In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > In the question given below, a statement is ...

In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.

Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choice

a)
Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.
b)
Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.
c)
Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.
d)
Both a and c
e)
Both b and c

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select t...

Option b is eliminated as it does not offer a premise from which the given statement can be inferred. Options a and c propagate the view that children are not wise enough to make healthy food choices, and the poor choices they make can carry forward into adulthood. Hence option d is the right answer.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the given question.It may come as a surprise that some online restaurants do not have a traditional physical space where one can dine in. These restaurants, known as cloud kitchens or ghost kitchens, are merely commercial cooking spaces without a dine-in option. These are usually catering hubs for online pick-ups. Cloud kitchens were pegged to be one of the most lucrative business segments in the food-tech industry, as they received more funding than food delivery businesses in 2019. But the COVID pandemic upended several priors. The faith in the cloud kitchen has taken a hit. This begs the question: Do cloud kitchens still have the potential to disrupt the food-tech ecosystem?There are two cloud kitchen models. One, a food-tech partner offers retail kitchen space to chefs and restaurants. The kitchen space is to be shared by six to eight restaurants. The chefs are charged a membership fee covering rent, infrastructure, commercial equipment, and for added services like dishwashing and storing. Each restaurant/chef is responsible for handling their business. The food aggregator partners, in turn, prioritise these brands in their search metrics. This system allows food aggregators to control the supply of food and reduce their dependence on third-party restaurants.The second model is where one restaurant operator sets up a shared kitchen space where multiple cuisines under different brand names are prepared. This restaurant operator takes care of all the operational and promotional aspects of the business. Dubbed as the future of the eating-out industry, cloud kitchens have been sprouting across India. Located in low-rent areas, they maximise a restaurant's ability to service online orders while not causing inconvenience to diners in traditional sit-down restaurants. Typically, the initial investment for a cloud kitchen is around Rs. 10 lakh and could vary depending on the sophistication and area required. With an average order value of Rs. 300 and 750-800 orders/day, a cloud kitchen could break even in the first year.Though the cloud kitchen model looks lucrative on paper, it comes with its problems. While they have lower setup costs, their revenues are lower as well. Customers expect lower prices since there is no ambience to pay for, making it difficult for cloud kitchens to raise their prices easily. Because of the COVID pandemic, many consumers preferred to order online rather than visit a restaurant. Consumers prioritising health and hygiene prefer to order from a restaurant with a well-known brand name, good ratings, and reviews, even if it is slightly more expensive. It appears that physical visibility helps in building trust in the consumers' minds.Based on our conversation with food-tech investment professionals from venture capital firms, we find that they are no longer focused on cloud kitchens. As per the investors, cloud kitchens are challenging to build and scale. Building infrastructure/kitchen relies on capital arbitrage. Moreover, physical capital is not easy to scale. Next, finding the right quality workforce to deliver quality food consistently is not an easy task. Anyone can start a restaurant — that was the promise of a cloud kitchen. The novelty is gone since most restaurants are cloud kitchens today, as people are reluctant to eat out. Experts say that COVID-19 has been a blessing in disguise for the food-tech industry. The cloud kitchen, overall, has not proven to be profitable or easy to scale.Q. Which of the following is NOT an accurate example of a cloud kitchen?

