Question Description
Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: The sentence given below is a legal principle followed by a factual situation based on the legal principle. Choose the correct option, which relates both the principle and the situation.Legal Principle: A person is liable for all the injurious consequences of his careless act.Factual Situation: Ramesh, a snake charmer, was exhibiting his talents to a group of people. One of the snakes escaped and bit a child who had to be hospitalised for two days for treatment. Is Ramesh liable to compensate the child's family?a)Ramesh is liable to compensate the child's family for his careless act.b)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because he exercised due care and did not do it willfully.c)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it is the duty of the spectators to take adequate care.d)Ramesh is not liable to compensate the child's family because it was a mere accident.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.