Question Description
Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: When a person enjoys the benefit of an act that was non-gratuitous in nature, he is under an obligation to compensate the person who did the act.a)No, it is in the nature of humanity to assist fellow human beingsb)Yes, since the tea stall owner spent money on her calls, food and medicinesc)No, however the tea stall owner can claim the amount from the owners of the elephant who caused the stampeded)Yes, since she caused the tea stall owner so much trouble, her parents should compensate and additionally, reward himCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.