View answer

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the given question.It may come as a surprise that some online restaurants do not have a traditional physical space where one can dine in. These restaurants, known as cloud kitchens or ghost kitchens, are merely commercial cooking spaces without a dine-in option. These are usually catering hubs for online pick-ups. Cloud kitchens were pegged to be one of the most lucrative business segments in the food-tech industry, as they received more funding than food delivery businesses in 2019. But the COVID pandemic upended several priors. The faith in the cloud kitchen has taken a hit. This begs the question: Do cloud kitchens still have the potential to disrupt the food-tech ecosystem?There are two cloud kitchen models. One, a food-tech partner offers retail kitchen space to chefs and restaurants. The kitchen space is to be shared by six to eight restaurants. The chefs are charged a membership fee covering rent, infrastructure, commercial equipment, and for added services like dishwashing and storing. Each restaurant/chef is responsible for handling their business. The food aggregator partners, in turn, prioritise these brands in their search metrics. This system allows food aggregators to control the supply of food and reduce their dependence on third-party restaurants.The second model is where one restaurant operator sets up a shared kitchen space where multiple cuisines under different brand names are prepared. This restaurant operator takes care of all the operational and promotional aspects of the business. Dubbed as the future of the eating-out industry, cloud kitchens have been sprouting across India. Located in low-rent areas, they maximise a restaurant's ability to service online orders while not causing inconvenience to diners in traditional sit-down restaurants. Typically, the initial investment for a cloud kitchen is around Rs. 10 lakh and could vary depending on the sophistication and area required. With an average order value of Rs. 300 and 750-800 orders/day, a cloud kitchen could break even in the first year.Though the cloud kitchen model looks lucrative on paper, it comes with its problems. While they have lower setup costs, their revenues are lower as well. Customers expect lower prices since there is no ambience to pay for, making it difficult for cloud kitchens to raise their prices easily. Because of the COVID pandemic, many consumers preferred to order online rather than visit a restaurant. Consumers prioritising health and hygiene prefer to order from a restaurant with a well-known brand name, good ratings, and reviews, even if it is slightly more expensive. It appears that physical visibility helps in building trust in the consumers' minds.Based on our conversation with food-tech investment professionals from venture capital firms, we find that they are no longer focused on cloud kitchens. As per the investors, cloud kitchens are challenging to build and scale. Building infrastructure/kitchen relies on capital arbitrage. Moreover, physical capital is not easy to scale. Next, finding the right quality workforce to deliver quality food consistently is not an easy task. Anyone can start a restaurant — that was the promise of a cloud kitchen. The novelty is gone since most restaurants are cloud kitchens today, as people are reluctant to eat out. Experts say that COVID-19 has been a blessing in disguise for the food-tech industry. The cloud kitchen, overall, has not proven to be profitable or easy to scale.Q. 'The novelty is gone since most restaurants are cloud kitchens today.' What is the author trying to imply from this statement?

View answer

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the given question.It may come as a surprise that some online restaurants do not have a traditional physical space where one can dine in. These restaurants, known as cloud kitchens or ghost kitchens, are merely commercial cooking spaces without a dine-in option. These are usually catering hubs for online pick-ups. Cloud kitchens were pegged to be one of the most lucrative business segments in the food-tech industry, as they received more funding than food delivery businesses in 2019. But the COVID pandemic upended several priors. The faith in the cloud kitchen has taken a hit. This begs the question: Do cloud kitchens still have the potential to disrupt the food-tech ecosystem?There are two cloud kitchen models. One, a food-tech partner offers retail kitchen space to chefs and restaurants. The kitchen space is to be shared by six to eight restaurants. The chefs are charged a membership fee covering rent, infrastructure, commercial equipment, and for added services like dishwashing and storing. Each restaurant/chef is responsible for handling their business. The food aggregator partners, in turn, prioritise these brands in their search metrics. This system allows food aggregators to control the supply of food and reduce their dependence on third-party restaurants.The second model is where one restaurant operator sets up a shared kitchen space where multiple cuisines under different brand names are prepared. This restaurant operator takes care of all the operational and promotional aspects of the business. Dubbed as the future of the eating-out industry, cloud kitchens have been sprouting across India. Located in low-rent areas, they maximise a restaurant's ability to service online orders while not causing inconvenience to diners in traditional sit-down restaurants. Typically, the initial investment for a cloud kitchen is around Rs. 10 lakh and could vary depending on the sophistication and area required. With an average order value of Rs. 300 and 750-800 orders/day, a cloud kitchen could break even in the first year.Though the cloud kitchen model looks lucrative on paper, it comes with its problems. While they have lower setup costs, their revenues are lower as well. Customers expect lower prices since there is no ambience to pay for, making it difficult for cloud kitchens to raise their prices easily. Because of the COVID pandemic, many consumers preferred to order online rather than visit a restaurant. Consumers prioritising health and hygiene prefer to order from a restaurant with a well-known brand name, good ratings, and reviews, even if it is slightly more expensive. It appears that physical visibility helps in building trust in the consumers' minds.Based on our conversation with food-tech investment professionals from venture capital firms, we find that they are no longer focused on cloud kitchens. As per the investors, cloud kitchens are challenging to build and scale. Building infrastructure/kitchen relies on capital arbitrage. Moreover, physical capital is not easy to scale. Next, finding the right quality workforce to deliver quality food consistently is not an easy task. Anyone can start a restaurant — that was the promise of a cloud kitchen. The novelty is gone since most restaurants are cloud kitchens today, as people are reluctant to eat out. Experts say that COVID-19 has been a blessing in disguise for the food-tech industry. The cloud kitchen, overall, has not proven to be profitable or easy to scale.Q. Which of the following best defines the concept of cloud kitchen?

