as set out in its first prospectus in 1979 did not take notice of the burning issues feminists were then discussing. May be triumvirate of founding editors were too focused on Marxist high theory to consider gender alongside economic class as an important mode of social organization and oppression, or on the other hand they may have simply chosen on purpose to not include feminism specifically in its charter.The recent paper by Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the first prospectus contained the seeds of its own feminist undoing. The founders demarcated fields of focus for the journal that could hardly be explored without attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women. They were rather interested in everyday life, mass culture, and consumer society. Hence, the little feminist work that appears in Social Text is in the realm of cultural analysis not revolutionary praxis and is often buried in the back of the journal in Unequal Developments, the section that offers reviews and experimental writing.For example, in the second edition of the journal in the section Unequal Developments, Christine Holmland performs a thorough feminist dissection of the then-current Disney film The North Avenue Irregulars, showing how this comedy about a group of church ladies who take on the local mafia superficially celebrates, but finally deflates the idea of womens activism, and along the way reinforces gendered roles at every level of social life.The passage suggested that while drafting the first prospectus, the editorsa)Excluded the journal from focusing on those fields that required specific attention to gender, sexuality, and the historical experiences of women.b)Chose only those fields of focus that were not concerned with the well-being of women.c)More interested in the emancipation of common man than women.d)Were too focused on society to focus on the status of women.e)Only allowed articles related to women in the last sections of the journals.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev