Directions: In each question below a statement is given followed by t...
Statement: Travelling by trains rather than cabs is more convenient and economical in Paris.
Assumptions:
I. Paris is an expensive city.
II. Train services are reasonably good in Paris.
Explanation:
The statement suggests that travelling by trains is more convenient and economical in Paris. Let's analyze the assumptions:
Assumption I: Paris is an expensive city.
The statement does not explicitly mention anything about the cost of living or expenses in Paris. It only states that travelling by trains is more convenient and economical. Hence, assumption I is not implicit.
Assumption II: Train services are reasonably good in Paris.
The statement indirectly implies that train services in Paris are better than cab services. If train services were not reasonably good, it would not be mentioned as a more convenient option. Therefore, assumption II is implicit.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis, only assumption II is implicit. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - if only assumption II is implicit.
Directions: In each question below a statement is given followed by t...
Based on transportation we cannot say that Paris is an expensive city. So, I is not implicit in the statement. From the statement, it is clear that train services are reasonably good in Paris. So, II is implicit in the statement.