CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Direction: In the following question consist... Start Learning for Free
Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.
Statement:
Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.
Conclusions:
I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.
II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.
  • a)
    Only conclusion I is valid.
  • b)
    Only conclusion II is valid.
  • c)
    Either conclusion I or II is valid.
  • d)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: In the following question consists of one statement follow...
It has been clearly mentioned in the statement that the appointment of the bureaucrats only spoiled the financial institutions. So the person having experience in the similar field and expertise should be appointed. Hence both conclusions are valid.
Hence, the correct option is (C).
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In the following question consists of one statement followed by two conclusions. You have to decide which one of them can be followed.Statement:Appointment of top bureaucrats as the head of top financial institutions was made by government. This is the reason of the downfall of those institutions.Conclusions:I. Government should appoint only those persons as the head, who have adequate expertise in the required field.II. The appointed head should have the similar work experience as carried out by that financial institutions.a)Only conclusion I is valid.b)Only conclusion II is valid.c)Either conclusion I or II is valid.d)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
Signup to solve all Doubts
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev