All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Advertisers are often criticized for their u... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.
Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?
  • a)
    The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.
  • b)
    Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.
  • c)
    The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrew
  • d)
    People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violence
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation ...
The suppressed premise in this argument is that the advertisers hurt themselves financially by withdrawing their advertisements, or at least did not help themselves. To strengthen the argument, we need to show that this assumption is true. Choice (C) implies that this is the case by stating that the advertisers expected to lose sales if they withdrew their advertisements. Hence the answer is (C).
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation ...
Understanding the Argument
The argument suggests that some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from a publication that shifted its focus to sex and violence due to moral disapproval. This implies that not all advertisers are solely driven by financial gain; some may consider ethical implications in their marketing strategies.
Strengthening the Argument
To strengthen this argument, we need evidence that highlights the advertisers' moral motivations. Option 'C' serves this purpose effectively.
Option C Explained
- If advertisers expected their product sales to increase by remaining with the changed publication, this indicates a financial incentive.
- However, if they anticipated a decrease in sales from staying due to moral disapproval, it reinforces the notion that their decision to withdraw was influenced by ethics rather than profit.
Why Other Options Fall Short
- Option A: Advertisers switching to other family newspapers does not confirm their moral stance, as they could simply be seeking a different audience.
- Option B: Some advertisers switching to the changed publication would suggest a willingness to accept the new content, which contradicts the idea of moral disapproval.
- Option D: People who read family newspapers not buying the changed publication does not address the advertisers' motivations; it merely reflects consumer behavior.
Conclusion
In conclusion, option 'C' effectively strengthens the argument by illustrating that advertisers are genuinely conflicted between moral values and potential financial benefits, emphasizing that not all advertising decisions are purely profit-driven. This insight adds depth to the understanding of advertisers' motivations in response to content changes in publications.
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

The question below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage.Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?

The critics who denigrate advertising attack not only advertising but also by logical necessity capitalism, ethical egoism, and reason. As an institution in the division of labor and an instrument of capitalistic production, advertising communicates to many people at one time, the availability and nature of need- and want-satisfying products. In essence, advertising is salesmanship via the mass media; as such, it is the capitalists largest sales force and most effective means of delivering information to the market. In addition, advertising by its essential nature blatantly and unapologetically appeals to the self-interest of consumers for the blatant and selfish gain of capitalists. To criticize advertising is to criticize capitalism and ethical egoism.At the most fundamental level, the attacks on advertising are an assault on reason on mans ability to form concepts and to think in principles because advertising is a conceptual communication to many people at one time about the conceptual achievements of others. It is attacked for precisely this aspect of its nature. The goal of advertising is to sell products to consumers, and the means bywhich this goal is achieved is to communicate what advertisers call the product concept. An advertisement is itself an abstraction, a concept of what the capitalist has produced. Thus, advertising is a conceptual communication in a market economy to self-interested buyers about the self-interested, conceptual achievements of capitalists. To criticize advertising at the most fundamental level- is to assault mans consciousness.From its earliest days, critics attacked capitalism for its dependence on the profit motive and the pursuit of self-interest. As the most visible manifestation, or point man of capitalism, advertising can be called the capitalists tool of selfishness. In a world culture based on altruism and self-sacrifice, it is amazing that advertising has lasted as long as it has. Indeed, its growth was stunted in Great Britain and Ireland for 141 years by a tax on newspapers and newspaper advertising. If selfishness is the original sin of man, according to Judeo-Christian ethics, then surely advertising is the original sin of capitalism. More accurately, advertising is the serpent that encourages man to pursue selfish gain and, in subtler form, to disobey authority. In contemporary economics, pure and perfect competition is the Garden of Eden in which the lion lies down beside the lamb and this dirty, filthy advertising is entirely absent-because consumers allegedly have perfect information. Small wonder that advertising does not have a good press.At the level of fundamental ideas, three attacks on advertising constitute the assault on consciousness. One attack attributes to advertising the coercive power to force consumers to buy products they do not need or want. At the level of metaphysics, this attack denies the volitional nature of reason, that is, free will; consequently, it denies, either explicitly or implicitly, the validity of human consciousness as such. A second attack derides advertising for how offensive it allegedly is; ultimately, critics advocate regulation to control the allegedly offensive advertising. At root -that is, at the level of ethics this attack denies that values are objective, that values are a product of the relation between material objects and a volitional consciousness that evaluates them. Consequently, it denies the existence of rational options.A third attack, which derives from contemporary economics, views advertising as a tool of monopoly power. At the level of epistemology, however, this attack denies the possibility of truth and certainty, because reason allegedly is impotent to know reality; all man can do is emulate the methods of physics, by conducting statistically controlled experiments, and attempt to establish an uncertain, probabilistic knowledge.These three assaults on consciousness form the philosophic foundations of what are commonly known as the social and economic criticisms of advertising, the first two forming the foundation of the social criticisms, the third the foundation of the economic criticisms. The quantity of literature that attacks advertising approaches the infinite. The list of complaints is long, and each one has many variations. Explicitly or implicitly, all attacks attribute to advertising the power to initiate physical force against both consumers and competitors. The social criticisms assert that advertising adds no value to the products it promotes; therefore, it is superfluous, inherently dishonest, immoral, and fraudulent. The economic criticisms assert that advertising increases prices and wastes societys valuable resources; therefore, advertising contributes to the establishment of monopoly power.In essence, there are two social criticisms. The first explicitly charges advertising with the power to force consumers to buy products they do not need or want; the second implicitly charges advertising with this power. According to the first, advertising changes the tastes and preferences of consumers by coercing them to conform to the desires of producers. For example, consumers may want safer auto-mobiles, but what they get, according to the critics, are racing stripes and aluminum hubcaps. Forcing consumers to conform to the desires of producers, the critics point out, is the opposite of what advocates of capitalism claim about a free- market economy-namely, that producers conform to the tastes and preferences of consumers. Within the first criticism there are two forms.The more serious claims that advertising, by its very nature, is inherently deceptive, because it manipulates consumers into buying products they do not need or want. The most specific example of this criticism is the charge of subliminal advertising. Thus, when looking at a place mat in front of you at a Howard Johnsons restaurant, with its picture of the fried clam special, you might be deceived and manipulated into changing your taste. The other form claims that advertising is merely coercive, by creating needs and wants that otherwise would not exist without it. That is, highly emotional, persuasive, combative advertising -as opposed to rational, informative, and constructive advertising - is claimed to be a kind of physical force that destroys consumer sovereignty over the free market. This is Galbraiths dependence effect, so called because our wants, he claims, are dependent on or created by the process by which they are satisfied- the process of production, especially advertising and salesmanship. Our wants for breakfast cereal and laundry detergent, says Galbraith, are contrived and artificial. The psychology of behaviorism has strongly influenced this second form of thefirst social criticism.Both forms of the coercive power charge refer repeatedly to the advertising of cigarettes, liquor, drugs, sports cars, deodorant, Gucci shoes, and color television sets as evidence of advertisings alleged power to force unneeded and unwanted products on the poor, helpless consumer. The charge of manipulation and deception is more serious than mere coercion because manipulation is more devious; a manipulator can make consumers buy products they think are good for them when, in fact, that is not the case. The charge of manipulation, in effect, views advertising as a pack of lies. The charge of mere coercion, on the other hand, claims that advertising is just brute force; advertising in this view, in effect, is excessively pushy.According to the second social criticism, advertising offends the consumers sense of good taste by insulting and degrading his intelligence, by promoting morally offensive products, and by encouraging harmful and immoral behavior. Prime targets of this offensiveness criticism are Mr. Whipple and his Charmin bathroom tissue commercials, as well as the ring around the collar commercials of Wisk liquid detergent and the Noxzema take it all off shaving cream ads. But worse, the critics allege, advertising promotes products that have no redeeming moral value, such as cigarettes, beer, and pornographic literature. Advertising encourages harmful and immoral behavior and therefore is itself immoral. Although this criticism does not begin by attributing coercive power to advertising, it usually ends by supporting one or both forms of the first social criticism, thus calling for the regulation or banishment of a certain type of offensive-meaning coercive-advertising.Q. Which of the following statements does not agree with the idea of social criticism?

The questions below are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by common sense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. Advertisement: Anyone who exercises knows from firsthand experience that exercise leads to better performance of such physical organs as the heart and the lungs, as well as to improvement in muscle tone. And since your brain is a physical organ, your actions can improve its performance, too. Act now. Subscribe to Stimulus: read the magazine that exercises your brain. The advertisement employs which one of the following argumentative strategies?

A certain Twenty 20 cricket tournament is about to start and there are 7 media sponsors A, B, C, D, E, F and G for it. They have the advertisement rights of 50%, 15%, 10%, 5%, 5%, 5% and 10% respectively for each of the match. A typical cricket match has 2 innings each of 20 overs. The telecasting channel has the following rules in terms of advertisements.1. The advertisements have to be telecasted according to a companys advertisement rights as mentioned above. For example, out of total advertisement timing, A should not hold more than 50%.2. There should be a commercial break at the end of every over.3. There should be 2 advertisements telecasted in each of these breaks.4. A break cannot exceed a time frame of 90 seconds but slotting of advertisements should be done in such a way so as to use the maximum of time frame.5. Both the advertisements telecasted in the break cannot be of the same company.Following table shows the advertisement from each of the sponsor together with its time frame. For example, company A has 2 advertisements; one is of 30 seconds while other is of 60 seconds.The table also shows the competitor of the company. For example, companies A, B and C are competitors of each other.The telecasting channel wants to impress the sponsors by telecasting their longest advertisement keeping in mind the above rules. On a clash of timings, the telecasting channel can telecast either of the advertisements to satisfy the rules.For all the questions below, assume that both the innings lasted for 20 overs each.Q.Find the maximum number of advertisements of 30 seconds advertisements telecasted. (Consider that entire advertisement time is utilize d) Correct answer is '32'. Can you explain this answer?

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. There is evidence, however, that some advertisers are motivated by moral as well as financial considerations. A particular publication decided to change its image from being a family newspaper to concentration on sex and violence, thus appealing to a different readership. Some advertisers withdrew their advertisements from the publication, and this must have been because they morally disapproved of publishing salacious material.Q. Which one of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument?a)The advertisers switched their advertisements to other family newspapers.b)Some advertisers switched from family newspapers to advertise in the changed publication.c)The advertisers expected their product sales to increase if they stayed with the changed publication, but to decrease if they withdrewd)People who generally read family newspapers are not likely to buy newspapers that concentrate on sex and violenceCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup