Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 10 2024 is part of Class 10 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 10 exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 10 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 10. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 10 Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the questions based on it. Choose the most appropriate answer.It is taken for granted by the advocates of oriental learning that no native of this country can possibly, attain more than a mere smattering of English. They do not attempt to prove this. But they perpetually insinuate it. They designate the education which their opponents recommend as a mere spelling-book education. They assume it as undeniable that the question is between a profound knowledge of Indian and Arabic literature and science on the one side, and superficial knowledge of the rudiments of English on the other. This is not merely an assumption, but an assumption contrary to all reason and experience. We know that foreigners of all nations do learn our language sufficiently to have access to all the most abstruse knowledge which it contains sufficiently to relish even the more delicate graces of our most idiomatic writers. There are, in this very town, natives who are quite competent to discuss political or scientific questions with fluency and precision in the English language. I have heard the very question on which I am now writing discussed by native gentlemen with a liberality and an intelligence which would do credit to any member of the Committee of Public Instruction. Indeed, it is unusual to find, even in the literary circles of the Continent, any foreigner who can express herself/himself in English with so much facility and correctness as we find in many Indians. Nobody, I suppose, will contend that English is so difficult to an Indian as Greek to an Englishman. Yet an intelligent English youth, in a much smaller number of years than our unfortunate pupils pass at the Sanskrit College, becomes able to read, to enjoy, and even to imitate not unhappily the compositions of the best Greek authors. Less than half the time which enables an English youth to read Herodotus and Sophocles ought to enable an Indian to read Hume and Milton.Q. Which of the following ideas does the writer have a problem with?a)Some natives are proficient in discussing complex topicsb)Knowledge of English is pitched against that of Indian and Arabic literature.c)Foreigners can read and enjoy some of the difficult English writings.d)Learning English for an Indian can be easier than learning Greek for an EnglishmanCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 10 tests.