View answer

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the given question.It may come as a surprise that some online restaurants do not have a traditional physical space where one can dine in. These restaurants, known as cloud kitchens or ghost kitchens, are merely commercial cooking spaces without a dine-in option. These are usually catering hubs for online pick-ups. Cloud kitchens were pegged to be one of the most lucrative business segments in the food-tech industry, as they received more funding than food delivery businesses in 2019. But the COVID pandemic upended several priors. The faith in the cloud kitchen has taken a hit. This begs the question: Do cloud kitchens still have the potential to disrupt the food-tech ecosystem?There are two cloud kitchen models. One, a food-tech partner offers retail kitchen space to chefs and restaurants. The kitchen space is to be shared by six to eight restaurants. The chefs are charged a membership fee covering rent, infrastructure, commercial equipment, and for added services like dishwashing and storing. Each restaurant/chef is responsible for handling their business. The food aggregator partners, in turn, prioritise these brands in their search metrics. This system allows food aggregators to control the supply of food and reduce their dependence on third-party restaurants.The second model is where one restaurant operator sets up a shared kitchen space where multiple cuisines under different brand names are prepared. This restaurant operator takes care of all the operational and promotional aspects of the business. Dubbed as the future of the eating-out industry, cloud kitchens have been sprouting across India. Located in low-rent areas, they maximise a restaurant's ability to service online orders while not causing inconvenience to diners in traditional sit-down restaurants. Typically, the initial investment for a cloud kitchen is around Rs. 10 lakh and could vary depending on the sophistication and area required. With an average order value of Rs. 300 and 750-800 orders/day, a cloud kitchen could break even in the first year.Though the cloud kitchen model looks lucrative on paper, it comes with its problems. While they have lower setup costs, their revenues are lower as well. Customers expect lower prices since there is no ambience to pay for, making it difficult for cloud kitchens to raise their prices easily. Because of the COVID pandemic, many consumers preferred to order online rather than visit a restaurant. Consumers prioritising health and hygiene prefer to order from a restaurant with a well-known brand name, good ratings, and reviews, even if it is slightly more expensive. It appears that physical visibility helps in building trust in the consumers' minds.Based on our conversation with food-tech investment professionals from venture capital firms, we find that they are no longer focused on cloud kitchens. As per the investors, cloud kitchens are challenging to build and scale. Building infrastructure/kitchen relies on capital arbitrage. Moreover, physical capital is not easy to scale. Next, finding the right quality workforce to deliver quality food consistently is not an easy task. Anyone can start a restaurant — that was the promise of a cloud kitchen. The novelty is gone since most restaurants are cloud kitchens today, as people are reluctant to eat out. Experts say that COVID-19 has been a blessing in disguise for the food-tech industry. The cloud kitchen, overall, has not proven to be profitable or easy to scale.Q. Which of the following statements is NOT TRUE in context of the passage?

View answer

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the given question.It may come as a surprise that some online restaurants do not have a traditional physical space where one can dine in. These restaurants, known as cloud kitchens or ghost kitchens, are merely commercial cooking spaces without a dine-in option. These are usually catering hubs for online pick-ups. Cloud kitchens were pegged to be one of the most lucrative business segments in the food-tech industry, as they received more funding than food delivery businesses in 2019. But the COVID pandemic upended several priors. The faith in the cloud kitchen has taken a hit. This begs the question: Do cloud kitchens still have the potential to disrupt the food-tech ecosystem?There are two cloud kitchen models. One, a food-tech partner offers retail kitchen space to chefs and restaurants. The kitchen space is to be shared by six to eight restaurants. The chefs are charged a membership fee covering rent, infrastructure, commercial equipment, and for added services like dishwashing and storing. Each restaurant/chef is responsible for handling their business. The food aggregator partners, in turn, prioritise these brands in their search metrics. This system allows food aggregators to control the supply of food and reduce their dependence on third-party restaurants.The second model is where one restaurant operator sets up a shared kitchen space where multiple cuisines under different brand names are prepared. This restaurant operator takes care of all the operational and promotional aspects of the business. Dubbed as the future of the eating-out industry, cloud kitchens have been sprouting across India. Located in low-rent areas, they maximise a restaurant's ability to service online orders while not causing inconvenience to diners in traditional sit-down restaurants. Typically, the initial investment for a cloud kitchen is around Rs. 10 lakh and could vary depending on the sophistication and area required. With an average order value of Rs. 300 and 750-800 orders/day, a cloud kitchen could break even in the first year.Though the cloud kitchen model looks lucrative on paper, it comes with its problems. While they have lower setup costs, their revenues are lower as well. Customers expect lower prices since there is no ambience to pay for, making it difficult for cloud kitchens to raise their prices easily. Because of the COVID pandemic, many consumers preferred to order online rather than visit a restaurant. Consumers prioritising health and hygiene prefer to order from a restaurant with a well-known brand name, good ratings, and reviews, even if it is slightly more expensive. It appears that physical visibility helps in building trust in the consumers' minds.Based on our conversation with food-tech investment professionals from venture capital firms, we find that they are no longer focused on cloud kitchens. As per the investors, cloud kitchens are challenging to build and scale. Building infrastructure/kitchen relies on capital arbitrage. Moreover, physical capital is not easy to scale. Next, finding the right quality workforce to deliver quality food consistently is not an easy task. Anyone can start a restaurant — that was the promise of a cloud kitchen. The novelty is gone since most restaurants are cloud kitchens today, as people are reluctant to eat out. Experts say that COVID-19 has been a blessing in disguise for the food-tech industry. The cloud kitchen, overall, has not proven to be profitable or easy to scale.Q. Each of the following can act as a limitation of cloud kitchens, EXCEPT

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CAT

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In the question given below, a statement is provided to you. Select the answer choice that provides the premise from which the given statement can be inferred or derived.Unhealthy eating habits begin in childhood as children are not equipped to make healthy food choicea)Unlike adults, children are not able to make healthy decisions for themselves. They don't understand what calories, sodium content, or saturated fats are. They are unable to comprehend the long-term effects that fast food might have on their health and development. On the other hand, a toy is instantly appealing to them and offers a straightforward incentive to opt for such a meal. As long as the negative consequences cannot be explained to kids in a clear and compelling manner, we should not make unhealthy food even more desirable for them, as these unhealthy eating habits might carry forward into adulthood.b)Studies have shown that only a very small amount of the calories consumed by children come from foods like the Happy Meal. And while kids are eating at fast food restaurants at an alarming rate, it is their parents who make the decision to take them there 93% of the time. Of the kids who do want to go to McDonald's, only 8% cite the toy as the primary reason.c)Giving away toys with meals that are calorie laden and of poor nutritional quality creates an emotional attachment between the child and fast food. This bond will then follow that child into adulthood, making it harder for her to make better nutritional choices in order to become a healthy individual. This ban would break that bond and make it easier for children to grow up to be healthier adults.d)Both a and ce)Both b and cCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam