Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Direction: In the following question consist...

Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.

Statement:

Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.

Conclusions:

I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.

II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.

a)
Only conclusion I is valid.
b)
Only conclusion II is valid.
c)
Either conclusion I or II is valid.
d)
None of these

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: In the following question consists of one statement follow...

It has been clearly mentioned in the statement that the appointment of the bureaucrats only spoiled the financial institutions. So the person having experience in the similar field and expertise should be appointed. Hence both conclusions are valid.

Hence, the correct option is (C).

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: In the following question a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer:Statements: The government has spoiled many top-ranking financial institutions by appointing bureaucrats as Directors of these institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint Directors of the financial institutes taking into consideration the expertise of the person in the area of finance.II. The Director of the financial institution should have expertise commensurate with the financial work carried out by the institute.

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Sanjay Kothari, the Secretary to the President, has been selected as the new {X} by a high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an official said.Committee has also chosen former Information and Broadcasting Secretary Bimal Julka, currently serving as an Information Commissioner, as the new Chief Information Commissioner in the Central Information Commission.Sources said the recommendation for the appointment of Kothari and Julka, who are retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers, by a majority decision was opposed by Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury. The selection panel also included Union Home Minister Amit Shah."Kothari and Julka have been selected as the next {X} and CIC," said a senior government official, who did not want to be named.The three-member panel also decided by majority the appointment of Suresh Patel as Vigilance Commissioner and Anita Pandove as Information Commissioner.Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said government should initiate a fresh process for appointing the next {X} by inviting applications again."We demand that the entire process be scrapped in its entirety and a de novo process started by inviting applications afresh. There needs to be proper application of mind," he told reporters.Manish Tewari claimed that it is clear that government has a lot to hide and wants the {X} to be a "rubber stamp".Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala also attacked government over the appointment of {X} and CIC and alleged there is no place for transparency, accountability and constitutional processes in Prime Minister Narendra Modis New India, which was fatal for democracy.He alleged that the appointments of {X} and CIC are being made arbitrarily on the lines of "khul ja sim sim" (open sesam e)."Arbitrariness in top judicial institutions is fatal for democracy," he said."The appointments of {X} and CIC are being made on the lines of open sesame. Bring out names from the pocket and make appointments, thats it. There is no place left for transparency, accountability, constitutional processes and compliance of law in Modi jis New India," he charged on Twitter.It is free of control from any executive authority and has the responsibility of monitoring all vigilance activities in the Central Government, besides advising various authorities in planning, executing, reviewing and reforming their vigilance work.The Central Information Commission was constituted under the {Y} Act and has the jurisdiction over all central public authorities.Q.Read the statements below and mark the correct option.Statement I: The Central Information Commission is a constitutional body.Statement II: Its members are appointed by the President of India.

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Sanjay Kothari, the Secretary to the President, has been selected as the new {X} by a high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an official said.Committee has also chosen former Information and Broadcasting Secretary Bimal Julka, currently serving as an Information Commissioner, as the new Chief Information Commissioner in the Central Information Commission.Sources said the recommendation for the appointment of Kothari and Julka, who are retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers, by a majority decision was opposed by Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury. The selection panel also included Union Home Minister Amit Shah."Kothari and Julka have been selected as the next {X} and CIC," said a senior government official, who did not want to be named.The three-member panel also decided by majority the appointment of Suresh Patel as Vigilance Commissioner and Anita Pandove as Information Commissioner.Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said government should initiate a fresh process for appointing the next {X} by inviting applications again."We demand that the entire process be scrapped in its entirety and a de novo process started by inviting applications afresh. There needs to be proper application of mind," he told reporters.Manish Tewari claimed that it is clear that government has a lot to hide and wants the {X} to be a "rubber stamp".Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala also attacked government over the appointment of {X} and CIC and alleged there is no place for transparency, accountability and constitutional processes in Prime Minister Narendra Modis New India, which was fatal for democracy.He alleged that the appointments of {X} and CIC are being made arbitrarily on the lines of "khul ja sim sim" (open sesam e)."Arbitrariness in top judicial institutions is fatal for democracy," he said."The appointments of {X} and CIC are being made on the lines of open sesame. Bring out names from the pocket and make appointments, thats it. There is no place left for transparency, accountability, constitutional processes and compliance of law in Modi jis New India," he charged on Twitter.It is free of control from any executive authority and has the responsibility of monitoring all vigilance activities in the Central Government, besides advising various authorities in planning, executing, reviewing and reforming their vigilance work.The Central Information Commission was constituted under the {Y} Act and has the jurisdiction over all central public authorities.Q.What should be the maximum gap between two parliamentary sessions?

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Sanjay Kothari, the Secretary to the President, has been selected as the new {X} by a high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an official said.Committee has also chosen former Information and Broadcasting Secretary Bimal Julka, currently serving as an Information Commissioner, as the new Chief Information Commissioner in the Central Information Commission.Sources said the recommendation for the appointment of Kothari and Julka, who are retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers, by a majority decision was opposed by Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury. The selection panel also included Union Home Minister Amit Shah."Kothari and Julka have been selected as the next {X} and CIC," said a senior government official, who did not want to be named.The three-member panel also decided by majority the appointment of Suresh Patel as Vigilance Commissioner and Anita Pandove as Information Commissioner.Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said government should initiate a fresh process for appointing the next {X} by inviting applications again."We demand that the entire process be scrapped in its entirety and a de novo process started by inviting applications afresh. There needs to be proper application of mind," he told reporters.Manish Tewari claimed that it is clear that government has a lot to hide and wants the {X} to be a "rubber stamp".Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala also attacked government over the appointment of {X} and CIC and alleged there is no place for transparency, accountability and constitutional processes in Prime Minister Narendra Modis New India, which was fatal for democracy.He alleged that the appointments of {X} and CIC are being made arbitrarily on the lines of "khul ja sim sim" (open sesam e)."Arbitrariness in top judicial institutions is fatal for democracy," he said."The appointments of {X} and CIC are being made on the lines of open sesame. Bring out names from the pocket and make appointments, thats it. There is no place left for transparency, accountability, constitutional processes and compliance of law in Modi jis New India," he charged on Twitter.It is free of control from any executive authority and has the responsibility of monitoring all vigilance activities in the Central Government, besides advising various authorities in planning, executing, reviewing and reforming their vigilance work.The Central Information Commission was constituted under the {Y} Act and has the jurisdiction over all central public authorities.Q.Federalism in India describes the distribution of legal authority across national, state and local governments in India. It is taken from

View answer

Read the following passage and answer the question as directed.Sanjay Kothari, the Secretary to the President, has been selected as the new {X} by a high-powered committee headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an official said.Committee has also chosen former Information and Broadcasting Secretary Bimal Julka, currently serving as an Information Commissioner, as the new Chief Information Commissioner in the Central Information Commission.Sources said the recommendation for the appointment of Kothari and Julka, who are retired Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officers, by a majority decision was opposed by Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury. The selection panel also included Union Home Minister Amit Shah."Kothari and Julka have been selected as the next {X} and CIC," said a senior government official, who did not want to be named.The three-member panel also decided by majority the appointment of Suresh Patel as Vigilance Commissioner and Anita Pandove as Information Commissioner.Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari said government should initiate a fresh process for appointing the next {X} by inviting applications again."We demand that the entire process be scrapped in its entirety and a de novo process started by inviting applications afresh. There needs to be proper application of mind," he told reporters.Manish Tewari claimed that it is clear that government has a lot to hide and wants the {X} to be a "rubber stamp".Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala also attacked government over the appointment of {X} and CIC and alleged there is no place for transparency, accountability and constitutional processes in Prime Minister Narendra Modis New India, which was fatal for democracy.He alleged that the appointments of {X} and CIC are being made arbitrarily on the lines of "khul ja sim sim" (open sesam e)."Arbitrariness in top judicial institutions is fatal for democracy," he said."The appointments of {X} and CIC are being made on the lines of open sesame. Bring out names from the pocket and make appointments, thats it. There is no place left for transparency, accountability, constitutional processes and compliance of law in Modi jis New India," he charged on Twitter.It is free of control from any executive authority and has the responsibility of monitoring all vigilance activities in the Central Government, besides advising various authorities in planning, executing, reviewing and reforming their vigilance work.The Central Information Commission was constituted under the {Y} Act and has the jurisdiction over all central public authorities.Q.Which of the following acts has been redacted with {Y}?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam