CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: In making decisions about import... Start Learning for Free
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.
Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?
Arguments:
I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.
II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.
  • a)
    Only argument I is strong.
  • b)
    Only argument II is strong.
  • c)
    Either I or II is strong.
  • d)
    Neither I nor II is strong.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...


Explanation:

Argument I:
The argument states that the central government should receive the major share of central taxes because most developmental programs are funded by the central government. This argument is strong as it directly addresses the question of whether state governments should retain major shares of central taxes. It highlights the importance of central government funding for developmental programs, which is a key aspect of the question at hand.

Argument II:
On the other hand, argument II states that state governments are short of funds and need more funds, which is a weak argument. While it is true that state governments may require additional funds, this argument does not directly address the question of whether state governments should retain major shares of central taxes. It focuses on a minor aspect related to the financial situation of state governments, which is not directly relevant to the question.
Therefore, in this case, neither argument I nor II is strong as they both do not directly address the main issue of whether state governments should be allowed to retain major shares of central taxes. The decision should be based on more concrete and directly relevant arguments related to the distribution of central taxes between the central and state governments.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...
Neither of the arguments is strong as they fail to provide any plausible reason related to keeping of funds.
'I' is weak as the developmental programmes may also be carried out by the state.
'II' is weak as the state cannot ingress on the centre's fund just because it is short of funds.
Hence, neither I nor II is a strong argument.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument, and then mark your answer accordingly.Should the state governments be allowed to retain major shares of the central taxes collected in the respective states?Arguments:I. No, the central government should receive the major share as most of the developmental programmes are funded by the central government.II. Yes, most of the state governments are short of funds and they badly need more funds.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Neither I nor II is strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev