CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfer...
Start Learning for Free
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."
Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannan
- a)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his house
- b)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate nature
- c)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnan
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or ...
Principle: The principle states that nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment should be normal and reasonable, taking into account the surrounding situation.
Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house, and the sound of typing disturbed Krishnan, who could not tolerate any kind of continuous noise. Krishnan filed a suit against Kannan.
Analysis:
To determine Kannan's liability in this case, we need to analyze whether his actions constitute an unlawful interference with Krishnan's use or enjoyment of his land or some right over it.
Interference with Use or Enjoyment:
- Krishnan's claim is based on the disturbance caused by the sound of typing. It is necessary to establish whether this interference is significant enough to affect Krishnan's normal and reasonable use or enjoyment of his land.
- The principle does not provide an objective standard for what is considered normal and reasonable. It depends on the surrounding situation and the particular sensitivities or preferences of the person affected.
Reasonable Expectations:
- In this case, Krishnan claims that he cannot tolerate any kind of continuous noise. However, it is essential to consider whether this expectation is reasonable in a residential locality, where some level of noise is generally expected.
- If the typing sound is not excessively loud or disruptive, and it is within the customary level of noise for a residential area, then Krishnan's claim may not be valid.
Impact on Others:
- Another relevant factor to consider is whether the typing sound disturbs anyone else besides Krishnan. If the sound is not causing a disturbance to other neighbors, it suggests that the interference may be subjective and specific to Krishnan's delicate nature.
- If no other neighbor has complained about the noise, it weakens Krishnan's claim and suggests that the typing class may not be unreasonably interfering with the use or enjoyment of land.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis of the principle and the facts of the case, it can be concluded that Kannan is not liable for the disturbance caused by the typing sound. The interference does not appear to be significant enough to unlawfully interfere with Krishnan's use or enjoyment of his land, considering the normal and reasonable expectations in a residential area. Additionally, if no other neighbor is affected by the noise, it further supports the conclusion that Kannan's actions are not unreasonable. Therefore, option 'C' is the correct answer.
Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house, and the sound of typing disturbed Krishnan, who could not tolerate any kind of continuous noise. Krishnan filed a suit against Kannan.
Analysis:
To determine Kannan's liability in this case, we need to analyze whether his actions constitute an unlawful interference with Krishnan's use or enjoyment of his land or some right over it.
Interference with Use or Enjoyment:
- Krishnan's claim is based on the disturbance caused by the sound of typing. It is necessary to establish whether this interference is significant enough to affect Krishnan's normal and reasonable use or enjoyment of his land.
- The principle does not provide an objective standard for what is considered normal and reasonable. It depends on the surrounding situation and the particular sensitivities or preferences of the person affected.
Reasonable Expectations:
- In this case, Krishnan claims that he cannot tolerate any kind of continuous noise. However, it is essential to consider whether this expectation is reasonable in a residential locality, where some level of noise is generally expected.
- If the typing sound is not excessively loud or disruptive, and it is within the customary level of noise for a residential area, then Krishnan's claim may not be valid.
Impact on Others:
- Another relevant factor to consider is whether the typing sound disturbs anyone else besides Krishnan. If the sound is not causing a disturbance to other neighbors, it suggests that the interference may be subjective and specific to Krishnan's delicate nature.
- If no other neighbor has complained about the noise, it weakens Krishnan's claim and suggests that the typing class may not be unreasonably interfering with the use or enjoyment of land.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis of the principle and the facts of the case, it can be concluded that Kannan is not liable for the disturbance caused by the typing sound. The interference does not appear to be significant enough to unlawfully interfere with Krishnan's use or enjoyment of his land, considering the normal and reasonable expectations in a residential area. Additionally, if no other neighbor is affected by the noise, it further supports the conclusion that Kannan's actions are not unreasonable. Therefore, option 'C' is the correct answer.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or ...
Kannan will not be liable since Krishnan's plea is an oversensitive one. And the court does not entertain complaints which are oversensitive or trivial in nature.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle: "Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land, or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account the surrounding situation."Facts: Krishnan and Kannan were neighbors in a residential locality. Kannan started a typing class in a part of his house and his typing sound disturbed Krishnan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Kannana)Kannan is liable, because he should not have started typing class in his houseb)Kannan is liable, because as a neighbor, he should have realized Krishnan's delicate naturec)Kannan is not liable, because typing sound did not disturb anyone else than Krishnand)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup