Question Description
The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.