CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   The question below are based on the reasonin... Start Learning for Free
The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
  • a)
    The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
  • b)
    Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
  • c)
    The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.
  • d)
    People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.
  • e)
    It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief stat...
Explanation:
b) Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication:
This choice does not directly strengthen the argument that advertisers withdrew their advertisements due to moral disapproval. It only suggests a shift in advertising strategy without addressing the moral considerations.
c) The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew:
This choice directly strengthens the argument by providing a plausible reason for advertisers to withdraw their advertisements. If they believed that staying with the changed publication would increase their product sales, it implies a financial incentive for their decision. This emphasizes that their moral concerns played a significant role in their actions.
Therefore, option c is the best answer as it provides a strong link between the advertisers' moral considerations and their decision to withdraw advertisements from the publication.
Free Test
Community Answer
The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief stat...
The suppressed premise in this argument is that the advertisers hurt themselves financially by withdrawing their advertisements, or at least did not help themselves. To strengthen the argument, we need to show that this assumption is true. Choice (C) implies that this is the case by stating that the advertisers expected to lose sales if they withdrew their advertisements. Hence the answer is (C).
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Group QuestionAnswer the following question based on the information given below.A certain Twenty20 cricket tournament is about to start and there are 7 media sponsors A, B, C, D, E, F and G for it. They have the advertisement rights of 50%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5% and 10% respectively for each of the match. A typical cricket match has 2 innings each of 20 overs. The telecasting channel has the following rules in terms of advertisements.1. The advertisements have to be telecasted according to a companys advertisement rights as mentioned above. For example, out of total advertisement timing, A should not hold more than 50%.2. There should be a commercial break at the end of every over.3. There should be 2 advertisements telecasted in each of these breaks.4. A break cannot exceed a time frame of 90 seconds but slotting of advertisements should be done in such a way so as to use the maximum of time frame.5. Both the advertisements telecasted in the break cannot be of the same company.Following table shows the advertisement from each of the sponsor together with its time frame. For example, company A has 2 advertisements; one is of 30 seconds while other is of 60 seconds.The table also shows the competitor of the company. For example, companies A, B and C are competitors of each other.The telecasting channel wants to impress the sponsors by telecasting their longest advertisement keeping in mind the above rules. On a clash of timings, the telecasting channel can telecast either of the advertisements to satisfy the rules.For all the questions below, assume that both the innings lasted for 20 overs each.Q.At the maximum, how many 30 seconds advertisement of company A can be telecasted in an innings ? Correct answer is '12'. Can you explain this answer?

A certain Twenty 20 cricket tournament is about to start and there are 7 media sponsors A, B, C, D, E, F and G for it. They have the advertisement rights of 50%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5% and 10% respectively for each of the match. A typical cricket match has 2 innings each of 20 overs. The telecasting channel has the following rules in terms of advertisements.1. The advertisements have to be telecasted according to a companys advertisement rights as mentioned above. For example, out of total advertisement timing, A should not hold more than 50%.2. There should be a commercial break at the end of every over.3. There should be 2 advertisements telecasted in each of these breaks.4. A break cannot exceed a time frame of 90 seconds but slotting of advertisements should be done in such a way so as to use the maximum of time frame.5. Both the advertisements telecasted in the break cannot be of the same company.Following table shows the advertisement from each of the sponsor together with its time frame. For example, company A has 2 advertisements; one is of 30 seconds while other is of 60 seconds.The table also shows the competitor of the company. For example, companies A, B and C are competitors of each other.The telecasting channel wants to impress the sponsors by telecasting their longest advertisement keeping in mind the above rules. On a clash of timings, the telecasting channel can telecast either of the advertisements to satisfy the rules.For all the questions below, assume that both the innings lasted for 20 overs each.Q.Find the maximum number of advertisements of 30 seconds advertisements telecasted. (Consider that entire advertisement time is utilize d) Correct answer is '32'. Can you explain this answer?

A certain Twenty 20 cricket tournament is about to start and there are 7 media sponsors A, B, C, D, E, F and G for it. They have the advertisement rights of 50%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5% and 10% respectively for each of the match. A typical cricket match has 2 innings each of 20 overs. The telecasting channel has the following rules in terms of advertisements.1. The advertisements have to be telecasted according to a companys advertisement rights as mentioned above. For example, out of total advertisement timing, A should not hold more than 50%.2. There should be a commercial break at the end of every over.3. There should be 2 advertisements telecasted in each of these breaks.4. A break cannot exceed a time frame of 90 seconds but slotting of advertisements should be done in such a way so as to use the maximum of time frame.5. Both the advertisements telecasted in the break cannot be of the same company.Following table shows the advertisement from each of the sponsor together with its time frame. For example, company A has 2 advertisements; one is of 30 seconds while other is of 60 seconds.The table also shows the competitor of the company. For example, companies A, B and C are competitors of each other.The telecasting channel wants to impress the sponsors by telecasting their longest advertisement keeping in mind the above rules. On a clash of timings, the telecasting channel can telecast either of the advertisements to satisfy the rules.For all the questions below, assume that both the innings lasted for 20 overs each.Q.The company A earns additional revenue of Rs. 10,000 when a 60secondsadvertisement is telecasted while it earns revenue of Rs. 5,000 when a 30 seconds advertisement is telecasted. What is the maximum revenue that the company A can earn from a match? (Consider that entire advertisement time is utilized.)Note: Enter only numerical value. Correct answer is '300000'. Can you explain this answer?

Top Courses for CAT

The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew.d)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence.e)It was expected that the changed publication would appeal principally to those in a different income group.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev